I’ve got stock 4D shields on mine. Jumps 76 and change when full of fuel and will do a smidge over 82ly max
53.59ly from a Mandalay? Really?
- Thread starter CMDR Rusty Dog
- Start date
sounds great
Ooooo, Seamus Heaney poem!! Lovely name.Ho-leeeee sh-
Me likey.
A tiny bit of tuning to do on the modules not able to be brought over from my DBX, but currently using 9.99 MW of 10 MW fully-deployed. No switching vehicle hangar on and off!
If the idea of exploration is to explore, then the bigger the jump range you use, the more content you skip when jumping.
Couldn't of said it better myself. Here's my Mandalay I'm loving this thing so far. My Asp Explorer is going to be gathering dust for awhile lol
Coriolis EDCD Edition
A ship builder, outfitting and comparison tool for Elite Dangerous
s.orbis.zone
Explore using Economical route plotting.
For me, it comes down to the simple fact that a high jump range ship can always make shorter jumps, while a shorter range ship can't make longer jumps.
Also the higher your max jump range, the less fuel you consume on shorter jumps. Meaning you can explore more systems without a fuel star.
Exactly. And if you have a long jump range ship it’s much quicker to get back to civilisation when you’ve had enough and fancy a change of pace.
Not familiar with the poet; my fleet all has water- and sea-related names. Minnow (sidewinder), Ayukawa (cobra iii), Hammerhead (eagle), Lure of the Sea (dbx), Melusine (python), the Selkie's Sorrow (asp x), Rusalka (cutter), etc.
Looked around the cockpit in VR, and...oh hey that's neat, there's a pit in between the pilot and secondary seat!
I think that's the same in the Mamba.Not familiar with the poet; my fleet all has water- and sea-related names. Minnow (sidewinder), Ayukawa (cobra iii), Hammerhead (eagle), Lure of the Sea (dbx), Melusine (python), the Selkie's Sorrow (asp x), Rusalka (cutter), etc.
Looked around the cockpit in VR, and...oh hey that's neat, there's a pit in between the pilot and secondary seat!