Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
- Proof (if it was still necessary to find proofs) their development style is Naive approach
- LoL, but apart from that ships are done!
- Awesome!
- Isn't this an at least 4yo bug?
- Where is CIG's QA?
- Over-zealous anti-griefing system or griefing AI?
- SC in a nutshell
- New feature in a nutshell
- Faint astonishment tie-0
- Faint astonishment tier-1
- Why is this bound to low FPS?
- You differentiate yourself from the competition as you can...
- Even static and without IA NPCs are broken
- Ship happens
- But Server Meshing should help eventually
Yes, it's still early alpha, not a properly developed alpha, where all the 'features' you mentioned will be includedNot a streamer of course...but it also has my vote. I played last night with a couple of mates who are all regular Star Citizen players along with me...we had several hours of fumbling about trying to work out what we were doing before we realised we hadn't had any crashes or server disconnects, only one period of desync where we warped about for a few seconds before it righted itself, one instance of a mission pickup not registering and failing to complete between all of us and getting into a game together had been seamless... chalk and cheese to Star Citizen in the main...especially considering EDO is still early alpha
Bahwahahahaaa
That's some hardcore apologetics there. And worst of all, its completely unnecessary. Its perfectly fine to either a) agree and say you wish CIG had gone for realistic sized planets OR b) say you're fine with smaller planets even if they are not full scale.
Coming out with semantic horse manure like that though? That's just sad.
You don't need to defend CIG's honour you know.
What? There has been ship to station docking for years.
Sorry, is this what all the hype about physicalized components was?
Hatches opening and closing revealing what's behind them?
BREAKING NEWS! STOP THE PRESS! NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE!
No, it's not misleading, you can access the err 'offering' for $45. If people choose to do otherwise, that's their choice.
I only paid $35 as a really early backer, but I've never felt tempted to download and test it. In theory, I could probably claim a refund
The faithful should give this a watch.
I'll just copy my post from the reddit thread.
None of this sound familiar to you, O' faithful backers of Store Citizen?
I'll just copy my post from the reddit thread.
None of this sound familiar to you, O' faithful backers of Store Citizen?
No, it's not misleading, you can access the err 'offering' for $45. If people choose to do otherwise, that's their choice.
I only paid $35 as a really early backer, but I've never felt tempted to download and test it. In theory, I could probably claim a refund
If you never accepted the new TOS yes.
I think my point is valid. If everyone only funded the minimum, CIG would never have delivered on the game as advertised back in 2012, let along the monster it became later.
Likewise, if people stopped buying ships right now, only new people buying in with starter packs, CIG would have trouble getting a release out before they ran out of money.
It's a valid point, but it's irrelevant to what Little Ant said. You can spend just $45. Then you can pretty much rely on others being so far in they just can't let it falter or collapse.
I thank them, because I'm not putting in another brass cent.
Let's see...Joking aside now...the 3.13.0 patch has now been dumped on to wave 1 PTU. A whole 11Gb of bugs all in one patch
Patch notes ...read it and weep
In other terms, "it's totally broken and cannot move". Whoever owns these ships only will have a lot of "fun".
Translation: it's totally broken (means you have to land outside somewhere and go on foot inside the trade area, fortunately for CiG it's possible at NB, if this bug happened at Lorville or A18 it would be a complete show stopper)
It's an old bug, been there for years. Wont be fixed for this version either.
Ran into this. It's just after the spawn point. Means you cannot go anywhere since you need to ride that elevator to get out. Only way out is an account reset.
That one is almost funny. Unless you happen to own just that ship.
That's the one that blows up if you go QT. Fun times.
So not only that's the core functionality of that patch here, but it's also completely broken, and in combo with the also broken elevators and ramps. GG CiG.
That's also part of the core of this patch, and yeah, it's broken. GG again
Nothing is really exciting for this patch... Zero core tech improvement, again. Where's the Server Meshing ?
Last edited:
but planets doesn't revolve around the sun and the sun doesn't even exist. Stations are stationary even if they are too close to the planet to have synchronous orbit and so on...
Last edited:
I'm completly fine with the size of planets of SC. I even don't understand why the 1/6 ratio is such a deal for some players.
Not directly, no. Its more of an aside. You can.. but if others don't....
What i'm saying is, you should buy an Idris.
You land on station, you don't dock. This patch should add ship to small station docking for all big ships.
It's another step toward it, those animation are needed. We might be able to get out by hand those components and put in new ones by hand too (for repairing or replacing by better ones).
The docking to station add the expandable grid which is a big improvment of the grid tech.
Because CIG sold backers on realism/simulation (i put both just to cover both bases). And remember, fidelity! You know, that word that backers and CIG like to use oh so much?
Definition of fidelity
1a : the quality or state of being faithful his fidelity to his wife
b : accuracy in details : exactness The movie's director insisted on total fidelity to the book.
Accuracy in detail.....
There again, CIG seem to have trouble with the meaning of words.
Always gives me a smile when CIG call whales that.
Erm... so, just docking. Like in Elite or NMS. Got it.
Oh, another step towards. Coming soon... or not. Maybe you will get to do something with those components. Maybe not. Like how in ED Odyssey you can replace power cores in stations. Got it.
Fidelity to what ?
I still don't understand the fidelity argument when we talk about imaginary planets...
Stanton can be bigger than Jupiter or smaller than Mercury. Knowing that the scale used in SC is 1/6 doesn't change the fact this planet can be any size bigger than a dwarf planet as explained here.
I know a lot of backer use the term fidelity but I struggle to find relevant reference where CIG talked about fidelity as a "must follow" vision. I find some talks about specific topics but I can't find the general claim about CGI's fidelity in every aspect of the game as you reference it...
There is docking in those games ? I only landed...
For what I know, the docking we talk about is physically connecting two structures to be able to walk from one to another without going outside.