We will certainly move to a new era.
From the prehistoric era to the era of very high technology.

From the prehistoric era to the era of very high technology.
Hello Games made No Man's Sky in 3 years with a team of 13, with far less prior expertise than FDEV as a long standing company have. And while it wasn't all that was promised initially, they pulled through, delivered a much more polished game a year later and have been pushing high content updates on a regular basis since.
The forum users have released more reliable information than FDev did, so I would kindly answer your question with "yes".Is hanging out on the forum of a product by a company you don't trust the new "normal" then ?. That's a crazy bandwagon I'll make rude gestures at.
Hmm... NMS went from graphically excellent pre-Horizons to abysmal following:Hello Games made No Man's Sky in 3 years with a team of 13, with far less prior expertise than FDEV as a long standing company have. And while it wasn't all that was promised initially, they pulled through, delivered a much more polished game a year later and have been pushing high content updates on a regular basis since.
Oh most definitely they can get far more expensive, at speeds that make light looks slow. And they don't play games worth a darn!If I remeber correctly when new graphical engine was guessed it was more about multiple light sources and other new effects introduced by nVidia that wouldn't probably be compatible with the actual version of the Cobra Engine (only speculation of course).
Considering computers required for engineering simulation I remember I've run few transient thermal analysis on a cluster that is much more expensive than that
Quadrics
The forum users have released more reliable information than FDev did, so I would kindly answer your question with "yes".
what could be feasible or not for this update considering the long wishlist of the community:
- Atmospheric Worlds
- Space Legs: combat and ships interactions, social areas in starports.
- Base Building
- New Missions (for legs and atmospehric worlds)
- New Ships
- New SRV's
- New gameplay on planets (SRV's AI)
- New exploration contents
"Why?"
That is the kind of 'progress' that begs the question "Why?"
My prediction:
The new version will be under-whelming given the timeline, community hopes and hype surrounding it. o7
You are very brave and optimistic man, I applaud you standing!I have no doubt that the update will be a roaring success, that it will unite all players and it will be the end of any complaints for ever and ever.
We will certainly move to a new era.
From the prehistoric era to the era of very high technology.
![]()
Frontier will inevitably off people come the 2020 release.
Just like they have with every other release because simply put people can never manage their own expectations.
I guess if you browse the bug reports you will find valueable content that's missing in FDev patch notes. Let alone changes that weren't listed in the patchnotes and discovered by the community only to be confirmed bc FDev officially 4 months later.Where did that happen ?.
I guess if you browse the bug reports you will find valueable content that's missing in FDev patch notes. Let alone changes that weren't listed in the patchnotes and discovered by the community only to be confirmed bc FDev officially 4 months later.
Frontier will inevitably off people come the 2020 release.
Just like they have with every other release because simply put people can never manage their own expectations.
The forums whiners should at least be in tune by then, after all this practice.
S