I dont screenshot every rude at that I see talking in local. Yet it was there. I saw you being rude to someone you had ganked that yes he shouldnt have been in open. However player like you are the reason most dont watch local and stay in pg because you get your jollies off abusing other players.
ANNOUNCEMENT Game Balancing Pt.3
I dont screenshot every rude at that I see talking in local. Yet it was there. I saw you being rude to someone you had ganked that yes he shouldnt have been in open. However player like you are the reason most dont watch local and stay in pg because you get your jollies off abusing other players.
What is the earnings cap on missions? Previously it was/is 50,000,000. Has this changed?
And if it hasn't would this affect the increased payout on combat bonds for the Thargoid Hydra which is currently 15,000,000 set to increase to 60,000,000 this afternoon.
Pirates aren't gankers. Neither are soldiers.
Just because the mark chose option B of "your money or your life" doesn't make a pirate a ganker.
Just because the person opposing another person in a war fled the CZ and the soldier managed to chase them down and interdict them doesn't make a soldier a ganker.
I agree a curve rather than linear progression would be fair. Having said that, 8m cr + better-than-Elite Combat rank gain + gameplay that is still quite new to me = me going to solo Cyclopses tonight.
Sardoc..this is not about removing the option to avoid open. Weighing open a little heavier because it is more dangerous would not mean that you had to worry about consoles. And no it is not ABSURD that it should be balanced or discussed.
There's the "Pirate Activity Detected" signal sources - high-ranked and engineered pirate enemies. Needs a controlling faction in Civil Unrest or Lockdown, so they move around.
Also Combat Zones, of course.
The thing about scouts was that they were individually relatively easy kills compared with an engineered and tanked up NPC. But finding Deadly/Elite targets isn't a problem.
![[VR] Bulbulunufus](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/261/261245.jpg?1671230473){kind=avatar}
The obvious answer is to have representatives on different platforms. For powerplay groups, this is invariably the case. In star trek discovery, they didn't stop bothering because they were in a parallel reality. Here those realities have direct impacts on each other via unified PP system. The argument is also garbage because it comes down to "if you can't interact with some people (on other platforms) you shouldn't be able to interact with anybody at all (even on our own platform)".
Another reason scouts were popular was the bugged AX CZ that would give you a constant supply of scouts so you could almost AKF your way to Elite. Also one of the reasons there have been such plaintive cries about the AX CZ going missing ...
More like 5 - 10 minutes to kill a Cyclops, then back to the FC/Station to repair, then go out again.
I can't think of a time where I have had enough hull left to risk a second kill before repairing.
After that, the game can be closed immediatelyTo be honest Bruce, I've hypothesised that as part of "Odyssey's Release" The Bank of Zaonce get's destroyed by the Thargoids, and EVERYONE goes back to 100cr and a Sidewinder- Well maybe not that extreme, but maybe a 'liveable' credit reset, maybe 100,000,000 or so for those with a balance > 1B
This work is having a positive impact on the game so thanks for continuing to look into these issues.
Yes, only the reaction to the wrong feedback
What would you have preferred, out of interest?
I don't think your average pilot is killing cyclops in 5 minutes.
It's possible to find the proposal interesting while highlighting flaws!
It is flawed, but FDev have no reason to apply it wrote - I hope they don't. The thread overall presumably highlights the flaws (I noticed useful comments from yourself).
You know, in all the games in which I have met such a balancing of the economy, they ended in the collapse of projects within a year. I’ll be very sorry if ED dies. But nothing, we will add Fdev to the blacklist of developers and find other projects
Has this gone live yet?
Are you the other friend of Bazmeson's ?
Ref Kai's crime and punishment proposal: I don't think heavily disincentivising player killing and nerfed influence impact in private group/solo are incompatible. Yes, it'll be harder and more risky to hunt players supporting a faction in high and medium security systems, but arguably the outcomes of that won't be less desirable than what we have now. There are other ways to oppose a faction in Open than simply killing players who support it.
The status quo is unnopposable bots steamrolling players in solo mode. Pretty undesirable IMO.
The status quo is unnopposable bots steamrolling players in solo mode. Pretty undesirable IMO.