They are also judged by dreams released (billions system galaxy or Armstrong moment). When something potential becomes real, judging on other announced potential things is no longer out of context.
Signed, sealed, delivered...
They are also judged by dreams released (billions system galaxy or Armstrong moment). When something potential becomes real, judging on other announced potential things is no longer out of context.
None really. Actually the only hint of progress (an attempt at VTOL mode, which did require a very little amount of skill) was immediately backtracked after all the people who cant actually pilot started screaming loudly. Which is a shame really, as this game is supposed to be "multicrew" with a lot of people in other seats. For reference that VTOL mode attempt was surprisingly realistic compared to everything else in the FM, with the ship being suspended on top of its vertical thrust pretty much like actual VTOL aircraft, and pitch/roll would induce lateral movement. It was also victim of the really abysmal physics engine that would glitch out and send the ship in random directions at times. With that fixed, this would have justified the existence of a VTOL mode on some ship models, which is currently only for decoration or roleplay.Ahhh, the days of "the Flight model is so good, it's simply percieved as bad."
How much progress has been made since then I wonder?
Healthy!The whole rather painful crowd funding experience has taught me to only judge on what's been done, potential has no place in the equation.
None really. Actually the only hint of progress (an attempt at VTOL mode, which did require a very little amount of skill) was immediately backtracked after all the people who cant actually pilot started screaming loudly. Which is a shame really, as this game is supposed to be "multicrew" with a lot of people in other seats. For reference that VTOL mode attempt was surprisingly realistic compared to everything else in the FM, with the ship being suspended on top of its vertical thrust pretty much like actual VTOL aircraft, and pitch/roll would induce lateral movement. It was also victim of the really abysmal physics engine that would glitch out and send the ship in random directions at times. With that fixed, this would have justified the existence of a VTOL mode on some ship models, which is currently only for decoration or roleplay.
They got back to the basic "arcade flight model" that is still the same after these years. Also zero progress was made for the atmo FM, for instance the ship shape (including wings and tails) have no impact, or mass distribution... It's a shame really as they have the unique opportunity to differentiate atmo capable ships and give them a bit more personality.
It doesn't matter in the end. it#s an abusive system where its denizens are lied to frequently while soaking up their cash. If you want to call it marxist - it's just a label like "unfettered, unregulated corpocapitalism".Financial regulations aren't socialism or communism, they are laws that are (supposed to, anyway) prevent people and companies manipulating potential investors and consumers (by preventing pump n dumps or various other schemes). Mostly to continue to provide stability and trust in the financial systems that are in place.
And hey, this thread has talked about a lot of weird things, especially in regards to crypto, NFTs and other digital assets.
I didn't bring up the metaverse stuff in the first place, I just made an offhand comment (that again, was meant more as a joke, unless you believe I really lust for nuclear death).
Although I guess Star Citizen is Marxist, since it's getting tens of millions in tax credits.
I dodged nothing. You just "forget" each delivered promises as soon as they are delivered by CIG, just focusing on the promises not delivered yet. You try to convince us that after 10 years, the alpha is just empty, that's not the case.It is, as CiG have demonstrated in the last 10 years they do not deliver on their promises. We already played this little game and you dodged the question, but really, there is a long list of "announced potential things" that still are vaporware, and will never exist in any form remotely close to what was promised.
I believe this refers to the opening paragraph in the report. Just a sort of disclaimer. It does not list exhaustively what has been left out though. It simply states the report is both incomplete and irregular in its format. Things like a missing basic balance sheet or details about revenue recognition (which could be useful, perhaps, in terms of SQ42 for example or to have a peek at what other revenues where CIG considers it has delivered a product on and can declare profits about) etc.
The disclaimer also patronizes a bit the community by telling us we are not worthy and able to read a standard more detailed report. Somehow I highly doubt that magnanimous argument be the actual reason.
Of course, the big difference is that Star Citizen affects nobody who doesn't want to get involved. If CIG is happy doing what they are doing, and people enjoy it for whatever reason; good for them and not my problem.They really are the Trump of the gaming industry.
In other words: Scamming and frauds are perfectly fine.Of course, the big difference is that Star Citizen affects nobody who doesn't want to get involved. If CIG is happy doing what they are doing, and people enjoy it for whatever reason; good for them and not my problem.![]()
Of course, the big difference is that Star Citizen affects nobody who doesn't want to get involved. If CIG is happy doing what they are doing, and people enjoy it for whatever reason; good for them and not my problem.![]()
I often wonder if those who cry “socialism” or “communism” at the mere hint of regulation have ever actually read Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations. I have, and I’m editing this post to not say anything further, no matter how tempted I am to do so.Financial regulations aren't socialism or communism, they are laws that are (supposed to, anyway) prevent people and companies manipulating potential investors and consumers (by preventing pump n dumps or various other schemes). Mostly to continue to provide stability and trust in the financial systems that are in place.
Do not mix two different actions with two different reasons.Oh for sure, and that is, I think, what is most amazing to me. CIG does crappy things, people complain, and then throw even more money at them. Completely counterintuitive, but damn, it sure works. From a pure business sense, hats off to CIG!
In other words: Scamming and frauds are perfectly fine.
This kind of proves my point though...over 400,000,000 dollars over a decade, with no change or end in sight, no indication of the money flow slowing down...ANY other company doing things the way CIG has done would be bankrupt long ago...yet for them and their supporters, it just...works.Do not mix two different actions with two different reasons.
Some people complain because they don't like some things done by CIG.
The majority throw money at CIG because, despite those bad things, all the rest appeal to them and they like what they see in the alpha.