Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12

Dead zone sliders were like the only HOTAS options I found. But yeah, dump it, it’s not worth the faff. Game is fine with controller. (No 6dof or anything to be crammed into the controls etc, like you said. S’all good. Once you mess with the presets ;))

-

On the topic of Squadrons:

Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/j3uhdc/6_weeks_on_and_still_no_update_on_the_new_roadmap/


And this thread:


was a sticky at the top of the forum until yesterday or the day before, when it was quietly un-stickied.
 
Not so much the whole company. Just the giant thumb at the top.

Have said it before, there is no flippity flip way the rest of the company is unaware of the sales practices and perpetual development. A paycheck is a paycheck after all, at the same time, they are all just as culpable.

I work in development since 30 years (98% web)

Claims to have worked in web development for 30 years. Web, outside CERN, has only existed for 28 years. Is either Tim Berners-Lee himself - Hiya Tim - or full of horse manure/outright trolling.

So they effectively manage the project in a way never been done before and they don't care about some common rules of managment.

Yup, straight up trolling. Effectively manage my raging erection (sorry kids).

JMP
XOR
JNE
BNE

Brah, don't tell me to eff myself.

Of course, when i started, we didn't even have that level of abstraction, our code looked like this:

Real programmers only use magnets, flipping bits one at a time.
 
Bootcha said:
Speaking of outside contractors...

shrach said:
It has been a few months but it is time for CLOUD IMPERIUM UK LTD to once again **** about with its share capital.
The info hasn't been processed by Companies House yet but on the face of it, I think they have reduced the nominal share capital from 1.1million shares with a par value of nothing, to fewer, I don't know 100,000 shares maybe also with a par value of nothing.

There will be a statement about how they are good for all their debts and such to accompany this move. On the face of it this is another pointless move so maybe there is some point to it. The total share capital remains £117.158 apparently but perhaps some shares have changed hands.
Say shrach, you remember that loan charge from 2017 that went to Icesprite?

Guess who filed?

unknown.png

unknown.png


Look up Icesprite, Firesprite, Firesprite Games Ltd, and Fabrik Games.

https://www.firesprite.com/careers/pages/lead-designer/
https://www.firesprite.com/careers/pages/senior-technical-level-designer-1/
https://www.firesprite.com/careers/pages/game-designer-1/
https://www.firesprite.com/careers/pages/senior-principal-environment-artist-1/

All have a common man: Graeme Anker. Who is Graeme Anker? Doesn't sound like a Roberts family connection.

Turns out, it's an Elms family connection.

https://www.mobygames.com/developer/sheet/view/developerId,75360/
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/retro-gamer/20180222/281651075574034
Pixelate said:
Oh, the CFO who didn't spot the Gizmondo mafia stuff.

So, at it's most innocent, this just fits with the deal all being dialled up in 2017? It predates the Calders etc. It's something the old guard got moving.

(And at it's least innocent, there's an old pally connection there, and if they really wanted to shuttle money or staff about or whatever, these might be guys who'd play ball. Not that I think you're implying this as such?)
shrach said:
Okay, so I was wrong in what I guessed Cloud Imperium UK Ltd had done.

So what they have in fact done, is moved £1m from the share premium account to a new special reserve, reducing the £23.7m to £22.7m in the share premium account.

Since the company is technically insolvent, there are restrictions on what they can do with cash they have, which they only have via the share premium account. Namely pay dividends.

Goodman Jones said:
A common frustration
A number of our private international clients – including Russian, Italian, Spanish and US companies – have seen real benefit from this change in Company Law.

We recently worked with a Russian group that owns a UK company with valuable intellectual property rights. The UK subsidiary did not have reserves large enough to pay dividends, but it held a fair amount of cash that it wished to distribute back to the parent. It also had a large share premium reserve. The group assumed it would be difficult to declare a dividend – as it would be in Russia. Specifically, they expected to be involved in a difficult and lengthy process involving large legal fees. Yet the directors were surprised by how easy and quick it was to create distributable reserves from their current structure and declare a dividend back to the parent company.

Another of our clients, an Italian fashion chain with a UK subsidiary, was historically loss-making because of its expensive location. The subsidiary had then started making profits, but again had insufficient reserves to declare a dividend. We advised the group to undertake a capital reduction in order to convert the share premium reserve into a distributable reserves. Although, they were aware that this could be done, they were concerned about the cost and the time commitment. They were staggered by the ease with which the process was completed.

The only logical reason to do this is if you want to take £1m out of the technically insolvent company that is only propped up by a recent infusion of capital. Very odd. If they do declare a dividend, it won't be public until December of the year after when the accounts are filed. Such a small amount though, perhaps they will repeat this process in future.

Here's their accompanying statement saying they are a solvent company for the next 12 months. Erin possibly spoiling a feature of Odyssey expansion by signing ED Robots.

[timg]https://i.imgur.com/HHkoMBD.jpg[/timg]
shrach said:
You can see at a glance what they are doing there and the different approach that they have learned. The money comes in and the money gets spent. A year later they get a tax credit that is basically 20% of expenditure.

These guys are just saying, we'll just go ahead and pay the tax credits out as dividends to the shareholders. In this case the parent company. It's a much neater and consistent way of handling it than the various ways CI(G) have used over the years.

The tax figure of £330,800 (as opposed to tax of (£330,800) with brackets) is the same as the profit figure of £330,800. It's a rebate and because they spend exactly what they received, the tax credit is equal to the profit to the penny.
DigitalPenny said:
The finical statement seams to me like someone failed maths terribly, I must be missing something.

Can i take the significance of this is that it looks like fire sprite is hiring to develop star citizen because this elms chap was mates with Erin in the 90's? CIG brand really is trash.

Also this elms chap was credited with the "the lost bear" 2017.... I'd say the bear is still lost.
 
30 years in development, not 30 years in web development. My professionnal career is at 98% about web.
29.4 then? :rolleyes:

Whatever, obviously trolling after such statements:
LittleAnt said:
So they effectively manage the project in a way never been done before and they don't care about some common rules of managment.

The only things effectively managed by CIG are ship sales and the various director's bank accounts.
 
29.4 then? :rolleyes:

The only things effectively managed by CIG are ship sales and the various director's bank accounts.
98% of my career of developer, not my time as developer. I started my web company only 22 years ago.
The 'effectively' was a really bad translation error, sorry. Read 'indeed' instead. The 'never done before' is just factual. I don't say it's good or bad, just that CIG don't care about deadline as the rest of the gaming industry.
 
Back
Top Bottom