Hardware & Technical Anyone running with MSI GTX 750Ti ?

Is anyone running with a MSI GTX 750Ti? If so, what sort of graphics quality / frame rate are you getting?

I need to upgrade my 5 year old GTS 240 (giving 20-30 fps on low quality) and I think the 750Ti is the best card I can get without upgrading my PSU. Is it good enough, or should I bite the bullet and upgrade the PSU and get a beefier card?
 
I am also using a GeForce GTX 750Ti GPU and I usually get around 55-60 FPS with everything at max except for AA and Anisotropic filtering.
 
All depends on what you think is good enough. I have an old(ish) I5 computer with 12Gb ram. With a MSI GTX 750Ti oc I get 60 fps everywhere ingame at 1280*800 (v-sync on) on the highest settings. Works OK up to 1900*1200 (my monitor size) but then it gets really jerky inside space stations and the busy battlezones (where high fps really matters) unless I dial the quality settings down... Opted for highest possible fps and highest graphic settings, thus only 1280*800 resolution. Possibly it will do even better in the final game, when graphics are more optimized.
 
Last edited:
I have a GTX 750Ti too. I can't comment on the FPS as I don't have anything telling me what that is.

But I can say I'm running at 1920x1080 on the highest settings, I get the occasional stutter when I'm in SC and getting close to planets. Other than that it been fine. Had good fights amongst asteroids and everything was smooth.
 
I am also using a GeForce GTX 750Ti GPU and I usually get around 55-60 FPS with everything at max except for AA and Anisotropic filtering.

Well I find that staggering. because I bought a Gigabyte 770 GTX yesterday!! and I'm only getting 24-30fps.

9hyP9JZ.jpg
 
I've got a Palit GTX750 on a 2nd Gen i3 Dell desktop upped to 8gb ram (so the psu is some crappy 300W), but getting 55-60fps mostly on a 21.5" monitor - cant remeber what the native resolution is (prob 1920x1080)
 
Last edited:
Running same MSI card with an i5 CPU, 16GB RAM and SSD.

At 1920*1080, FPS between 25 (in station) and 60 in clear space. Not tried any asteroid fields yet, so maybe that's the litmus test?
 
Last edited:
Thanks all. Seems like it should be good enough, unless anyone else has any bad experience with this card?

E.Baley - I'd not thought of dropping the res (I'm 1920x1080). I might give that a go until I get a new card to see if I get better fps. Think I'd prefer res over detail quality though.

Shado - Worrying that your GTX 770 is giving you that performance. Sounds like you should start asking questions about that.
 
In all cases, on the sites of sale, the 750 Ti has a very good reputation. And the opinions of buyers are very good on most of the games
 
Every few days I notice a small 1 minute freeze then a windows error message about graphic driver recovery - seems like something in Win7 that stops BSOD but freezes and reboots the gpu driver or something - that's the only negative. Different driver versions the same. Not really a worry.
 
Just seen that this thread has been moved to the "off-topic" forum. Apologies if I posted in the wrong place but it was a question specifically about how Elite Dangerous runs on thus card, not just a general question about if it's a good card.
 
Ctrl-F gives you fps count in lower left corner of screen.

Haa, cheers for that, I thought I was missing something, having seen so many screen shots with the FPS in the bottom left...

Just did a run from Freeport Station to one of the Extraction sites, using the preset high graphics option with a screen resolution of 1920x1080 my FPS...
...in stations is about 40
...in space is about 60
...when jumping between systems is about 50
...when in SC is about 60 (near a planet it goes down to about 50)
...in an asteroid belt getting up close and personal with pirates is about 40-50

Turning shadows off netted me an extra 10-15 FPS is stations and asteroids
 
Back
Top Bottom