Oh, so THAT'S the power of suggestion. "all it takes..."Easy-peasy... You are awake and active during the hours I can play - so all it takes is the suggestion here
Only if those players wished to fly / walk / die alongside another player or two...Oh, so THAT'S the power of suggestion. "all it takes..."
If only that were true; then Elite Dangerous would be the game that "everybody" wants it to be.
The only freedom we ever really have is the freedom to choose our own behavior/mind set. Its just that sometimes the number of choices are limited, and each have some undesirable side-effect making it seem like we have no choices. But we always do, unless we're dead or otherwise incapacitated.
Well, there is the next paradox - choices vs freedom.
Then, as what comes to mind is frequently interacting with my family, taking them stories I have found, playing games, staying in your off-roader would have, by definition, restricted my freedoms too, because the opportunities to do these things would be lost. Honestly, if you define freedom so broadly you can fit anything into the increasingly large rubber bag marked "restricts my freedom", and I think you reach what a mathematician would call the trivial solution.
Going by your definition here my freedoms are both restricted by looking before crossing the road (because for some reason safety has to be excluded from freedom) and by being hit by a truck, because it will leave me unable to pursue other things that come to mind. Words are tools, and abstract words tend toward semantic drift depended on the cultural context of the speaker, but I this version of freedom seems too semantically light to have much use.
Do yourself a favour and do something else then?
Of course, because freedom doesn't exist.
Try blue, mission POIs.
hm baby oil is by default virgin oil - regardless if you cold or hot press those babies.If tin whistles are made of tin, what do they make foghorns out of?
(and don't even get me started on the vegetable oil / baby oil debate!
I did it before without mission and it worked. But sure, I will try.
Do something other than tell the truth? No thanks.
I wanted to make a smart and dark remark here, falsifying this assumption.
our language is just weird at times - that is all I wanted to show with it.
Was he referring to this thread?
Or we can use the word differently and retain its ability to mean something. To avoid being Socratic (i.e., to avoid acting like nit-picking other people's positions is a whole, legitimate school of thought) I think a good definition accepts that all freedom is relative, and that in increase in freedom means an increase in opportunities to choose something that will enrich and make better your experience of life. If a multitude of choices were all unpleasant it certainly wouldn't seem like a good candidate for a free situation. This means that incarceration is less free than (ho ho) freedom, that laws can exist to balance, rather than just to curtail freedoms, and that there is space to discuss autocracy and tyranny sensibly as being generally less free than, say, total democracy, as well as the denial of opportunity through poverty being a meaningful denial of freedom.
Thank's but I have never read a single philosophical book or in my life and I purposely restrain myself from this.
