So you are saying we shouldn't have unrealistic expectations?
The ADS
- Thread starter Demsit
- Start date
- Status
So you are saying we shouldn't have unrealistic expectations?
Your method of argument is dishonest and smacks of desperation. You literally made the argument that the ADS was not one button because another function entirely used another button.
Claiming you're right is a delusion. I've said plenty, but I have little to say to you until you say something worthwhile.
It was marx's argument.
That should speak volumes...
I thought I explained rather well how I would use both - guess not
Mining says otherwise.
Even as someone as apparently brain damaged as you said I was can see you are a Hypocrite.Ok playtime over
Ill let you have some time out. I might engage with you again when you calm down.
You don't seem to want to engage in a discussion or debate anyway
What explanation would it take to appease you?
Dunno. Consider bringing ADS back maybe. Tiniest bit of acceptance that there might be a problem they didnt see before.
The meat is rancid though - anyone that thinks rancid meat is enjoyable is probably deficient in some respect.
What matters though is not what might have happened if something had happened but rather what actually did happen and how FD can resolve the impasse they ultimately created with poor reasoning on their part.
The FSS/DSS need not be removed, and the ADS need not be re-introduced, what is needed is the proper compromise solution that FD should have implemented for 3.3 in the first place.
For example: Properly integrate the FSS into the cockpit so that explorers can replicate the near approach scanning experience they had with the ADS by using the blobs to navigate by instead of the maps.
We have explained you just ignore the posts or insult the posters.
You seem to be like a kid with their fingers in their ears screaming at the top of their lungs so they don't have to hear what they don't want to hear, then claim no one told them anything.
It is quite ingenious
You ignore the other side and claim there is no counter argument
Highlight anyone who agrees with you as proof of overwhelming support
Insult people who disagree with you then claim the moral high ground from doing do and claim you are the victim.
It is just become an
I want
I deserve
Temper tantrum where any other point of view or position cannot even be allowed to be considered or held and this cannot exist in your world view .
In one of the other threads a while back I gave a very detailed explanation of a reason for not having both - though I don't speak for FD so it was only a reason that I could see, and I can't say whether it was a reason for FD. Took a lot of hours to go through it, over a number of posts.
At least a couple of people on this thread were around for it.
I'm sure a few of them remember.
Or maybe not!
That’s pretty much how it went with him in the last big ADS thread, actually. There comes a point where you just have to laugh.
The flaw with hoping for a compromise is that to hope for a compromise suggests an assumption that the current situation is not a compromise.
That's a very very unsafe assumption in this case.
Realistically what's being asked for isn't a compromise, it's to change an existing compromise in a specific direction.
Everyone would be much better off working from a realistic assessment of the situation, rather than going with an assumption that makes it sound like it's all clean and easy, and which allows them to assign blame in simply definable good/bad terms.
Wait one, are you saying there is a new way to surface mine, one that I don't have to use my mining lasers?
Already been mentioned. It's a logic fail. If you know the exact coordinates of every planet, why would you be required to search for them all over again in the FSS. It makes no logical sense.
- Status