PvP An Investigation Into Frontier's Actions on Combat Logging, Part 2

Arguendo

Volunteer Moderator
No all cheats/exploits are exactly the same from the perspective of a legit player
I do not disagree with that, never have. You on the other hand said that the "combatloggers" were the same players that also used the 5-1 exploit. I pointed out that they are not, nothing more nothing less.
 
To clarify what I'm speaking of when I'm talking about my experiences, here is one example:

szEUQeu.png


I, and others, encountered this CMDR (whose name has been redacted) in Open, doing the same sort of stuff with a ship he probably shouldn't have even had by that point, after the submission of this, and other reports of similar antics.

There are countless examples like this--clear cut disconnections, either repeated to the point it's obvious they are deliberate and/or where the cheater admits to cheating--where reports have been filed and nothing has come of it.
 

Arguendo

Volunteer Moderator
I, and others, encountered this CMDR (whose name has been redacted) in Open, doing the same sort of stuff with a ship he probably shouldn't have even had by that point, after the submission of this, and other reports of similar antics.
The shame of using such a commander name with that attitude. She would never combatlog I am sure!
(Hint; the cmdr name can be found by following information in your picture ;) )
 
To clarify what I'm speaking of when I'm talking about my experiences, here is one example:

I, and others, encountered this CMDR (whose name has been redacted) in Open, doing the same sort of stuff with a ship he probably shouldn't have even had by that point, after the submission of this, and other reports of similar antics.

There are countless examples like this--clear cut disconnections, either repeated to the point it's obvious they are deliberate and/or where the cheater admits to cheating--where reports have been filed and nothing has come of it.

That is a genuine Combat logger that should be shadow-banned at the least.
 
Now, I cannot stand people who seal club because they are killing the game in the long run (see what happened to Jumpgate!) but the PvP community have lost a lot credibility due to the Engineering exploit and the Mobius invasion. And if they don't see that those kinds of actions have caused an increase in combat logging, then that's their problem, don't expect much sympathy from people who don't PVP.

So basically you've admitted to being party to a witch hunt, on the basis of an exploit that was used by players of ALL kinds, and the PG invasion made by a tiny, tiny minority of them.

This is exactly why this forum is so embarrassing. You are all proud of your ability to stick your fingers in your ears and fling dung at the first sign of the letters "PvP" without taking into account...just about anything.

OP raised a valid and proven concern with regards to actions that affect not only the odd trader, but some seal clubbers and the like that are also too incompetent to handle risk. As with many requests raised by PvP folk, it's a well considered attempt to improve Open play on the whole; if you read through SDCs proposal around C&P, there is some very real and very harsh punishment in line for certain criminals, alongside effectively nothing to encourage seal clubbing.

Of course, just much easier to see the letters "PvP" and throw a tantrum while yelling "grief0R alurt!", aye?


Nope, they just move the thread to hide the problem.

Time for open press to get some footage and evidence,
to report about the problems again?

Just noticed that.

Why is this in PvP?
 
Last edited:
People just have to accept that networking in ED in not reliable, i did experience lag, desync, instancing issues and client crashes in PvP and i am sure that also other people have this issues.
 
Last edited:

Arguendo

Volunteer Moderator
People just have to accept that networking in ED in not reliable, i did experience lag, desync, instancing issues and client crashes in PvP and i am sure that also other people have this issues.
That is not what we are talking about. We are talking about players who are proven to repeatedly "lose their connection" when faced with danger. Some of them even admit it openly.
 
Yes, shadowban is the term FDev uses for being "confined to Solo without the means to affect any other player directly or indirectly". That's is where I want them, as that's where they belong imho.

According to FDev they already have the ability to track this. They just appear not to. That is the OP summed up in two sentences.

EDIT: To clarify. I don't want this to happen to anyone just losing their connection. It happens to all of us, sometimes even because the game kicks us out even if we have a perfect internet connection. I want this to happen to those who have a proven track record of "losing their connection" when they find themselves at the other end of a stick that was too pointy for them to handle. Your solution would work well for the intermittent connection losses, but not for the repeating offenders of selective combatlogging.

Cool. Then I also expect, nay require, all those who took advantage of the engineer exploit...cheat....similarly shadowbanned. Extend that to every other exploit....cheat....too if you like. Those pushing for outright banning of combat loggers might want to make sure they're squeaky clean themselves if they were to get this level of penalty delivered.
 
Just noticed that.

Why is this in PvP?

Because Elite is War of the Roses 2.0...
just have a look at how stuff is implemented...
And most people don't read this section of the forums.

The War of the Roses devs gave up,
removed the game from all stores.
Feb 28th is to come yet
 

Sir.Tj

The Moderator who shall not be Blamed....
Volunteer Moderator
As we i.e the Moderation team are getting multiple reported posts from this thread it will be closed to allow things to calm down.

If you can't post without making it personal them please don't post at all.

Thanks.
 

Sir.Tj

The Moderator who shall not be Blamed....
Volunteer Moderator
Ok thread is now open.

Let's stick to the rules from this point on please.

Thanks all.
 
So basically you've admitted to being party to a witch hunt, on the basis of an exploit that was used by players of ALL kinds, and the PG invasion made by a tiny, tiny minority of them.

This is exactly why this forum is so embarrassing. You are all proud of your ability to stick your fingers in your ears and fling dung at the first sign of the letters "PvP" without taking into account...just about anything.

OP raised a valid and proven concern with regards to actions that affect not only the odd trader, but some seal clubbers and the like that are also too incompetent to handle risk. As with many requests raised by PvP folk, it's a well considered attempt to improve Open play on the whole; if you read through SDCs proposal around C&P, there is some very real and very harsh punishment in line for certain criminals, alongside effectively nothing to encourage seal clubbing.

Of course, just much easier to see the letters "PvP" and throw a tantrum while yelling "grief0R alurt!", aye?

Just noticed that.

Why is this in PvP?

Witch Hunt my Perfectly formed Bottom!!

I am telling you how the the PvP community is regarded by the majority of the players I've talked to.

You've only just noticed that those people now consider PvP a bad word ???

It's because of the actions of the Mobius invasion and the Engineering exploit which was perceived as a PVP thing. That is why the amount of sympathy they have for people crying when a Seal Clubber can't get a kill because of a combat log is a big fat zero and that the PvP community only have themselves to blame. You upset that people don't want to play with you if you go out to spoilt their game on purpose?

Now I've already told you, people going all out for PVP who want to. NO Problem with that. People who fly in open have to be aware of these things. If there was a better way (or any ) for people to track wanted Player ships (Wouldn't PvP people want that because you'd get more combat against willing opponents?) then I think Combat Logging would probably more of a concern to most players, because if a Griefer combat logs (as Morbad has shown); there would be more complaints.

Now I'll say again, Frontier need to publish figures showing how many people have been banned and why (but not who) and I'm hoping to heck that the Karma system will give them meaningful data to work with.

As this is purely a PVP issue so surely it belongs in the PVP Subforum?

(Hoping that I was civil enough)
 
As this is purely a PVP issue so surely it belongs in the PVP Subforum?
No, it's really not. This is a shared world always online game. Combat logging is a game-wide issue that makes a joke out of almost all of ED's game mechanics, rules and the dev's attempts at balancing their game's PvE content.

Check this thread I made for detailed info on how exactly combat logging affects the PvE game:

https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showt...-Task-Kill-on-Thargoids?p=6269345#post6269345
 
Back
Top Bottom