Having per-tier goals probably helps a lot there by giving more gradations of success.
Keep 'em keen.I thought we had similar at the end of the the other CGs? Or maybe the IIs? Maybe I'm misremembering.
But take the Evacuation one. One side completely failed to even rescue one megaship. 2 Tiers reached, all prep done and nothing. I just cant see that being 'acceptable' to the 'community' a year ago without vast amounts of accusations of incompetence or fixed or just salt. Maybe I have a jaded view of the forums back then, dunno. I aint complaining now, more amazed at how well we have taken failure and accepted it as 'better' than before even.
I havent seen anyone complain they were in the bottom 25% and didnt get the missile rack?
Like I say, I may have jaded view of the past and the salt, maybe I read them more or something, but it just seems like a 'better' community at the moment. Regardless of which side youre on or how you play, theres much more discourse and less slanging matches and blame....maybe lockdown means less angry commuters in society at large![]()
Less than 18 bil left for completion - 25h left.
Honestly, I will not be surprised if we hit tier 5.
The superpower CGs in the Enclave to determine how many Witch Head stations are the only ones I can think of where the tier goals did something during the IIs ... and there were a couple of competing CGs of course.I thought we had similar at the end of the the other CGs? Or maybe the IIs? Maybe I'm misremembering.
I think that's mainly an indicator of who posts on the forums at all - because of the distribution, anyone who puts a bit of effort in and has a high-end ship will get the 75% tier. Inara's estimates on the current CG have top 75% starting at 320k ... even if that goes up a bit, it's unlikely to go up so much that a single Cyclops kill won't do it. There really won't be many people who thought their top 75% place was secure and then get knocked out of it before the end of the CG, and I think the same was probably true last time.I havent seen anyone complain they were in the bottom 25% and didnt get the missile rack?
I would agree - even Dangerous Discussion seems a bit less grumpy than normal. I think that's probably because things are happening:Like I say, I may have jaded view of the past and the salt, maybe I read them more or something, but it just seems like a 'better' community at the moment.
1 | 5,669,630,300 | 8.824% |
2 | 11,902,260,100 | 18.523% |
3 | 16,267,071,500 | 25.316% |
4 | 15,952,088,600 | 24.826% |
5 | 14,464,509,800 | 22.511% |
To be fair, I am a bit sad seeing so many people are doing instagibs(solo and wing)
That's not AX combat
I know that this is still contributing to the CG but nevertheless I feel bad from just seeing those.
Taking advantage of premium synthesis and/or large wing to kill weak interceptors in 5-10 sec.I dont understand what this means? Instagibs?