White Shading of B-Type Star stands for?

Difference.png


Above you see the same galaxy map area. On the left picture filter is set to show B-Type Stars. On the right picture filter is set to not show B-Type Stars. What does the white shading of a star indicate?
 
Believe they're just small dust clouds rather than planetary nebulae. They're more common than PNs but you don't really see anything in the systems themselves, unlike PNs. You can sometimes get a good view of them by visiting the closest system rather than the system itself.
 
I always thought that it was down to the brightness or luminosity of the star that caused the white bloom, but do not know for sure.
Seen plenty of brighter and bigger stars that do not exhibit the bloom. And have also seen a few (higher mass) herbig Ae/Be stars that show this phenomenon. I'm sure it's just a localized dust cloud.
 

Ozric

Volunteer Moderator
Seen plenty of brighter and bigger stars that do not exhibit the bloom. And have also seen a few (higher mass) herbig Ae/Be stars that show this phenomenon. I'm sure it's just a localized dust cloud.
I think I'd agree. It's not just B class stars that have them too, although it's often them or O, but I have seen quite a few TTS stars that have them.
 
I always thought that it was down to the brightness or luminosity of the star that caused the white bloom, but do not know for sure.

You sometimes see the same effect around T Tauri stars, and many of those are definitely not bright enough for that to account for it. On the other hand, both T Tauri and the really bright B and O class stars you see this effect with are very young in terms of the age of stars in general, so it might make sense there's still plenty of dust around from the accretion disk when the planets were formed, not enough to really obscure any stars when you are there, and maybe far enough out from the main star that you wouldn't notice it, but it could still be illuminated by the main star enough to for these halos to form.

In fact we have direct evidence that these halos exist, HD 95086 has one according to NASA;

Researchers studying what appears to be a beefed-up version of our solar system have discovered that it is encased in a halo of fine dust. The findings are based on infrared data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope and the European Space Agency's Herschel Space Observatory, in which NASA is a partner.

The dusty star system, called HD 95086, is located 295 light-years from Earth in the constellation Carina. It is thought to include two belts of dust, which lie within the newfound outer dust halo. One of these belts is warm and closer to its star, as is the case with our solar system's asteroid belt, while the second belt is cooler and farther out, similar to our own Kuiper belt of icy comets.

I don't know whether it has one in game, but halos not thick enough to form nebula's are probably reasonably common in the galaxy.
 
These small fuzzy patches around certain bright/young stars are tiny little un-named nebulae. You cannot see them anywhere else, except on the galaxy map; you can't see them in the actual system, and you can't see them from neighbouring systems.

They appear to exist purely and simply to add a visual effect to the galaxy map, to make it look "more galaxy-like", especially when viewed from a distance. Unlike regular nebulae, these tiny nebulae are still visible on the galaxy map at maximum zoom-out, looking like bright stars.

Because you can see them from so far away, these systems tend to act like beacons for explorers. Except perhaps for the core regions, there won't be a single one of these that hasn't been explored yet. All the ones I've visited have already been explored, even though all the surrounding systems were unexplored.
 
Good question, OP. I'd often looked at that phenomenon and wondered why some stars (mostly and Os in my experience) had them. And thanks for the answers. This kind of thread is what makes ED great - people stopping to think, asking the questions that the rest of us don't, and getting answers.
 
These small fuzzy patches around certain bright/young stars are tiny little un-named nebulae. You cannot see them anywhere else, except on the galaxy map; you can't see them in the actual system, and you can't see them from neighbouring systems.

I'm sure you can see them (sometimes?) from close, neighbouring systems. Sure, they don't stick out like PNs or anything - but I'm sure it's visible. I swear I took screenshots of one I saw some time back, but obviously can't find it now. Maybe I need to go and re-check...
 
I'm sure you can see them (sometimes?) from close, neighbouring systems. Sure, they don't stick out like PNs or anything - but I'm sure it's visible. I swear I took screenshots of one I saw some time back, but obviously can't find it now. Maybe I need to go and re-check...

I think I recall that as well, but really I stopped hunting them after finding the first hundred or so were discovered long ago, plenty of other stuff to do out there.
 
I always thought that this is just a bug, so that the halos of these stars are just baked into the overall galaxy texture layers in error :D
 
Back
Top Bottom