General / Off-Topic Atheist Goverments - The sword of reason

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Not sure how militant atheism could be implmented into ED. Would it be like Jehovas Witnesses or say those donation can shakers you meet in the high street, but in this case I guess the harrassment would happen at the mailbox as players enter/leave port.
 
Jesus Christ was the embodiment of the Christian God and I dare anyone to find a single passage, teaching or saying by Jesus himself that says to bring harm upon another human being, hate someone, kill someone or do something despicable. You will not find it anywhere.

Matthew 10:34 - 10:39

10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
10:36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
10:37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.
10:38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.
10:39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.
 
As for Atheism, I hear what you are saying but in my eyes...

Agnostic = Does not know. Will accept either way--God or No God when given proof.
Atheist = Without God, does not believe in God/Gods and does not require proof.

Thus, it is faith. If someone proclaims there is no God, that is faith plain and simple. Without proof, it is faith.
Agnostic claims that knowledge in the existence of a god(s) is unknown
Atheists claim not to believe in god(s)

I am an agnostic atheist. There is no scientific evidence for god(s). Some people have personal evidence for god(s), I don't. I can't judge people's personal evidence, I can only judge my own. Since I lack that evidence, I have no other option than not to believe in god(s)

"I believe in god" requires only personal evidence. No one has to scientifically prove to anyone else why he or she believes in god. This is the theism/atheism angle.

"God exists"/"God does not exist", requires scientific evidence. Since it should be a verifiable claim. This is the gnostic approach.
 
Last edited:
What makes you think it would want to?
To save me from hell?

I'm sure I remember something in the bible about God not showing himself just to prove his existence, because the whole point is to BELIEVE not merely to know.
Very convenient for the priests.

Yes, I know it makes a convinient get-out as well, but it makes sense in context too.
Magic rings make sense in a Tolkien context too.

Or what about other religions?
What about them? Same same but different.

I can imagine a god like Loki would not prove his own existence just to amuse himself watching the arguments!
Many things can be imagined. That does not make them true.

Remember other religions don't always model their gods as being perfect. In many polytheistic religions, the stories of the gods teach as much by the gods' moments of imperfection as by their moments of shiningly perfect shinyness, maybe more.
I can think of no god that is perfect. Yahweh was a homicidal maniac with the emotional maturity of a 4 year-old.

This is one of the problems with discussing this stuff. Most Atheists treat the big 2 as being representative of religion in general, when they are not. Therefore arguments and assumptions are all based around those 2 religions, and often simply do not apply to many other religions.
Don't you mean the big 3?
Yes they are. Same same but different.
 
@mysturji... Re matt 10:34-39. Im pretty sure that if you know the verses then you know the context. Which is that belief in christ will inevitably lead to conflict eg between believer and non-believer, and even between members of the same family and the same household. Not a kind of namby pamby belief but one that is hard and has inevitable consequences. A bit like the current discussion in fact :) If you choose to make a different interpretaion, you are most welcome!
 
@mysturji... Re matt 10:34-39. Im pretty sure that if you know the verses then you know the context. Which is that belief in christ will inevitably lead to conflict eg between believer and non-believer, and even between members of the same family and the same household. Not a kind of namby pamby belief but one that is hard and has inevitable consequences. A bit like the current discussion in fact :) If you choose to make a different interpretaion, you are most welcome!

I see no contradiction. He states explicitly that this is what he has come to do. It was intentional.
Also, the bits about "he is not worthy of me" carry an implicit threat of eternal damnation.
 
Yes but isnt that the point? Follow me and have eternal life... Reject me and suffer eternal damnation. Which i interpret as being apart from god. But if you reject him in life, then you would naturally reject him in death. So quite logical really methinks :)

Quite a hard bit of scripture for believer and non- believer alike to get their heads around but i certainly dont buy your original interpretation. Even though mine may be flawed and incomplete!

@ziggy... Cant give you any more rep it seems, but well argued. If i might throw a bit of science into the mix, take a look at 'textual criticism' as a means of establishing that the bible survives today pretty much as written down. I would be interested in what you think...

@cardiacthorne... The christian message is that god did indeed reveal himself. John 3:16 for god so loved the world etc etc
 
Last edited:
Had to be said...
BZQZYiCCcAE5w-I.jpg
 
:) an interesting variation on the holman hunt painting methinks. Love the way jesus always looks like that in pictures, a bit washed out hippy type white caucasian male
 
Hello Commanders,

Odd question for anyone who might care to answer.
I'm looking for my home in the stars, a place where reason shines.

Any militant atheist societies in E D?

Thanks.

You're taking this game Waaaaaay to seriously!

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

What is a militant Atheist?...someone that wants to force their beliefs on others, by any chance?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom