It could have worked if the OP had first given FD a chance to respond to the investigation.
It could have worked if the OP hadn't gone "or else".
FD would be right not to respond to this in my opinion. Not because of the content, but because of the delivery method.
Delivery method doesn't invalidate the claims, though. I think demanding an explanation, publicly, with evidence presented, given the radio silence on this issue, is the perfect measured response.
Furthermore, they were given a week, which is well beyond the 48 hours mentioned in the original forum post.
The name of the game here is "were they being truthful?". The OP's evidence proves that they were not. That's a strike all on its own before we even begin to talk about their reaction to it.
Last edited: