You missed the argument. I said you cannot compare it, like you implicitly did, not that one should compare it.
Probably because they are well-programmed to allow for walking around to feel natural, just like the whole spacesuit. (Like, constantly adjusting the magnetic intensity based on the individual movements.)
Because it wouldn't, see above. Your assumption that it would be easier to float around makes no sense. Humans have bodies meant to be agile in gravitational environments, not in the absence of it.
What argument did I miss? You brought up the IS amnd made that connection.
So just magic then.Supporting lazy programming. That is why most science fiction have artifical gravity, like Star Treks gravity plates. That offers a lore explanation to this situation, that for the most part is consistent. And Elite lore have specifically said that we do not have artificial gravity, so that is why the big space stations rotate.
Humans are lazy, so of course they are going to use easiest mode of transportation, and floating around in Zero gravity is much more efficient to move about, than walking. and just looking at how they move around in Zero Gravity on ISS, MIR, Space Shuttle, etc, is quite telling about how very little effort it is to move around while floating. So why design a space outpost that has Zero Gravity to be like we had Gravity makes no sense, when the more effient use of the spacer would be to treat every surface as a wall, to put stuff on, instead having the traditional floor, walls and ceilling. We can't even jump in the outposts, so we have to walk on stairs... And also, if your mag boots stops working, how do move around in the outposts?
so many holes in the logic, and when we have to start to use "magic" solutions to this, then we know how much thoughts was put on these "solutions"