This is pretty close to the most purile dose of garbage I've read on here.
Some noob with about 5 minutes in the game makes a sweeping assumption that brands everyone a "ganker" , whatever the hell that is.
Then proceeds to enlighten us all how skilled and courageous he is as he thwarts this terrible menace.
Heads up mate. You're the problem not the solution.
Attacking other players is a valid and much supported core feature of the game.
These "gankers" that you so graciously pigeonhole by definition and deride for their playstyle in some attempt to garner popularist kudos are far more useful and necessary to the games ecosystem than whining nannies like you will ever be.
Most just want to fight someone. Anyone. Strong, weak ,alone, in wing it really doesn't matter. They're just trying to have some fun.
You on the other hand set out on your gameplay with the sole intention of spoiling another players game.
Doesn't that make You the "ganker".
If you were actually any good why not just submit and have at them?
Some noob with about 5 minutes in the game makes a sweeping assumption that brands everyone a "ganker" , whatever the hell that is.
Then proceeds to enlighten us all how skilled and courageous he is as he thwarts this terrible menace.
Heads up mate. You're the problem not the solution.
Attacking other players is a valid and much supported core feature of the game.
These "gankers" that you so graciously pigeonhole by definition and deride for their playstyle in some attempt to garner popularist kudos are far more useful and necessary to the games ecosystem than whining nannies like you will ever be.
Most just want to fight someone. Anyone. Strong, weak ,alone, in wing it really doesn't matter. They're just trying to have some fun.
You on the other hand set out on your gameplay with the sole intention of spoiling another players game.
Doesn't that make You the "ganker".
If you were actually any good why not just submit and have at them?
Last edited: