Slave Carriers Update

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Interesting, I did not know destroying a player ship with mission tourists on board adversely effected the BGS. (waits for Ian Doncaster to come along and confirm)
Yep. You'll fail the missions as a result, and get -ve influence, rep and economy (in the case of tourists. If your transporting say, security personnel, it would be -ve security)

This is because failing missions achieves full negative BGS effects, as opposed to abandoning, which just results in negative rep.
 
All in all, it certainly is a twist in the tale and a start with a bang for everyone who actually acquired ED and the first thing that happened to them was being hijacked by Space-8channers.
 
Galactic Troll !!!
Your mother never taught you not to enter the Carrier of whom you do not know !?
Well done!!!

It is precisely these things that make the game live.
As far as I know, Elite is Dangerous, it's in the title.
Freedom of choice and player activity should not be undermined in this way
I have been through a situation very similar to unknown carriers, and honestly, I laughed a lot at my stupidity, and for that reason I didn't feel less able to survive this situation, or self-destruct, in that case
 
All in all, it certainly is a twist in the tale and a start with a bang for everyone who actually acquired ED and the first thing that happened to them was being hijacked by Space-8channers.

Reminds me a little bit of that early explorer who wrote about returning to bubble with a load of data and welcomed the idea of people meeting him .. then someone blew him up. That wasn't very nice either but it made the papers and now I imagine most explorers are a bit more circumspect!
 
Yep. You'll fail the missions as a result, and get -ve influence, rep and economy (in the case of tourists. If your transporting say, security personnel, it would be -ve security)

This is because failing missions achieves full negative BGS effects, as opposed to abandoning, which just results in negative rep.

Ah yer of course forgot about the fail part, so same result with self destruct ?
 
i think the slavers were dirty. but this makes fdev worse than the slavers. what happened was a very unique and interesting player interaction. people making people slaves people saving the slaves. it fit perfectly in the game. its not right to punish the slavers. free the slavers!
 
If this turns out to be true, then I'd be pretty disappointed in frontier. I mean, blowing up newbies with overpowered ships is ok, but in game, in character "trickery" where in the end, even though it was a crappy move, these newbies still made money and learned mining and were "rescued" by other players.... those "slavers" shouldnt be punished at all. I mean seriously, we have slaves already in the game!
 
.... argh. I just waded though that pilot interview with the slavers.

Its pretty certain that they're bad actors and don't mean well.

I don't recommend watching that video though, he gives carebears a bad name. Really this one was a struggle.

No opinion on the action taken, though i could see how frontier simply decided they don't want those people in the game anymore.

Slaver Guy: We are NOT slavers, come on. People are making crazy accusations, we were helping new players more than anything.

Five minutes later in interview...

Slaver Guy:
Okay fine, I'm a slaver. Not only that, but I actually sold slave-players to other slavers in the game.

I took a lot of crap the other day and was accused of being a "pearl clutcher" and stuff, but that interview ends the debate I'm sorry. This guy is toxic scum lol.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 182079

D
OK I feel this is important before links start getting posted:
Please use https://web.archive.org/ to stop the clickbait. They prey on outrage and should be stopped :p

Here's the Polygon link using web archive:

It claims it has official Frontier response.
I don't normally frequent Polygon but had a look (thanks for the link btw), I had to stop at the point where I learned that apparently you can delegate supervision of a minor to ... another minor:unsure:

The tone of the piece from the very outset made it impossible for me to continue reading it. Awful stuff (and they even manage to misspell a simple six-letter word like "image" - quality journalism all round).
 
Do we have ANY REAL evidence that FD have done ANYTHING other than publish a Galnet article warning noobs against a potential scam.

I can't be ARX'd with trawling every social media site in the world, to read about ED......I only stick with this forum & I've seen ZERO evidence of what poster's say frontier have done, other than the Galnet post🤷‍♂️
The people who done it have announced that action was taken against them, lf you have discord i can show you it.
 
So about C&P and various "clever ideas how we can put these guys down"... Stop, please.
I think they should be locked in actual prison systems with a special sidewinder with a Supercruise-only drive (no hyperspace drive) and they have to do missions and activities in the system to pay their fines to get out. That would make million dollar fines a pain in the a** and actually mean something.
I'd agree, untill I was at the end of the stick. These being new players, they are probably driven away in droves. Not something I'd want as a developer.

And which in-game rule have they broken? Because it's totally on as @Tobias Saffron quite eloquently put it, for creating a sandbox where you really cannot drive your plastic shovel smack on the head of other rug-rat who is constantly kicking your sand castle you try to build. Consequences-free world, truly a dystopia. They have created the indestructable fleet carriers and meaningless C&P system which is also a simulation of our real world law - small ones get caught, big ones laugh and ask for a snap on another wrist.

I am also 100% sure that game taking away someone's FSD would totally not be "slavery" and "imprisonement" and would surely not drive players out of game. I always say if you want to go all-out on punishments, by all means do but flesh out "criminal career" and "lawful career" first... One can dream, can I? That a proper notoriety system would exist which puts more severe restrictions on repeated player killers, but ALSO opens up very high-risk criminal opportunities where you can easily die (think bank heist irl) ultimately leading to new gameplay loops - avoiding hi-sec systems and bounty hunters? That a proper "lawful respect" system would exist which gives you trade and authorities but ALSO paints a target on your back for the people from the former group, for assassination purposes? All the unlawful see in elite is the end of the stick, and criminal activities do not pay really well, they're also of little consequence to anything... but if we want a dystopia where there's no evil, something almost straight out of Minority Report, then, well... it sounds boring.

Don't do it FDEV. "It's a cuthroat galaxy" "Blaze you're own trail" will ring hollow. First bit of emergent gameplay for years and it's going to be crushed :( This could have been great, slaver carriers vs liberator carriers, all tracking each other through the galaxy, battling for the souls of the gullible. Just let it alone FD.

And FWIW, as an exploration carrier owner, I can tell you that my carrier has a slave too. ME. How about you free me from my endentured servitude (upkeep and mining Petril or whatever they call it these days) while you are at it?
I think they way it's exploded into the media (especially that one article that labelled it "slavery") meant that PR wise they had to be seen to do something.

"Will ring hollow"? It rings hollow for a few years now.
I also see this as a wasted opportunity - the only one reaction should be galnet article warning people, and helping player-driven initiatives. Support also could contact the people affected and offer them a "ride home", though with the existence of benevolent players with their fleet carriers like @varonica who I recall went to rescue a stranded cmdr previously, groups like Fuel Rats and Hull Seals - it isn't really necessary for a "hand of god" approach. If they wanted, they could organise an in-game event of rescuing the slaves, I think Federation would be most interested in leading a show of force mission, bringing the perpetrators to justice, trial etc. (galnet lore), and if the public is that bloodthirsty, as a result of these trials stripping the players of their carriers or even wiping their saves... But that's really harsh for in-game behaviour, unless there's dirty evidence we're not aware of, like chat abuse or something. But as @Bigmaec wrote, half of Borann should be shadowbanned by that standard.

This whole issue also underpins the weakness of the tutorials which weren't looked upon for ages. Why not ask the community for the scenarios, and teach the importance of fuel scoop and a rebuy. Do a simulated rebuy event, make the player do 2-3 missions to recoup the cost or something... It would go a long way. Even the voice-over character should warn people that "not everybody you meet in space will be kind" or any other similar "wisdom".

This "hands of god approach" is hilarious while bots are running rampant, powerplay loopholes are being exploited since forever, combat logging is a thing, gankers ganking and bragging about bounties (that's actuall okay in my book, they're within the rules of the sandbox created). But a carrier owner coming up with a scheme? BAN THE HERETIC because "think of the children"? Seriously?

As said, the whole story is mildly amusing to me. If there were threats, and abusive talk etc, a ban is ok.
The mere extorting of players to work for them is quite fitting for the dystopian setting.
Unless the dystopian setting you aim for is one where evil is completely eliminated by the power of an all-seeing-god :)
As you point out, unless the 'slavers' asked for money, ARX, were idiots in ingame chat (i.e. use abusive language) then I don't get it. FD seem to want emergent gameplay but don't like emergent gameplay that is not looking at planets. My guess is that (just like DE) it embarrassed FD enough to warrant slapped wrists.
It would be nice for FD to actually clarify what they see as being 'acceptable' because otherwise its yet another straitjacket. I'd also be interested in knowing if they (FD) took Discord behaviour into account as well, which would be outside the remit I imagine(?)

It is ironic though that Zemina uses slaves to mine. Will anyone think of the children?

Quite right cmdr.........Remember the Gnosis!!

It's a game, in a few month's time we're gonna be jumping out from behind rocks & shooting player's in the head. There has & will be worst things that happen in ED than this 'slavery' b.s.

Some people never learn......be careful what you wish for........a carebear version of ED will be the death of the game for sure!

The Gnosis is the most exemplary reason of in-game deceit I couldn't think of a better one myself. Well, maybe the free anaconda at Hutton. PLEASE FDEV DON'T SHADOWBAN ME!
And regarding jumping out from behind rocks... I won't be at all surprised if it will be PvE like destiny with a few "crucible-like" PvP zones thrown in to placate PvPers. I don't care either way, but I think some will be sorely disappointed.

I'd also like to hear an official stance from a community manager on this issue, @Arthur Tolmie could you weight in on this? Is Elite shooting for the PG-3 rating right now? If we are to be playing within a set of rules, please define them, not act as a schizophrenic game admin who chooses the evil he wants to deal with, completely ignoring the others.
 
Last edited:
So, if this is true, my only complaint is how Frontier basically gave them the recognition and then covertly did a full 180°, just like they did by omission with many of the gold rushes for months/years before fixing them. The galnet article basically recognized it as an activity and tried to educate players against it, instead of a ToS breach that players should be filling reports for.

They should've recognized the ToS breach from the start - this is being done with players that have no awareness of the game and leaving them with a very bad first impression. Enjoying that is like enjoying the culture of hazing at universities or workplaces. They can go pretty out of control and result in psychological scars, physical ones or even death. If a player ends up quitting the game for good because of this terrible first impression - it's effectively the worst possible consequence for Frontier. And now you get some pretty click baity stuff in the press comparing it to slavery, that's as bad PR as it can get.
 
Treat everyone kindly? Their discord is full of racist slurs. They use the name from Hitler's favorite panzer division. But they don't want thier feelings hurt?

Didn't know he was such a fan of the 21st century US Army. 😄🤦‍♂️

But mission accomplished, their narrative is already out there.
 
Imagine a community goal with the objective to bring all slaves back home in escape pods, while doing piracy against the slavers and holding the slaver carriers in that system for one week.

If the pirates succeeded, the ex-slaves would receive part of the money they lost to the slavers. Much better than just remove the credits from them.

If I knew that was happening, I would gladly send my carrier to the rescue. The thing is, unfortunately I didn't see any call for help in time.

o7
 
This "hands of god approach" is hilarious while bots are running rampant, powerplay loopholes are being exploited since forever, combat logging is a thing, gankers ganking and bragging about bounties (that's actuall okay in my book, they're within the rules of the sandbox created). But a carrier owner coming up a scheme? BAN THE HERETIC because "think of the children"? Seriously?
I'm not sure what is so difficult to understand in it. A bunch of bad actors run a scam to fool a handful of new players with typical modern internet hallmarks of xchan-racism and biowaste'n'giggles thrown in, their operation surfaces in the media in a very negative way and gets cracked down. Of course it gets a different priority than - say - combat logging.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom