Well who would have believed at 2014 something like 400 million and still not ready at all?Derek Smart is an overly optimistic SC backer. He insisted the game could not be made for less than 150M and not before 2018.
Investors being paid dividends, kinda how investing works but oh well...This is also deeply suspect. Whenever i read about "intangible assets", it makes me think of Narcos....
This is also deeply suspect. Whenever i read about "intangible assets", it makes me think of Narcos....
Investors paid for an alpha, "intangible assets" and buying stakes in a partner of his own company, all with backer cash?Investors being paid dividends, kinda how investing works but oh well...
Yeah, "investors" do get paid dividends. If you generate profit. Btw. are "pledges" now "sales"? Instead of obligations to deliver?Investors being paid dividends, kinda how investing works but oh well...
Just giving facts you can read by yourself don't make me priceless.Ant, you're priceless......so, after a decade what is the age status of the SC Alpha pray tell?.......early?........pre-pubescent?........pipeline dependent?
So it is still basically a tech demo? After 400 million and whatever years? But at same time released game? Sounds to me that it is in some kind quantum superposition, depending on stance of observer.Just giving facts you can read by yourself don't make me priceless.
SC is not yet at the status of the Valheim's alpha.
The alpha need at least all core mechanisms in game. SC still lacking some important ones (mainly SM), it's not yet near the beta phase.
Valheim having all of them in game, the game is near the beta status.
You want to call SC a beta in its current state ?
Just giving facts you can read by yourself don't make me priceless.
SC is not yet at the status of the Valheim's alpha.
The alpha need at least all core mechanisms in game. SC still lacking some important ones (mainly SM), it's not yet near the beta phase.
Valheim having all of them in game, the game is near the beta status.
You want to call SC a beta in its current state ?
Not really. There are several possible sources of return for investors, dividends being just one of them. The thing with dividends is that they can be paid out only in particular circumstances. There was someone here with proper knowledge, investigating it deeper. They said in case of CIG the payment of dividends could be legally justified only due to income from subs. Without those, there would be no legal basis for these payments, at least not from UK companies.Investors being paid dividends, kinda how investing works but oh well...
They have always been sales. This is how they account for them in the UK.Yeah, "investors" do get paid dividends. If you generate profit. Btw. are "pledges" now "sales"? Instead of obligations to deliver?
So basically they could just call it quits and show middlefinger to suck...erm "backers"?`And laugh whole way to bank. No obligations at all.They have always been sales. This is how they account for them in the UK.
Buy an Odyssey.
Yeah, "investors" do get paid dividends. If you generate profit. Btw. are "pledges" now "sales"? Instead of obligations to deliver?
CIG consider the money gained from game, ship, UEC, cosmetics, subscriptions, etc as revenue from product sales (not pledges). Chris' December 2020 chairman letter has him stating revenue (and paying accounts) many times; pledges none.Not really. There are several possible sources of return for investors, dividends being just one of them. The thing with dividends is that they can be paid out only in particular circumstances. There was someone here with proper knowlesge, investigating it deeper. They said in case of CIG the payment of dividends could be legally justified only due to income from subs. Without those, there would be no legal basis for these payments, at least not from UK companies.
![]()
Running a limited company: your responsibilities
Running a limited company - including directors' responsibilities, company annual returns, reporting company changes and how to take money out of a limited companywww.gov.uk
"Your company must not pay out more in dividends than its available profits from current and previous financial years."
Not really. There are several possible sources of return for investors, dividends being just one of them. The thing with dividends is that they can be paid out only in particular circumstances. There was someone here with proper knowlesge, investigating it deeper. They said in case of CIG the payment of dividends could be legally justified only due to income from subs. Without those, there would be no legal basis for these payments, at least not from UK companies.
I mean even 110 systems at this stage seems like the project management equivalent to Moses parting the Red Sea.
That is certainly how it seems CIG is positioning itself to best defend any eventual legal or regulatory issues. Selling the product as "playable now", applying VAT, declaring profits and paying dividends, CIG customer support explicitly stating the game was already released as Early Access back in 2016, arguing refund lawsuit defenses based around the idea the product is already released etc.So basically they could just call it quits and show middlefinger to suck...erm "backers"?`And laugh whole way to bank. No obligations at all.
Yes.Investors paid for an alpha, "intangible assets" and buying stakes in a partner of his own company, all with backer cash?
OK