For what reason?
So that when a wing pf players attack another wing of players the leading attacker will suddenly find themself alone facing an enemy wing, what else?
Translation ?
The first sentence sounds like this: as long as you are not in the wing.
It's very simple. And there is no contradiction.
It's a convention just like:
Blacklist,
Instant player relocation in multi-crev
etc.
This is done to partially correct the imbalance in the open game.
No one needs to do anything and everyone will only be better off from this.
So far I can't find a single contradiction in this proposal.
It seems that way.
If I'm a loner in an open game, then when I'm intercepted I will always fight only the one who intercepted me.
If I'm a member of a wing and we want to intercept a loner, only one member of the tier who intercepted him will fight him.
Why?
You don't need to intercept someone for a treaty battle, they will all just fly into one place.
Balancing healthpools better, having an actually functional security system and being more didactic about how to escape would all be significantly better solutions than this.
Apart from anything, most seal clubbers work alone anyway so it wouldn't make any difference to them, it'd just ruin organic or faction-centric PvP for everyone that enjoys it.
Apart from anything, most seal clubbers work alone anyway so it wouldn't make any difference to them, it'd just ruin organic or faction-centric PvP for everyone that enjoys it.
Wolf Pack is a valid tactic, and definitely should not be removed.
If the real complaint is related to behavior in, e.g., Shinrarta Dezhra, then the correct solution would be to give the C&P system some real teeth in High Security systems.
But if lone traders want to navigate through anarchy and low security system, they should be absolutely fair game to packs of pirates, thugs and murders.
If the real complaint is related to behavior in, e.g., Shinrarta Dezhra, then the correct solution would be to give the C&P system some real teeth in High Security systems.
But if lone traders want to navigate through anarchy and low security system, they should be absolutely fair game to packs of pirates, thugs and murders.
Also, as usual in this kind of suggestion, the debate has been unhelpfully and preemptively divided into a simplistic 'ganker vs victim' divide which doesn't actually match the diverse and nuanced player profiles in open play. A lot of people enjoy asymmetric fights regardless of which side they find themselves on.
As a criminal player I've often been interdicted by people looking to collect my bounty who really needed all the help they can get from their wingmates. This game has a huge power spectrum for individual ships and to cap it off a very high skill ceiling for individual players, so locking people into 1v1s would only serve to make the game more boring and less immersive, rather than functionally safer or fairer for the majority.
"There's no contradiction"... Many things look simple when you have limited experience in them.
As a criminal player I've often been interdicted by people looking to collect my bounty who really needed all the help they can get from their wingmates. This game has a huge power spectrum for individual ships and to cap it off a very high skill ceiling for individual players, so locking people into 1v1s would only serve to make the game more boring and less immersive, rather than functionally safer or fairer for the majority.
"There's no contradiction"... Many things look simple when you have limited experience in them.
It's just another suggestion, there have been many suggestions to increase security but they don't do it.
I don't know why.
Maybe this proposal will give impetus for at least some redesign of the existing open game.
I have no right to speak for others and to say: many people like ...
I also have no right to evaluate the experience of others, because in my opinion it is a discussion of a proposal and not a measurement of another person's experience.