We have a 'contact us' form and a submissions form on our website: https://www.sagittarius-eye.com/#contact . We encourage people to let us know about anything they think should receive coverage.
An appeal to Frontier...
- Thread starter Yanick
- Start date
We have a 'contact us' form and a submissions form on our website: https://www.sagittarius-eye.com/#contact . We encourage people to let us know about anything they think should receive coverage.
LOL!
Are you honestly for real? Exploration is all FD think goes on in ED. Try getting a CM to talk or play Powerplay or engage in anything combat / conflict related- subjects that are invisible and ignored.
Ah yes, the eternal battle between who is the biggest calimero: explorers or combat pilots.
Well how many exploration / non combat livestreams have there been compared it to how many Powerplay / combat livestreams? I think a charcoal picture of Denton Patreus is as close PP has gotten so far.
You said:
In contrast with that flawed notion, pretty much 90% of all trailer content is combat. Piles of combat modules have been added. MC is only about combat. SLFs are only about combat. Combat received by far the most attention of anything in ED. I am fine with that, the Elite franchise at its core simply is about combat. But to pretend FD 'thinks exploration is all that goes on' is just laughable, really. We all know you really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really care about PP, but try to keep some sort of reasonable perspective.
No- the OP was talking about FD ignoring Exploration, I'm not talking about trailers- I'm talking about CM and FD livestream topics.
Yes, other than all the attention FD gave and gives to combat they give no attention to combat. How outrageous.
Livestreams show what FD seem to value.
Call me crazy why not pledge to a Power, and fight for them, and keep up with the Sag Eye reports of what goes on to give context? Even CQC got more attention when Ed was about. You could liaise with that Powers player group for things to do.
Plus, why not actually pre engineer some unusual ships so we have interesting battles?
This really sums up the community in honesty
- "They do [Activity A] too much and never do [Activity B]"
- "That's not true"
- "It is, they hate [Activity B] and need to show it more attention!"
- "Here's a link to literally their last stream where they are doing [Activity B]
- "Ok well not THAT [Activity B]. I want them to do [Activity C] in this exact specific way that will make me happy
Why not just admit you were wrong? You keep shifting the goalposts to support some narrative.
So FD do an incredibly basic combat livestream- where is the Powerplay livestreams?
Darn man, I dont even know on which planet the goalposts are at the moment. You claimed 'Exploration is all FD think goes on in ED.'. WHen that was shown to be false you claimed they didn't have combat livestreams. When it was shown how hilariously wrong that was (the most recent one, lol) you just move to yet another lame point. You are wrong, over and over again. You can't admit it, so that makes this a pointless 'discussion'. I suggest screaming into a pillow, the chance it will prove you wrong as well is smaller than if you talk to anyone who knows anything about the game.
Well, as you can see on how the discussion is going, you were quite right.
Also, while it is tangentially exploration based due to being about an event-based expedition outside the bubble, it would have been better posted in Dangerous Discussion - because here in the exploration subforum, we get one dev post every two years or so, so don't expect much in the way of exposure.
Darn man, I dont even know on which planet the goalposts are at the moment. You claimed 'Exploration is all FD think goes on in ED.'. WHen that was shown to be false you claimed they didn't have combat livestreams. When it was shown how hilariously wrong that was (the most recent one, lol) you just move to yet another lame point. You are wrong, over and over again. You can't admit it, so that makes this a pointless 'discussion'. I suggest screaming into a pillow, the chance it will prove you wrong as well is smaller than if you talk to anyone who knows anything about the game.
And Powerplay livestreams, my original point? I seem to recall DW2 having lots of livestream and CM attention. That on its own is more than 5 years of...nothing.
1) You dont get to go 'yeah but what about [x]' after your points keep being proven wrong, and you keep shifting. It means you are not talking in good faith. 2) I dont care about how you try to make every single discussion about powerplay. Powerplay was one part of one patch of one year of updates, almost half a decade ago. It is a very small part of the game, unlike exploration and combat. You may be as fascinated and heavily invested in it as you want, but please just keep it to yourself and topics actually about PP. Thanks.
"I dont care about how you try to make every single discussion about powerplay "
In essence then you can't argue that point but I'm 'wrong' regardless. OK, I'll leave you to it.
In essence then you can't argue that point but I'm 'wrong' regardless. OK, I'll leave you to it.
Yes, people have provided very obvious, clear and irrefutable evidence directly proving your quotes to be false. That you keep walking your "they only care about exploration!" back all the way to some feeble "where is a stream specifically about PowerPlay?" is laughably pathetic.
An open letter without mentioning small seismic charges, I’m sorry the SSCF can’t support this