Cobra Mk V in-game availability?

Fdev decides when they release any ARX ship for credits. They're not required to give new ships for credits. If you don't have patience, that doesn't make them greedy.
You have quite an unconventional definition of greedy.

Here is a thing that is far better than all the equivalent other things that are generally available.
You will have to pay real money to access this advantage.
Previous communications of the time limited nature of this paid for advantage are now apparently defunct.
 
..., that doesn't make them greedy.

OK so not about ships for arxes but greedy - much, yes!

I was moaning in game about the arx cost of a bobblethingie of earth being 8400 arxes which basically costs about £5 - I was gobsmacked when I was told that they had bought a pack containing all solar system planets for £5 (Planets of Sol Bobblehead Pack).

It seems that at some point all the "customisation" options became hugely more expensive - really sucks for we newcomers to arrive when FDEV are greedily monetising long-developed stuff.

BTW - DLC for the "planet" games is much more realistic - under a fiver for packs containing multiple items (scenery / rides / animals etc). Obviously they (FDEV) find that ED players can be milked easily.
 
and compared to Star Citizen it’s still cheap
I agree with the rest of your post, but I wish people on this forum would really stop with comparing it to the most notorious and extreme example of gaming industry price-gouging. I mean, heck, Star Citizen's 'offerings' make my RL car purchase seem like a bargain.

Thankfully though, it's not the norm (yet). In fact, there are much better examples showing that a developer doesn't have to take the mick when it comes to funding their games. Frontier is however no longer part of that group.

Edit: As for the accusation of being greedy... well, apart from the very obvious over-reliance on FOMO tactics, I was somewhat surprised when I noticed they're now selling ship kits that contain a mere 6 (!!) items, as opposed to previously 12-16. Doesn't seem exactly charitable selling less for more.
 
Last edited:
The Cobra mkV is a nice to have, but it's clearly not stopping anyone from doing anything they would have otherwise have done. I'm content to ignore it until it can be bought in game with credits. If that's not til October or whenever, so be it. I'm certainly not buying more Arx to get ship kits/paint jobs for it until I own one in game anyway.

Obviously enough people are still spending Arx to get one to make people like me not worth worrying about though.
 
Previous communications of the time limited nature of this paid for advantage are now apparently defunct.
Which communication would that be, exactly?
What they actually said was that the Python Mk 2 would be 3 months, and it was. They never said other ships would be 3 months.
Type-8 was announced on stream a few days in advance. Mandalay was not mentioned in advance at all, and Cobra V hasn't been mentioned at all.

I'm not defending FDev much more than that, I want the ship too, but I want to push back on people making up their own expectations then getting mad when they're not met.
 
Here is a thing that is far better than all the equivalent other things that are generally available.
You will have to pay real money to access this advantage.
Previous communications of the time limited nature of this paid for advantage are now apparently defunct.
Meh.
Equivalent or not:
Plenty of small ships are faster and can jump further than the CM5...
Most medium ships annihilate the CM5 in terms of firepower...
All large ships can haul much much more...

I don't own a CM5 - but I don't mind waiting a little longer.

...I was somewhat surprised when I noticed they're now selling ship kits that contain a mere 6 (!!) items, as opposed to previously 12-16. Doesn't seem exactly charitable selling less for more.
I only own a handful of shipkits.
I like the look of most of them (especially the raider spikes!) but I only buy them when I'm feeling 'flush with cash' - I view it as a nice way to support FDev if they do something good - but is very far from a vital purchase.
 
I bought ARX for this thing - and I love how it looks!
20250414115400_1.jpg

I'm also spending alot of ARX to rename settlements...but I honestly don't mind - none of it is particularly important to my enjoyment of the game - it is entirely my choice and it only mildly enhances what I can already do 👍
 
What they actually said was that the Python Mk 2 would be 3 months, and it was. They never said other ships would be 3 months.
Yep, that 1st ARX ship was enough sucessfull, to had Fdevs quickly abadon idea of 3 months only early acess.

Thats why they never, ever mentioned it again.

Its just a rumor, but I heard from friend of friend, who knows one guy, who knows someone in Frontier, that It might be even punishable offence in that company that is Frontier, to even mention about it in thier mettings, with instant contract termination. Possibly special executive order from top of brass.
 
There was a major ARX price hike, many are no longer buying paints because of it.

Prices probably needed to go up, but the amount they went up (all at once) seems excessive and has stopped people like me impulse buying.

But it was a business decision, and compared to Star Citizen it’s still cheap. I’d debate the assertion that they’re being greedy.
for me the jury is still out on star citizen because despite how they may be marketing it, until progress is nailed down and permenant, imo its not a game yet just a nice tech demo.

once the game launches then i will decide how money grubbing they are, until then my $60(ish) got be a copy of S42, a starter ship and a copy of the game, and last i heard - unless it has changed? every single thing, paint jobs and all, will be earnable by in game gameplay. whether they honour this, or whether the time taken to realistically earn anything ingame is offensive remains to be seen.

For me however unless i earn it in game it isnt really of interest to me, hence am not bothered buying skins........ but am happy naming my colonisation bases (because i got them made through gameplay)

Back to elite..... are FD being money grubbing with the paid for ships? Well just my 2p... imo its not ideal and it does go against what we were promised initially about either 1) initially everything in game will be earnable in game, cosmetics included to 2) cosmetics will be purchasable with cash but it will stop at cosmetics and they wont sell anything gameplay related.

also as a point of principle as a LEP holder i do think if we have to have purchasable ships, then imo they should come with the LEP as well......

but that said, this isnt the hill i am gonna die on. right now personally i do not think its a huge deal, and hell i have not even bought any of the new ships in game yet (i do plan on it eventually but my FGS and krait phantom are ok for what i am doing at the moment)

so sure, point of principle i agree with those complaining.... but otoh if it gets money into the game and can get us more content, well personally i can live with that.
 
Last edited:
Which communication would that be, exactly?
What they actually said was that the Python Mk 2 would be 3 months, and it was. They never said other ships would be 3 months.
Type-8 was announced on stream a few days in advance. Mandalay was not mentioned in advance at all, and Cobra V hasn't been mentioned at all.

I'm not defending FDev much more than that, I want the ship too, but I want to push back on people making up their own expectations then getting mad when they're not met.
i think IF that is FDs stance that would be weasel wording TBH. was it spelled out that all ships would be 3 months only ? no perhaps not, but the intimation was clear, and it was obvious that everyone at the time assumed all ships would be 3 months........ FD could quite easily of clarified that they didnt mean that, but they didnt.
 
Last edited:
I bought ARX for this thing - and I love how it looks!
View attachment 426217
I'm also spending alot of ARX to rename settlements...but I honestly don't mind - none of it is particularly important to my enjoyment of the game - it is entirely my choice and it only mildly enhances what I can already do 👍
I'm getting the feeling the Corsair will sell a lot more Chrome paintjobs than any other ship. Practically everyone I know who bought one, also has Chrome for it. And when it becomes available for credits, mine will be Chrome too. Too much Naboo in that design not to.
 
That’s why it’s used as an example. People get het up over early access to something they will get for free in a few months, but it could be a lot worse!
You know what? I'm starting to have doubts on whether the current model for ships is all that great, because it appears to be less transparent than it could be. I'd almost prefer them selling ships outright as opposed to the current "when will they release the ship?" will-they-or-won't-they confusion, where they don't make it clear when the ships will be available without Arx (yet another FOMO tactic I was alluring to earlier).

I'd be pretty miffed to spend a chunky amount of money on a ship that will release for free a week later. I did buy the Cobra 5 back in January because I had a feeling they'd drag their heels. But I wouldn't recommend to anyone who hasn't already bought it to get it now because the risk of feeling like a mug increases on a daily basis.
And whether you agree with FDevs ARX policy or not, you don’t actually have to spend any extra money on the game. Which in itself is clearly an evil act.
My disposition towards ARX looks a bit like an inverse bell-shaped curve over the years.

Initially I didn't like it as it did come, of course, with price changes. But they were minor, and Frontier thankfully added the ability to buy items individually, and gave us the weekly Arx. So I got on board. Spent a total of well over 500 Euros (and change) pre- and post-Arx on this game by the way. Just some context, to make you re-evaluate that second sentence in your response to me.

But then came Odyssey, which not only wrecked most of my purchased items (making them either broken or looking considerably different in the new 4.0 engine compared to 3.8 and even the actual thumbnails in the shop), which were either not fixed at all, or only after several years. On top of that, they sold the Odyssey stuff at much inflated prices compared to what we were used to for ships (funnily enough, 6k for a weapon skin sounds like a bargain now, funny how this goes). Both were a big turn off for me to ever spend money on this game again.

The big Arx inflation of 2024 sealed my resolve* so here is a player who was pretty liberal with their credit card in the past and now I'm not anymore due to Frontier's decisions. Bold move Cotton etc.

*The Cobra 5 was the exception, it's a nice enough ship with its own cockpit so no rush job, am happy to pay for that kinda content. I did feel dirty spending 10k Arx on a MNB skin though, because I was (and still am) no fan of the OG paint -- which applies to pretty much all ships though.

Again, you don’t have to buy anything beyond the game. 🤷‍♂️
I think there's a happy medium where customers are happy to spend while not feeling ripped off, and the company making sufficient earnings. Plenty of devs prove that this is achievable. The above line just strikes me as "well don't play it then!" which is also a common bite reflex I see on this forum, and I think it's uncalled for. We should be able to criticise pricing of these items regardless of whether they're optional or not. If nothing else it's free feedback to Frontier if they cared about this stuff.
There is a problem if you need to compare it to one of the biggest scams in the gaming industry in order to prove that it's relatively cheap, all things considered :)
In a nutshell was what I was trying to say.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom