General / Off-Topic Hunting season starts on Oct 1

  • Thread starter Deleted member 115407
  • Start date
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Hey, feel free! I'd love to see what you have!

On Oct 1 I'm taking my 22LR out to hunt squirrel. Then later in the season I'll be taking this beauty out to hunt deer and feral hogs (the latter of which are invasive and in dire need of population control here in Texas).

Will you be hunting at all this year, Chaparral?
Only paper targets with my Colt King Cobra and Sig 226. Lots of pellet rifle rabbit and squirrel shooting to keep them away from our chickens and garden. My next purchase will be a hunting rifle for mule deer. Unfortunately, it is a "moving target" on what the specs for rifles are permitted in our crazy state.I'm looking hard at the Mossberg Patriot Synthetic.
 
What are brownfields?


I live in an area of western NY where there has been a lot of industrial pollution. Most of it has been cleaned up at this point, but there are still Superfund sites that haven't been completely remediated and plenty of questionable Brownfields. Some of the tributaries of the Niagara river near me are quite contaminated; immediately local fish shouldn't be eaten, and what game exists is questionable enough that I'm not going to eat it even if risks are ostensibly low.

Between places like the Tonawanda Coke Plant, Love Canal, (both within walking distance) and the pipes in this 70 year old house, I'm sure I get plenty enough lead and mercury already.
 

Deleted member 115407

D

I live in an area of western NY where there has been a lot of industrial pollution. Most of it has been cleaned up at this point, but there are still Superfund sites that haven't been completely remediated and plenty of questionable Brownfields. Some of the tributaries of the Niagara river near me are quite contaminated; immediately local fish shouldn't be eaten, and what game exists is questionable enough that I'm not going to eat it even if risks are ostensibly low.

Between places like the Tonawanda Coke Plant, Love Canal, (both within walking distance) and the pipes in this 70 year old house, I'm sure I get plenty enough lead and mercury already.
I recall Mad Magazine made a lot of jokes about Love Canal when I was a kid.
 

Deleted member 115407

D
Only paper targets with my Colt King Cobra and Sig 226. Lots of pellet rifle rabbit and squirrel shooting to keep them away from our chickens and garden. My next purchase will be a hunting rifle for mule deer. Unfortunately, it is a "moving target" on what the specs for rifles are permitted in our crazy state.I'm looking hard at the Mossberg Patriot Synthetic.
Dude, I almost bought a King Cobra a couple weeks back, but instead I bought the Chiappa 30DS that can be seen in my original photo.

Unfortauntely I haven't been able to shoot it yet because all I can find in .357 are self defense and hunting loads.

Zeroed my 10/22 at 50m today, and bought an over-under 410 on the way home. Ready for squirrels on October 1st :)
 

Deleted member 115407

D
It is perfectly ok if you "need" the food to survive. Anything beyond that is killing for fun. The openly displayed gun fetishism does not really allow for any other conclusion. I'm not going into a moral discussion here, but you should at least admit that to yourself.
Lots of people "need" bacon and chicken thighs, but virtually nobody complains about that.
 

Deleted member 115407

D
The openly displayed gun fetishism does not really allow for any other conclusion.
I know a lot of people don't understand it.

From hunting rifles, to battle rifles, to plinkers and hand-cannons, guns are some really beautifully manufactured tools. And beautiful manufacturing costs money. And people should be proud of the quality tools that they have acquired with the money that they have earned from their hard work.

The alternative to my .308 is me trapping an animal and then stabbing it repeatedly with a sharp stick, I guess. That sounds like an absolutely horrid fate. I am proud to own that quality rifle and will be proud to humanely dispatch an animal or two with it this season. It's a lot better than a cow having its head chainsawed off at the local meat packing plant.
 
It’s an interesting sport where the odds are all stacked on one side.
I think quite many who are following this thread would find it surprising how stacked the odds often are, on the wildlife's side. :)
At least when I go alone (or with a friend or two) without dogs (I don't have any dogs that would be helpful to me while hunting :D) tryig to harvest some 'organic chicken'. ;)

Organised big (or small) game 'hunt' in big groups and with a bunch of dogs is something else. I'd call that "sporting" instead of hunting, even if the resulting monetary and/or nutritional value of success may be higher for the participants. Just not my cup of tea. 🤷‍♂️
 
It is perfectly ok if you "need" the food to survive. Anything beyond that is killing for fun. The openly displayed gun fetishism does not really allow for any other conclusion. I'm not going into a moral discussion here, but you should at least admit that to yourself.
It is not about the killing. Providing for oneself is satisfying. Developing the skills to be independent and self-reliant are satisfying.

Denigrating people wanting to develop survival skills is the squealing whine of a person saying "depend on mommy, just like me".

Developing and maintaining the skills to care for yourself ensures the survival of your offspring. There is a very thin veil of societal functioning and not functioning. When covid broke out in my city, the grocery stores were wiped out in 72 hours. I was very grateful for my gardens and chickens, and prickly pear and yucca stands. I applaud any person's efforts to develop and maintain survival skills.

Good on you Vin, and good hunting.
 
Anything beyond that is killing for fun.

I don't really agree. The goal can be something less than an absolute necessity and still not be engaged in for the purpose of entertainment. Indeed, it may be outright distasteful, just less so than the alternatives.

Personally, I'm not a big fan of hunting...it's something I find both tedious and messy (I don't like handling even precut meat from the grocer, though I can dress a carcass, if I must), but if circumstances made it the most practical way for me to stay comfortably fed, I would not hesitate to hunt. It's really no different than, say, doing laundry. I don't like doing laundry and I sure won't die if I refuse to do laundry. I still strongly prefer wearing clean clothes, so I wash mine, regularly.

That said, I usually do try to make anything I do as enjoyable as possible. Most every act I take can be distilled into a cost/benefit assessment and turning an otherwise distasteful act into a game or sport might make that assessment more favorable.

With "need" I mean the hard version. Like starving without it. What you call "need" sounds to me on the same level when people "need" their potato chips.
I might be wrong, but then tell my how many people do you personally know who literally starved without their bacon or chicken thighs - if there are any at all.

Virtually no one with Vin's hardware is destitute enough to starve without hunting, but there are people who are, even in States.

Subsistence hunting is a thing. It's most common among indigenous groups, but there are quite a few other rural poor who would actually starve without the ability to hunt, or at the very least be forced into crime, often with the goal of being incarcerated, which is the only form of social welfare that may realistically be available to them.

Regardless, I try not to judge anyone for liking what they like, only for the harm they actually cause...tempered by any extenuating circumstances.

the ordinary American

By and large the idea of the 'ordinary American' can only be an over generalization, but fewer than one-in-three Americans owns a firearm and only about one-in-twenty hunt with any regularity.

prejudice or fact?

Both. One rarely learns or reinforces prejudices without examples that support them--and a prejudiced assumption that turns out to be correct doesn't make it any less prejudicial. It is perfectly possible to arrive at a sound conclusion via very unsound means.
 

Deleted member 115407

D
Virtually no one with Vin's hardware is destitute enough to starve without hunting,
Gave me a chuckle :)

I'm kitting out my AK for hog hunting. Will share a photo when it's ready in a week or so.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Deleted member 115407

D
Wonder where you got your sources from. My first random google search brought this to me:

This is from 2018 and there were 120.5 guns per 100 people. These numbers have hardly shrunk since then.
It's estimated that the number of owners is somewhere in the 30-40% range.

It is impossible to know for certain, because there is little to no registration upon first purchase, and private sales thereafter are virtually unregulated.
 
Wonder where you got your sources from.


This is from 2018 and there were 120.5 guns per 100 people. These numbers have hardly shrunk since then.

Most Americans don't own firearms, but many firearm owners own more than one, some own a lot more than one.

Vin has mentioned owning at least three. Most of my in-laws own at least one, including my minor siblings in-law. I know some people who own dozens. However, I and most of the people I know, own none.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 115407

D
Vin has mentioned owning at least three.
I'm pretty close to the 3% mentioned in that article. I've owned a couple more that I either gifted or sold to others.
Most everyone else I know owns either one or two, or none at all (the majority).

What can I say, I like the pew.
 

Deleted member 115407

D
Thumbs up for the rifle.
Myself I don't like hunting at all, but I am ok with people doing it as long as they know what they are doing, and follow the laws.
Thanks much. Yeah, I'm really excited to zero her this weekend.
I already have the 22 zeroed for when squirrel season starts on the 1st.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom