General / Off-Topic The safest place

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
And where exactly would you put them? Particularly whilst the ship's alongside in Guam of all places.

They're better off onboard where they've got access to decent food, sickbay and a proper medical team than stepping ashore and potentially dosing the whole island.

Naval Base Guam is quite large and well equipped, relatively speaking, but that many crew would be hard to isolate anywhere and are already overwhelming Guam (both the base and the island).

Why did they pick that spot? Travel time to a better place maybe?

It's about 5-7 days to Hawaii and another 5-7 to the US west coast.

A Nimitz-class carrier can do 60km/hr or so. From Guam to mainland US (california) would take a week or so. Getting an infected ship to dock in a foreign country is tricky. Having your aircraft carrier incapacitated in another nation is less than ideal too.

A week from Guam to California would best the current record, probably by a couple of days. It's one thing to be able to reach ~33knots and quite another to keep up that pace on an actual ocean for a week-plus.
 
This is a really, really good Article of a swiss Prof.Dr.med. Dr. h.c. Amongst some Switzerland specific remarks, he presents a LOT of insight and knowledge re the Pandemic . First the original text, 2nd a Link to the google translated text ( thanks Morbad ) :


 
Last edited:
This is a really, really good Article of a swiss Prof.Dr.med. Dr. h.c. Amongst some Switzerland specific remarks, he presents a LOT of insight and knowledge re the Pandemic . Unfortunatley, I do not know how to create an URL for a Version translated into english, if someone would be so kind to tell me, I will edit this post to link to the translated page :


Just paste the link into Google and copy the "translate this page" shortcut.

Edit: forum itself is mangling the URL, but anyone capable of using Google will be able to get it translated.

Edit2: Manual URL tags worked...
https://translate.google.com/transl...d-zuk%C3%BCnftigen-politischen-entscheidungen
 
Just paste the link into Google and copy the "translate this page" shortcut.

Edit: forum itself is mangling the URL, but anyone capable of using Google will be able to get it translated.

Edit2: Manual URL tags worked...
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://www.mittellaendische.ch/2020/04/07/covid-19-eine-zwischenbilanz-oder-eine-analyse-der-moral-der-medizinischen-fakten-sowie-der-aktuellen-und-zuk%C3%BCnftigen-politischen-entscheidungen

Excellent, thanks, edited my above post .
 
🇹🇹
3 new confirmed cases. Quarantined cruise ship idiots. Seriously, they went on that ship during the pandemic while the Diamond Princess story was on the news every day. This spoils our zero cases run.


Japan is pulling companies out of China. They won't be the only ones.
 
Last edited:
Why not ask the actual captain?

If you actually read the link you shared, you'd see the captain raises the exact same concern I mentioned re: billeting ashore and doesnt answer the question I raise: where you put the crew.

You are right about Guam's capacity, for sure. Why did they pick that spot? Travel time to a better place maybe?
But they can't stay in the close quarters in a closed ventillation system with shared heads. The disease will inevitable hit everyone on board, and that's a strategic ship, not a cruise liner.

The why is fairly clear cut. Its the closest US base to their station, and they'll be the only CVBG available that can achieve objectives out there at the present time until a replacement could MAYBE be put to sea at short notice.

It's a pair of bad choices here, and yes, the people on Guam are at risk.
 
Last edited:
A Nimitz-class carrier can do 60km/hr or so. From Guam to mainland US (california) would take a week or so. Getting an infected ship to dock in a foreign country is tricky. Having your aircraft carrier incapacitated in another nation is less than ideal too.

Its a lot further than that. Transiting across the Pacific is an absolute chore, and they wont be able to do it at top speed, but cruising which (rule of thumb) is about 12-16 knots.

Also remember, its not just a case of withdrawing the carrier: her escort and support ships will need to sail with her as well.
 
Naval Base Guam is quite large and well equipped, relatively speaking, but that many crew would be hard to isolate anywhere and are already overwhelming Guam (both the base and the island).

It isnt sadly. The fact its a 'home port' for SSNs, but relies on a sub tender to service them shows the infrastructure isnt great. My memory of the place was a big warehouse region with a small staff.

The only thing I can see that its got going for it is that I'm sure the Seabees that use it actually have boots on the ground there, so they could throw together temporary accom at a pinch.
 
Its a lot further than that. Transiting across the Pacific is an absolute chore, and they wont be able to do it at top speed, but cruising which (rule of thumb) is about 12-16 knots.

Also remember, its not just a case of withdrawing the carrier: her escort and support ships will need to sail with her as well.

Ah yes, complete forgot about the support ships. But if it really needs to such a ship can get there in a week more or less on its own, no? In any case, my bet is they are at Guam because there simply isn't a serious alternative rather than any special properties of Guam itself. Especially if support ships cant keep up (and I have literally no clue, so defer to your experience) I don't think it is a serious proposition to have an 8 billion dollar carrier on its own with a crippled crew suffering from a poorly understood virus set out for a week+ long journey basically in the middle of nowhere.
 
What I find interesting about this latest twist in the conversation (aside from the curious fact of so many people from Europe interested in an American war ship), is how many people seem to be total experts on all things naval...yet I'm pretty sure only one person offering opinions here actually has any experience with the navy. I thought you guys' expertise was limited to medicine, epidemiology, social policy, all aspects of science both applied and theoretical, being able to predict the climate 100 years from present and reproductive justice. Color me impressed. Starting to feel kind of depressed with my first grade education.
 
Ah yes, complete forgot about the support ships. But if it really needs to such a ship can get there in a week more or less on its own, no? In any case, my bet is they are at Guam because there simply isn't a serious alternative rather than any special properties of Guam itself. Especially if support ships cant keep up (and I have literally no clue, so defer to your experience) I don't think it is a serious proposition to have an 8 billion dollar carrier on its own with a crippled crew suffering from a poorly understood virus set out for a week+ long journey basically in the middle of nowhere.

Theoretically, yes.

Doctrinally speaking however we're talking about the USN, not RN, French or Spanish/Italian Navies. They would never let a carrier sail on its own anywhere. Its not a case of those ships being able to keep up (they're designed to sail as a battlegroup to support the jewel in the crown), more something the USN would never do due to their doctrine.

Mechanically speaking running that length of time flat out would absolute wreck the propulsion plant (not the reactor) and lead at best to a very expensive and lengthy maintenance period.

As I said in an earlier post, she'll be in Guam with the rest of her BG due to an emphasis on trying to balance the covid issue with operational requirements.

Worst comes to the worst, they can then cram everyone back onboard, get any replacements flown into guam and deploy to their station if the brown stuff hits the fan.
 
Last edited:
Theoretically, yes.

Doctrinally speaking however we're talking about the USN, not RN, French or Spanish/Italian Navies. They would never let a carrier sail on its own anywhere. Its not a case of those ships being able to keep up (they're designed to sail as a battlegroup to support the jewel in the crown), more something the USN would never do due to their doctrine.

Mechanically speaking running that length of time flat out would absolute wreck the propulsion plant (not the reactor) and lead at best to a very expensive and lengthy maintenance period.

As I said in an earlier post, she'll be in Guam with the rest of her BG due to an emphasis on trying to balance the covid issue with operational requirements.

Worst comes to the worst, they can then cram everyone back onboard, get any replacements flown into guam and deploy to their station if the brown stuff hits the fan.

Thanks for the info, makes perfect sense. :)
 
From wikipedia....


If things get hairy for me I can always neck a bottle of my mums vitamin D and get my hair dryer out of mothballs.
Sure, of course they did. How else do you expect the deep state to act other than by discrediting him? Personally I think he's right on the money. I like how that wicki entry acts like this is ancient history:)
 
From wikipedia....


If things get hairy for me I can always neck a bottle of my mums vitamin D and get my hair dryer out of mothballs.

Man, imagine being the guy who simultaneously defends Fauci as 'one of the most important people' while simultaneously spreading the garbage-tier alternative facts of fauci-attacking Ayyadurai. Oh lord, I am starting to become concerned that Antifa might side with the space lizards when Jason's imminent American civil war explodes into his equally predicted WW3, while the CCP uses G5 to spread COVID19! 2020 is gonna be wild, yo!

Well the "deep state" dont really need to work hard to discredit him when he's so good at doing it himself.

And just when you think we've hit rock bottom, you get this:

This is a very brilliant enemy. You know, it’s a brilliant enemy. They develop drugs like the antibiotics. You see it. Antibiotics used to solve every problem. Now one of the biggest problems the world has is the germ has gotten so brilliant that the antibiotic can’t keep up with it.

Maybe someone can find a high school teacher to explain the greatest leader in the world why a virus won't respond to antibiotics.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom