I redacted what I said due to me only noticing your second reply.
Slave Carriers Update
- Thread starter Either
- Start date
- Status
I redacted what I said due to me only noticing your second reply.
Freedom for our people.
So when Frontier made its decision apparently for reputational reasons the commercial implications of either action or inaction didn't play a part?
That's where we differ I don't find their approach conservative. How many bans did they give the Commandos who attempted to troll the DoveEnigma event? How many perma bans did they hand out when engineering cheating was rife. I ask about those events because both were covered in the gaming press. Surely you accept if this current event caused reputational damage then surely there was commensurate damage during the two events I mentioned.
It's more a rhetorical question btw because neither one of us are able to measure the reputational or financial damage but last I heard Frontier was doing fine.
Indeed they do and if they were sensitive to the will and whims of the forum and Polygons latest moral panic then the only share holders would be David Braben and Tencent.
Ozric
Volunteer Moderator
![[PS4] Lorenzo Waringos](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/234/234580.jpg?1612617334){kind=avatar}
The writer of the first post that appears on page 42 wins the once in a lifetime offer of being able to land on my FC, have goods transferred to them, to the value of the ship that their heart desires, (as long as it is a mining Krait) and join me in a mystery tour around the hotspots of the universe.
Edited to add, no one with a 10 year old sister need apply. You're not welcome.
Edited to add, no one with a 10 year old sister need apply. You're not welcome.
You have a carrier, whats its name?
I thought Beigegate and LEP threads of years past had revealed that 100 pages was the benchmark for an essentially empty response from FDEv which does nothing to move the discussion forward, so I guess it must be something else
The Spirit of the Age.
and its Location because I totally won't land on it and fill it with biowaste.
Last edited by a moderator:
Sag A*
Oof no thanks you can keep your secrets!
I wholly disagree. Having "bad intentioned" players is part of the fun on this game. People aren't all "good", and there's a near zero chance that will change in 1300 years, or ever. It's far more realistic with the option for people to run around being awful to others - and give many a chance to fight against it. If you want that kind of game, maybe one that talks about "blazing a trail in a hostile galaxy" isn't for you to play in multiplayer.
Oops, prank call, prank call.
Its a fair observation. Perhaps there is something about this particular coverage that makes it stand out (think about the children!). Perhaps Frontier are not consistent in their behaviour. Perhaps different people were making those decisions in the different examples. Its all speculation this thread - we dont actually know for sure regardless of how much conviction we may personally have in our opinions.
And none of this will make much material (financial) difference either way - but that in of itself doesn't wholly dictatate how people make decisions.
Last edited:
Frontier is a master at inconsistency.
proxyalpha
Banned
I am wholeheartedly on the side of the Slavers and I am willing to do it with my own Fleet Carriers, just to stick it up to them.
It's happening people one more page to go!!
Deleted member 182079
D
fReE cAnDy
proxyalpha
Banned
@LeoBartlet Wait why, where's the first thread?
- Status