Archaeornithomimus is back confirmed

Fossa

F
I know most of you people only care about raptors and t.rex anyway, so you are sated, but for people who actually like interesting not-used before dinosaurs it is a very, VERY dull roster, much of the same as the previous game...

Only the flying reptiles are a good add, but the aquatics are kinda boring the way they can’t interact with land dinos and the way their tanks are mostly empty.

Missing Quetzalcoatlus until the movie comes out is also a shame....
 

Fossa

F
Oh, and deinonychus still has the crown on it’s head, most people didn’t like that, frontier really needs to read more messages on other media, instead of only reading this forum with people that are happy with every bone thrown at them...
 

Fossa

F
Dark_Ansem said:
And you know this for a fact? How would you consider differentiating from Velociraptor then?
Click to expand...
Like I said, I read more media than only this happy-happy forum. If they gave you guys 2000 variants of only the T.Rex you would still be happy. Other people are not afraid of having critics on their favorite franchize.

If it was for me, Deinonychus was ignored for Jurassic Park franchize, I mean they destroyed this awesome dinosaur by giving the Velociraptor their role, now they should sit on the wounds they caused. Just turn Deinonychus into a second name for Raptors, solved, then the only victims will be Velociraptor itself that will never have a true smaller form, but I believer Pyroraptors will solve that, kinda.
 

Dark_Ansem

Dark_Ansem
Fossa said:
Like I said, I read more media than only this happy-happy forum.
Click to expand...
What sort of media do you read, exactly? This forum, and game, is based on a specific franchise, not the whole spectrum of paleontology.
Fossa said:
Other people are not afraid of having critics on their favorite franchize.
Click to expand...
*franchise. Besides, qualified criticism is nothing to be concerned with. But this is not what's happening here, is it?
 

bhoefert

B
Dark_Ansem said:
And you know this for a fact? How would you consider differentiating from Velociraptor then?
Click to expand...
The Deinonychus from JWE 1 is really ugly, I'm not going to argue on that point. It's also a puzzling inclusion, since in the Jurassic Park universe, Velociraptor and Deinonychus are synonymous. Some paleontologists referred to Deinonychus as Velociraptor antirrhopus in the 1980s and 90s. Dr. Grant's dig team is digging up a Velociraptor in Montana at the beginning of Jurassic Park, confirming that Velociraptor and Deinonychus are the same genus in the movie universe. So it was puzzling to me why Deinonychus was included at all.

If you are going to include Deinonychus, I would have preferred that it just be given a different pattern and slightly different head shape, and otherwise resemble Velociraptor. Of course, speculative head crests are always fine. We know Deinonychus was feathered, so the depiction of it in this game is going to be entirely fictional anyway. I just want it to look cool.
 

DragonNTiger

D
bhoefert said:
The Deinonychus from JWE 1 is really ugly, I'm not going to argue on that point. It's also a puzzling inclusion, since in the Jurassic Park universe, Velociraptor and Deinonychus are synonymous. Some paleontologists referred to Deinonychus as Velociraptor antirrhopus in the 1980s and 90s. Dr. Grant's dig team is digging up a Velociraptor in Montana at the beginning of Jurassic Park, confirming that Velociraptor and Deinonychus are the same genus in the movie universe. So it was puzzling to me why Deinonychus was included at all.

If you are going to include Deinonychus, I would have preferred that it just be given a different pattern and slightly different head shape, and otherwise resemble Velociraptor. Of course, speculative head crests are always fine. We know Deinonychus was feathered, so the depiction of it in this game is going to be entirely fictional anyway. I just want it to look cool.
Click to expand...
According to the Dinosaur Protection Group stuff, Deinonychus is not only a distinct genus, but one successfully cloned by Ingen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom