That's not so much an argument as it is an easily verifiable statement of obvious fact.
Well yes, different people have different opinions
That's not so much an argument as it is an easily verifiable statement of obvious fact.
I think the purpose of the letter was to reach out to Frontier in a constructive way rather than go straight on the attack with a boycott. They signers, from Harry Potter to Obsidian Ant, all just want to help. Think of this as a family intervention where they just want to talk. Your suggestion is more like locking a family member up until they give in. If the opponents to this petition are upset now imagine how they'd have reacted to a campaign to boycott....Yamiks nor any other content provider speaks for me. If you think this is going to affect a positivd response, then im afraid you will be disappointed. Look, if you want to get their attention, REALLY get thier attention, then try and convince everyone to stop spending money in the game. They will only respond to a lack of transactions. Crying and listing "grievances" in a post that comes across as an imitation legal document will only alienate them....look at their response....defensive, and blaming cmdrs for not understanding the process. You may have made things worse. Please, stop saying you speak for the community. We can speak for ourselves alot better with our wallets.
I think the purpose of the letter was to reach out to Frontier in a constructive way rather than go straight on the attack with a boycott. They signers, from Harry Potter to Obsidian Ant, all just want to help. Think of this as a family intervention where they just want to talk. Your suggestion is more like locking a family member up until they give in. If the opponents to this petition are upset now imagine how they'd have reacted to a campaign to boycott....
Its not so much an attempt to help as it is a disparate group with different agenda's all wanting their own way right now or else.
I know some of the signers and your assertion does not sit with what I know of them as people. Please just take a moment to consider that these are all just, as you say, disparate concerned fans who have seen in each other the same worries and want to help. Are you so dead set on opposing anyone who doesn't share your view that you can't countenance their being honest? Even for a moment?Its not so much an attempt to help as it is a disparate group with different agenda's all wanting their own way right now or else.
And how is that any different from what you do?
It's just not you doing it![]()
Its not so much an attempt to help as it is a disparate group with different agenda's all wanting their own way right now or else.
I know some of the signers and your assertion does not sit with what I know of them as people. Please just take a moment to consider that these are all just, as you say, disparate concerned fans who have seen in each other the same worries and want to help. Are you so dead set on opposing anyone who doesn't share your view that you can't countenance their being honest? Even for a moment?
Are you so dead set on opposing anyone who doesn't share your view that you can't countenance their being honest? Even for a moment?
To be far.... it is a list of things they propose to FD... I can't see anything related to "do this or else..."
EDIT: That said, none of the people that signed this document speaks for me.
"It is my understanding that there have been discussions about making changes or removing community ran channels in protest, should the response not meet expectations of this post."![]()
That's a fairly clear "or else" to me.
Of course, as you are doingso right now. But if you question the integrity of other people whom (I presume) you don't know without evidence then you cannot complain when someone queries you. Please don't act like my "maybe they're genuine and maye try to understand where they are coming from" is an effort to silence you.As a member of the community don't I get a say ?.
Of course he is and I'm not trying to silence him but he cannot put his opinion out there and expect no criticism, especially when he's questioning people's motives and integrity with no evidence.Stigbob is as entitled to his view as any of the rest of us. And we can ignore it if we choose.
Show me the last time I tried to grab the reins from FDEV.
Of course he is and I'm not trying to silence him but he cannot put his opinion out there and expect no criticism, especially when he's questioning people's motives and integrity with no evidence.
Soooo they wanted to take direct action but upon reflection decided not to. And admit all this openly. And this makes them dishonest... how?I'll always oppose and doubt the motivation of this sort of approach :
"The initial plan was to do a protest by shutting down discord servers and services but over time, the plan changed. OA joined the server after the protest part had been scrapped so I could see why he might be unaware that was part of the original plan."
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/dbbxeb/community_requests_to_frontier_developments/f24gnl5/
Because gankers. And SDC. SomehowSoooo they wanted to take direct action but upon reflection decided not to. And admit all this openly. And this makes them dishonest... how?
Soooo they wanted to take direct action but upon reflection decided not to. And admit all this openly. And this makes them dishonest... how?
You accused them of having agendas and question their motives and refuse to accept that they want to help, engage and work with Frontier for the benefit of the game despite having no way to know this. No way how you spin it, that's accusing them of dishonesty my friend.Dishonest ?, nope that's you reaching for an imaginary insult.
Entitled ?, yes definitely.
Which takes me back to my original point above of they want their own way right now or else. I prefer my video games made by developers whose products I enjoy and appreciate, rather than disgruntled/entitled players with some very bad idea's and no track record of making good games.