Likkle isn't even a word though :/Pretty sure that is intentional? Although there are other typos in Zoopedia for instance.
Sure it's not, but it is intentional to make it sound cute like ppl do irlLikkle isn't even a word though :/
Likkle isn't even a word though :/
Wouldn't "wittle" be better then? I've never, ever heard someone say little in "cute speak" in such a way that the Ts are replaced with Ks :/This isn't a typo, it's "Cute speak". Its when you talk in a cute and silly way to something like a puppy or a small child.
"Ikkle, likkle, wikkle, wittle, itty, bitty, teeny, weeny, smol" there's quite a few options for cute speak. The challenge is to use them without your friends disowning you.Wouldn't "wittle" be better then? I've never, ever heard someone say little in "cute speak" in such a way that the Ts are replaced with Ks :/
I mean no offence, but it still seems like a typo. Given that k and l are literally a keystroke away from eachother, it seems a bit disingenuous to say that something like that is intentional.This isn't a typo, it's "Cute speak". Its when you talk in a cute and silly way to something like a puppy or a small child.
Not only that but it messes with my Dyslexia.I mean no offensive, but it still seems like a typo. Given that k and l are literally a keystroke away from eachother, it seems a bit disingenuous to say that something like that is intentional.
I mean no offence, but it still seems like a typo. Given that k and l are literally a keystroke away from eachother, it seems a bit disingenuous to say that something like that is intentional.
Thanks for correcting me. It'll help remind me not to use the forums with a groggy mind.If you replaced 'k' with 'l' you'd get "Lille" which makes even less sense in context so you're the one being disingenuous.
Apparently most people understand the context and what it means, so I'm not sure why you and horse14t can't just accept it for what it is.