Could be worse.You guys drive me crazy. Try not to post one after another please![]()

Hard to find a good monocle.
Could be worse.You guys drive me crazy. Try not to post one after another please![]()
You can't sign a petition that literally says: "We don’t ask for new content", and then turn around and complain that there's no new content.
There are very few issues with the January update, and many were ironed out incredibly quickly. There was a beta. The update included many player-requested changes.
It's like the more FD does, the further the goalposts move.
But the context of the comments you were responding to were thus. Applying different context and then critcizing them for not matching that context doesn't really make a point.fair. the whole petition thing is just an anecdote for me, though. i'll grant you there are possibly personal agendas and other motives but i'm not interested in that at all. it's the game that brings me here, and the state of it (and possible future) what it's about.
Specify this untested code you keep referring to? It's vague.this is true. yet there was untested code in the release. and it blew. that's my point. that code shouldn't have blown but even if it hadn't, it shouldn't be there in the first place. i'm not saying they have done nothing, i'm just highly skeptical.
We've known for a while what the January update was going to include, even with a beta. Then it came out, with the things we were told it was going to have. How are people acting shocked?now you're slipping into absurdland again ...
ezren! come back! stay with me! i promise i'll never mistake you for stigbob again! just allow me a tiny delay while i 'rationalize' my eyesight ...
Uhhm... On topic please ?
I think this thread is a rabies-infected Lassie, and you need to put it downUhhm... On topic please ?
You're thinking of Old Yeller. And, I agree. LOLI think this thread is a rabies-infected Lassie, and you need to put it down
I think this thread is a rabies-infected Lassie, and you need to put it down
TLDR
But I must say that the way I play the game, whatever that is, after the patch to the patch, "Good evening, Dave. Everything's running smoothly."
This is the bestest smoothest VR experience I've had in the game so far. @Fdev: Now, we both know it's possible, so plz. keep it up.
They wouldn't operate at all then. You, as much as anyone, should know this by now.The forums should not operate this way.
But the context of the comments you were responding to were thus. Applying different context and then critcizing them for not matching that context doesn't really make a point.
Specify this untested code you keep referring to? It's vague.
We've known for a while what the January update was going to include, even with a beta. Then it came out, with the things we were told it was going to have. How are people acting shocked?
They wouldn't operate at all then. You, as much as anyone, should know this by now.
why bother having the rules?
I love how it's not possible to just give a complement.... it has to include an insult.
"Wow, honey. You look great tonight! Who knew your fat thighs could fit in those jeans?"
That's dangerous discussion for you. In order to be positive about the game you need to find constant accusations, conspiracies and being called names by furious video-game casualties funny.
I don't see how it was an ad hominem, it didn't really attack anyone specifically and was a commentary on the ridiculous reaction. It even used the words from the title of this thread.the comment i did respond was out of topic, it was simply an ad-hominem (i just tried to explain this 2 posts before) which didn't expand nor on yamiks's show nor on the broader issue of the quality assurance of the game.
"Gamebreaking" stuttering doesn't really match up with the descriptions given by those who experienced it. Inconvenient perhaps, but it passes shortly. Some didn't even encounter the issue at all.the precalc for the geological features that caused gamebreaking stuttering to anyone entering a system with several bodies, whether they had intent to scan them or not.
Rules exist for selective enforcement, to allow a justifiable way to weed out undesirables.But when some posters decide to close a thread by filling it with rubbish, the thread gets moderated instead of the posters who are breaking the rules. This is not how its supposed to work, why bother having the rules? I accept that combing the forum removing posts one by one would be a heavy task. Ill say no more.
Although we have to wait six months, 2020 is the year of reckoning for ED as there is no place left to hide or delay things. I wonder what we will be saying in July?