Depends heavily on whether the mod manual arrives or not…
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
Depends heavily on whether the mod manual arrives or not…
What’s a game anyways
No. Seriously, tell me about a game that 100% met the Fanbases' dreams.
Well this game will not even meet dreams of developers. Or at least their promises.
It is pretty funny to read threads in Spectrum what ever the title, "it will be this way in future"....
But you are talking around my question. Can you tell me about a game that has met the Fanbases' dreams?
Since really, it's a stupid headline to write since it's not happened with any game, lol.
Not even 10 posts are we've arrived at "X didn't do it, so CIG gets a pass."Fixed that for you. Also, that doesn't happen very often either!
Source: https://youtu.be/EM0Gcl7iUM8?t=180
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
Most often than not no, it does not. But not every game has been funded with backer money to the tune of 450+ millions over 10+ years before it is even known if it does in fact live up or not.
SC is very different, for the worst, than most every other game including that key and core regard.
Last edited:
Finally! An answer at last. In conclusion: It's a stupid headline
Basically problem for SC is that management/devs have sold whole pack of really "not going to happen" dreams to gullible people. And allready got their money.Fixed that for you
Source: https://youtu.be/EM0Gcl7iUM8?t=180
Last edited:
I think we all agree that it's a factual headline too
Remember those NPCs not distinguishable from real players stuff for example. Good luck with THAT. And it is only single example.
Probably going to be, but it's still stupidI think we all agree that it's a factual headline too
Both are fully capable of t-posing and clipping through objects, so... mission accomplished!
My little pleasure
"There are a lot of things that certainly sound bad to me, like the part where the game allows players to heal people to death in areas that are supposed to be safe from PvP, but maybe that sounds fun to you."
Because ALPHAAAA !
How very professional to talk about a short live bug already fixed in the current version of SC as if it were a feature of the current game. Someone wanted here journalists to do reviews of SC even though it is in alpha. Well you have one here who, despite only talking about one (and only one in the whole article) mechanism of SC, has absolutely no idea how it works in the current version of SC. As if he hasn't tested the actual alpha... ho wait...
That's why real journalists don't do alpha reviews, because they are useless and obsolete by the next patch.
Last edited:
Well is it released game or alpha? Try to refund and you find it is a released game. Try to review and its is ALPHA....
Dunno, I did not think quantum effects manifest in macroscopic scale, but seems to me that SC is in quantum superposition. It can be both ALPHA and released game at same time.
You do know what an editorial is, correct?
Would you say that gamestar.de is more objective in their reporting on Star Citizen?
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
Not really, if anything the headline and article text were quite soft. Not living up to fan dreams is not a binary yes/no discussion where you can lumpsum all games equally. It has grades.
SC´s case is much worst than most every other game. To be clearer the article could have stressed how how much more poor than most any other games SC will be when compared to its dream, but the fact the article was made for SC at all, and not for other games, should have given you a hint.