I Agree!
Which animals you DON'T want in a game ?
- Thread starter Markiz
- Start date
I Agree!
I think everyone has valid reasons for wanting whatever animal they want as long as its within reality (e.g. no unicorn or woolly mammoth) however, I personally would rather see the devs focus on land or semi-aquatic animals than dolphins or sharks... I love the ocean but I feel like if the devs put ocean animals in the game it would take away from the diversity of land mammals. There are sooo many land mammals in zoos I feel the game needs more diversity in that aspect!
No more insects or arachnids.
That's about it. Otherwise, I'd love pretty much literally anything else.
That's about it. Otherwise, I'd love pretty much literally anything else.
A bit curious, does this stem from a phobia ? (seen some topics about people wanting a option to block those images)
Or do you want more snakes/reptiles as an exhibit animals instead of insects/arachnids.
mno fantasy, scifi, supernatural, or prehistoric creatures, please. it takes away from the real world conservation aspect.
and I really don't care about monkeys of any sort.
and I really don't care about monkeys of any sort.
Nope, no phobias. I've never been afraid of any animal in my life, no matter how many legs it has or doesn't have.
I just want more reptiles: snakes, lizards and turtles.
Personally I think we shouldn't disregard spiders - there are some beautiful coloured spiders (mostly tarantulas) to be added in the game.
The OBT would be a nice change compared to the similar coloured spiders in the game. The Arizona blonde (not sure if they have it in zoos but a great first tarantula pet) has some great colouring. Same goes for the Socotra Island Blue Baboon (not as a beginner species but in colouring)
Same reason why I'd love to see the San Fransisco Garter snake. I know there are other very striking coloured snakes out there. I think the frog in the SA pack was a great addition to the exhibit species for the same reason
Thank you. Understood.
I still would like more African species. Meerkats, rhinos, and penguins (African would be one of the most realistic for a zoo) are all very popular.
I don't think there's a good reason not to include, say, the Malayan sun bear, which looks and behaves completely differently to any of the current in-game bears.
I would also really like them in the Game. Aren't they also having a really long Tongue compared to other Bears or am I confusing them with another Bear
They do have a long tongue, but they aren't as famous for it as the sloth bear, which eats out of termite mounds. Sun bears are the big climbers of the bear-world, though, moreso than any other bear, likely by virtue of their habitat being the tropical rainforests.
They do also look great. I wish we could get both of them in the Game but I think a lot of People wouldn't like it if we get 2 more Asian Black Bears. If I would need to choose between them, I would choose the Malayan Sun bear
Neither is an Asian black bear. They are descended, but are entirely separate species.
Yes, they aren't even in the same Genus. I should've written Black Bears from Asia instead
No mythical creatures, no dinosaurs and please no more dogs/wulfs.
The animals I don't want Planet Zoo to have are the ones that cannot be bred, cannot last in captivity, and never been captive nowadays. For example: Javan rhinos, mountain gorillas, and indris. Also, extinct ones and mythical ones. One to two subspecies of each species should be enough to me. Also, the only marine animals I prefer and want Planet Zoo to have are pinnipeds (seals and sea lions).
Last edited: