Don't worry, this style of correction makes me progress.
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
Correct. The french "effectivement" (indeed) always makes me do this mistake.
They're too busy playing Star Wars and making a list of all the "refactoring" they now need to do to Squadron 42.
And no, I know SW doesn't step on all of S42's toes, but it seems to (from what I've played so far) be pretty good at what it sets out to achieve, unlike anything CIG has produced. And what it achieves is basically exactly what Wing Commander did back in the day, only with a quarter of a century of technology and game play advancements. That's the basic concept which led to a lot of us being here, after we backed Roberts in 2012 to make a spiritual successor to his earlier games. At least someone delivered.
Also, SW is awesome in VR.
(But yes, the HOTAS support is complete bobbins)
Oh god, i wasted my time on that video. Half of it is a rant against redditors in general.
Poor members of /r/trains who are just enjoying their time talking about trains.
Poor members of /r/trains who are just enjoying their time talking about trains.
Uuuuhhhhg. Finally caught up. This thread is moving really fast... I've got a couple of comments over the last 70 pages:
Hud modes are fine for me. All the aircraft I've flown that have radar, glass panel displays or MFD's have various levels of overlays or modes that make ED look like a preschool toy. I'll take it.
I'm having fun with Squadrons outside of my throttle not being detected. X-wings are still my favorite starfighter after all these years evidently.
Hud modes are fine for me. All the aircraft I've flown that have radar, glass panel displays or MFD's have various levels of overlays or modes that make ED look like a preschool toy. I'll take it.
I'm having fun with Squadrons outside of my throttle not being detected. X-wings are still my favorite starfighter after all these years evidently.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style>
.fecal_matter_stirring {
background-color: tomato;
color: white;
border: 2px solid black;
margin: 20px;
padding: 20px;
some other colorful css trolling declarations here;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<trolling class="fecal_matter_stirring">
<a href="
Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1j_myAO6STE
">Starring The Sterling @Agony_Aunt at 4:07</a>
</trolling>
</body>
</html>
<html>
<head>
<style>
.fecal_matter_stirring {
background-color: tomato;
color: white;
border: 2px solid black;
margin: 20px;
padding: 20px;
some other colorful css trolling declarations here;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<trolling class="fecal_matter_stirring">
<a href="
">Starring The Sterling @Agony_Aunt at 4:07</a>
</trolling>
</body>
</html>
Last edited:
I started out with assembler about 40 years ago, but ended up coding websites and oracle databases. This has given me absolutely no understanding of game development. As far as I'm concerned it's all magic. So I can't see how your 98% web has given you insight into game design and development.
I switched to playing Squadrons with an Xbox controller...as it was presumably designed. Binned the HOTAS due to the hard coded 50% deadzones that EA have inserted into the control setup..it's awful.
Ooooh, talk machine code to me baby!
JMP
XOR
JNE
BNE
I love it!
Of course, when i started, we didn't even have that level of abstraction, our code looked like this:
4F 23 0A etc
And we input that in via a keypad, and if you discovered later you needed to insert a command, you had to go back and overwrite everything.
Bah, developers today, they don't know how good they have it! We used to have to push our stacks uphill, in the snow, just to get a FILO result! And we were greatful for it!
Jeez, that sounds terrible.
Just to reiterate a bit about why folks are having issues with using a HOTAS in Squadrons...
Aye, them were the days, when our computers were powered by coal. Actually, I suppose they still are to a certain extent.
Best not. He's a nutter.
I cant help but think that in that vid Reddit convo that AA was trying to see how few words they could write to get a full page response. Started with a reasonable paragraph and by the end of it was down to one sentence. Interested to see if in future they can get a full page response for fewer and fewer word, down to three words 'So you say', or two words, 'Not really' or even just one word. Just by replying 'Really?'
I wouldn't want to be around or anywhere near these guys when CIG unravels. When fanatics snap the collateral damage can be pretty ugly to say the least.
Last edited:
Never mind. I found it. It was fairly obvious from his video's thumbnail on the refunds sub reddit. He needs help.
I've read that they are going to rush out a patch for this, not sure why they would release it untested.
I have an X56 so I'll be holding off till its sorted.
Dead zone sliders were like the only HOTAS options I found. But yeah, dump it, it’s not worth the faff. Game is fine with controller. (No 6dof or anything to be crammed into the controls etc, like you said. S’all good. Once you mess with the presets
)-
On the topic of Squadrons:
Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/j3uhdc/6_weeks_on_and_still_no_update_on_the_new_roadmap/