Slave Carriers Update

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

Red Anders

Red Anders
Un1k0rn said:
And then took the nuclear option.

Again, entirely within FD's rights.
Click to expand...

If you notice nobody is actually disputing that it's within their rights, if they want to they can ban everybody and don't have to give any of us a reason for it. They own the game. What people are doing is engaging in a discussion about the relative wisdom of it as a course of action, the various precedents that are set by that course of action and the implications of same, set against a background of at best semi-transparent rules. That's all really.
 

Deleted member 110222

D
Red Anders said:
If you notice nobody is actually disputing that it's within their rights, if they want to they can ban everybody and don't have to give any of us a reason for it. They own the game. What people are doing is engaging in a discussion about the relative wisdom of it as a course of action, the various precedents that are set by that course of action and the implications of same, set against a background of at best semi-transparent rules. That's all really.
Click to expand...
Fair.
 

Bigmaec

Bigmaec
proxyalpha said:
Arbitrary rule set is arbitrary and man-made and should cave if enough people demand for LatexRoach to be freed
Click to expand...
I suggest a diversified plan:

1) write an open letter here
2) petition a semi-well known youtuber ("influenza") to make a clickbait video
3) spam the next 4 livestreams with "freedom for LatexRoach" constantly
4) kill all noobs in Deciat
5) ?
6) profit

That'll teach them.
 

[PS4] Lorenzo Waringos

[PS4] Lorenzo Waringos
Page 42 was never the real page to worry about, that is why we saw that dreadful post at the top of it, the one written by the rejected organ. No, it's page 64 you have to look out for, 'When I'm 64', #WISF
 

Lev -Shadow- Arris

Lev -Shadow- Arris
Starshot_Jigawatts said:
You opened with a statement about learning life lessons. Well, maybe the slaver has now learned one too? No money was lost, no real harm was done to him either right? So he was banned to solo and lost a Fleet Carrier. Meh, it's just pixels right?? It's just a game. So that argument goes both ways I think. Surely we can't place the burden of all this entirely on the victims can we?
Click to expand...

The "slavers" have actually lost something: their ability to play a game they paid for. If FDev wants to Shadow Ban them, they should instead simply offer them a refund as single-player is clearly not what these people paid for. They are, in fact, the most harmed individuals in this as the "slaves" never lost the ability to actually play the game.
 

[PS4] Lorenzo Waringos

[PS4] Lorenzo Waringos
Lev -Shadow- Arris said:
The "slavers" have actually lost something: their ability to play a game they paid for. If FDev wants to Shadow Ban them, they should instead simply offer them a refund as single-player is clearly not what these people paid for. They are, in fact, the most harmed individuals in this as the "slaves" never lost the ability to actually play the game.
Click to expand...

I was harmed witnessing this story unfold and so was my wife!
 

Factabulous

Factabulous
Lev -Shadow- Arris said:
The "slavers" have actually lost something: their ability to play a game they paid for. If FDev wants to Shadow Ban them, they should instead simply offer them a refund as single-player is clearly not what these people paid for. They are, in fact, the most harmed individuals in this as the "slaves" never lost the ability to actually play the game.
Click to expand...
Nope - actually the slavers won. They got the attention all griefers crave from 'big daddy fdev'.

I'm sure they're laughing it up watching all the ill-informed drama unfold as they level up their new CMDRs :ROFLMAO:
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom