That was just an idea but isn't the colonisation suiting well with factioning his own system?
I was just wondering why we should not have the opportunity to have our own system and faction going with it instead of expanding the faction of someone else into new systems, in this case, our. Of course, they will be the ruling faction of the system. IF this is me who colonize the system, why the other faction should have their ruling? (thinking of pp2 and bgs)
Fact is that i found a system going on my likes of disposition, before to check the faction. Taht was players. so, one question as well. Why would we have to go with their bgs if any? I am not against it, bgs and pp2 is a big part of the game and a faction trying to undermine my system is perfectly normal, but to have that faction like if they won the bgs and were first influencing faction in my system?
I was just wondering why we should not have the opportunity to have our own system and faction going with it instead of expanding the faction of someone else into new systems, in this case, our. Of course, they will be the ruling faction of the system. IF this is me who colonize the system, why the other faction should have their ruling? (thinking of pp2 and bgs)
Fact is that i found a system going on my likes of disposition, before to check the faction. Taht was players. so, one question as well. Why would we have to go with their bgs if any? I am not against it, bgs and pp2 is a big part of the game and a faction trying to undermine my system is perfectly normal, but to have that faction like if they won the bgs and were first influencing faction in my system?
If i colonize, i want to be the ruler, not only the architect. simple.
Last edited: