The theoretical chaos will settle out in the end.
For those that know what they're talking about, perhaps. For the likes of me, that just about get what is even being questioned; it's so beautifully fantastic. Honestly, feel free to laugh because I won't mind and life's too short to cry all the time, when Waves and Particles were mentioned I thought, 'if a particle wobbles about it will make waves so what's the problem?'. If I put my finger (particle) in a bath (field) and wiggled it about it would make ripples (waves), so I didn't understand the double slit experiment. I didn't see the problem because I didn't understand the conditions of the question (I reached 42, basically). I felt stupid for years. I watched a video presented by Professor Jim Al-Khalili, and there was a physical demonstration that made it click for me. His illustration just hit the nail on the head. I had at last lost my virginity and wanted to shout from the roof tops 'I get the question now!'.
Like Matter/Anti Matter annihilation. (Black Hole) If a matter/antimatter pair (not doing the 'something from nothing' here
) come into 'being', but one of the 'twins' went over the event horizon, then the other can't be annihilated, so will continue to exist.The culmination of this 'extra' matter will create energy. I think this is Hawking Radiation. Bet I'm wrong, though.
It's difficult without the right scientific language, let alone understanding, to describe thought experiments. I had another sleepless night thinking about Black Holes. I realise that trying to visualise these things is futile; that's why they are described mathematically and usually X10 to the power of ridiculous, but I was going with the Time and Space (same thing, I know) swapping places. I saw the graph on 'PBS Space Time' and understood enough about what was being proposed. Anyway, I imagined an object, let's say a tin of baked beans, past the event horizon and going down (I know, just let me say down for now) to the singularity. Aftger 'spaghettification', the tin will be broken down to it's smallest components. What I did then was twisted my head without the aid of 'funny fungus', and 'thought' a 'time rainbow'. I thought about a fundamental particle (like a raindrop in our space time) making a rainbow in 'time'. Not a visual rainbow, not a rainbow that you could paint on canvas, but time itself divided into frequencies. Of course this is probably rubbish, but it was worth the lack of sleep.