Regionalised in captivity. In Europe/the EAZA there are 139 facilities holding the Eurasian otter, compared to 271 facilties in the same region holding the Asian small-clawed otter. Even in its native land the Eurasian otter isn't especially common in zoos, with most of those 139 facilities being smaller wildpark-like places.I understand that the Asian small clawed is more common in zoos all over the world, but I wouldn't call the Eurasian otter "very regionalised" when it's the otter that has the largest distribution area and ranges from North Africa to Skandinavia and even overlaps with the small Asian one, so it has the grassland, temperate, tropical, taiga and tundra biomes.
In any case, I prefer to have a red deer over the otter.
Niche was meant for the giant otter - regionalised for the Eurasian otter. In effect both are the same, not representative of captive otters as a whole, unlike the ASC which has a global presence and is probably the otter most laypersons think of when they think 'otter'.I wouldn't call the Eurasian otter niche, but I agree the ASCO is far far more common.
Anyway, I have no beef with the Eurasian otter on its own, it's just that it will doubtless make the ASC a lesser priority if it's included and I think Frontier should know better that the ASC is the specific otter most of us want, as opposed to just "any small river otter".