I think that's what the recruits to the slave carriers said ....
I think that's what the recruits to the slave carriers said ....
Eh...I'm out, other people explained it enough times.
Today games and shadow bans for stuff OUTSIDE (yes, discords created by random players aren't official channels, this topic since long time is about theorethically bans for breaking law outside game) official channels of company product, tomorrow other, more important services.
The slavers themselves have stated that they were banned for actions in game. As per my original post - they were “deceiving and exploiting” new players.
Sometimes you need to make an example I guess but I heard the same thing about behaviour offline. Seems to me that could have been a factor in the level of sanction. If you were 'exploiting' players (hard labour slavery is illegal in ED lore) but giving them a fair chance to get off the carrier and communicating with players having a problem in the game, you might get a warning for the slavery, carrier impounded but nothing further. Revelling in the exploitation you achieved would be an aggravating factor though and obviously can lead to a more serious punishment. Premeditation - and a lack of remorse - does make a difference in murder versus manslaughter cases for example.
honestly the fact that the guy went on-record to a journalist and said that not only did he intend to keep doing it but find way to do it even harder says it allPremeditation - and a lack of remorse - does make a difference in murder versus manslaughter cases for example.
We can go back and forth for the next two pages on what factors were taken into consideration when Frontier banned them but really we'll never know because Frontier isn't likely to tell the Mining carrier employers or us what the decision process was.
True .. but as a general rule .. dealing with any officer of the law, a level of contrition will usually get you further than a two finger salute. Possibly the difference between an 'on your way' or an 'accompany me to the station' even.
So FD would have to call the police to legally ban someone from their game? That doesn't sound correct to me.
Yes well it appears they're beyond that now and what's done is done.
No, I think it's okay for fdev to ban a frontier account if the user of that account commits something ingame that's against the EULA/ToS of their product. What they are doing outside of the game is none of fdev's business though. It's simply outside of their "jurisdiction", figuratively speaking.
should slavery be 'allowed' by the game?
It is their right. The same as a pub/hotel/restaurant/shop could refuse to serve me for wearing an offensive T-shirt.
Welcome to the Frontier forums.I only replied to the thread because there were quite a lot of people posting here who seemed to be perfectly okay with the concept of such witch hunts, and that's simply not right.
On the Morality Spectrum where is fascism, cannibalism and slavery these days? If I wrote a Polygon article saying I eat fascist pigs for breakfast in EDs BGS (quite literally) where do I stand? Should I hide the Kumo Burger wrappers? And its still page 62- I want mah PowehPleh wish!
I'm thinking you just summed up the political ambitions of most world leaders.When slaves don't know they are slaves, or can be convinced that the alternative is worse, there isn't much that can be done, regardless.
I love vegans, mainly because they are corn fed which is important for reasons