This Interstellar Initiative is not really "Exciting"

[VR SenseiMatty]

3 trade CG's and 1 Combat CG in Combat Zones only:

• Use of in-game existing assets (low)
• Player engagement (boring and repetitive)
• Rewards (poor)

Is that all?

 

[Mohrgan]

I guess... If your only measure is the value of the rewards.

 

[VR SenseiMatty]

I guess... If your only measure is the value of the rewards.

OP edited to be more clear

 

[Unknown Zombie]

The only thing that really got my goat about this was the kangaroo-court-esque way the scythe of panem was dealt with (the unbelieveability that a group of pot growers would have the resources to pull off something of this magnitude), and that there wasn't an opportunity to legitimately fight on their behalf.

I particularly like the current trade CGs.. they have high tier 1 requirements and low source avilability, which gives them a real feeling that there could be failure. I honestly have to tell FD they did a good job on these.

 

[Turd Ferguson]

This one was barely a step above watching the grass grow.

how about an anti-goid campaign on a megaship with a reward of some new weapon unlocks that don’t require constant synthesis for fighting goids? Or some new anti goid modules/ships balanced for higher level goids?

 

[Mohrgan]

OP edited to be more clear

I remain unimpressed.

 

[Turd Ferguson]

3 trade CG's and 1 Combat CG in Combat Zones only:

• Use of in-game existing assets (low)
• Player engagement (boring and repetitive)
• Rewards (poor)

Is that all?

At least there wasn’t a forum vote

 

[VR SenseiMatty]

I remain unimpressed.

My same feeling for this II. Why don't you explain why do you think it's a good one instead?

 

[Backelaer]

I remain unimpressed.

OP hasn't reached his weekly quota for opening threads I guess

 

[VR SenseiMatty]

OP hasn't reached his weekly quota for opening threads I guess

What's wrong in opening thread? Isn't this a forum all about?
If you guys are tired of making conversation play the game or take a walk outside :O

 

[Drelthar]

Previous ones have been better for sure.

Hopefully this isn't the level future II's will be - however, there were several half decent CG's early on too...

 

[Mohrgan]

My same feeling for this II. Why don't you explain why do you think it's a good one instead?

I'm more impressed with the fast moving story behind the CGs/II. These events are facilitating the story. They make sense, and are a benefit to the galaxy. It's a bigger picture thing, it seems.

 

[FixMeNow]

3 trade CG's and 1 Combat CG in Combat Zones only:

• Use of in-game existing assets (low)
• Player engagement (boring and repetitive)
• Rewards (poor)

Is that all?

100% agree. This one feels like any other community goal.

So many ingame things you could use.

High G planetary bases?
Use Data missions so we can use small ships and not have to basically use the biggest cargo carriers?
Steal specific cargo from megaships?
Thargoids around a station so you have abit of risk trying to dock?

I could probably name more interesting ways to spice it up, feel free to ask FD.

 

[Wolf Starslayer]

Buy more paintjobs , they may choose to improve something if they feeling charitable with our money...

 

[Rubbernuke]

I think what the OP is after is the word 'consequential'.

If the Thargoids were behind it? It would be a clever war tactic.

Angry space hippies? A bit vape shop protest really.

 

[Old Duck]

Well at least it feels meaningful. I much rather save the galaxy from famine than support some rich dude's party by hauling wine and beer.

 

[CmdMarty]

OP hasn't reached his weekly quota for opening threads I guess

Ironic that your posting in his thread! lol

 

[Old Duck]

DUPE

 

[ZAKALWEINC8876]

It is the first II i haven't taken any part in, not my bag really.
But the last one was really really good imo.

o7

 

[DNA-Decay]

A bit vape shop protest really.