Color variation comparison thread

Frontier said that the variation would only apply to what actually exists in the species.

The fact of the matter is that most wild animals don't have much physical variation in color. A lion is always gonna be yellow, a zebra is always gonna be white, an elephant is always gonna be grey. Some animals will naturally have more variation than others and some will be nearly indistinguishable. That's how it works in real life as well. If you look at a herd of elephants you won't know an individual based off their color, but by the size and shape of their tusks, and wounds on the head, ears, or body. (Differences in tusks and horns is its own thing to tackle at another time)

The real variation is gonna have to exist in the markings for many species. Frontier NEEDS to work on more marking variations for all the species that have them: Hyenas, wild dogs, tigers, jaguars, etc. need more markings for the game to mix and match.
This is not entirely true. I don’t want to get in an argument so I would recommend just looking up the differences in lions. Although not drastic variations the differences are still very visible. Way more then in the game .
 
This is not entirely true. I don’t want to get in an argument so I would recommend just looking up the differences in lions. Although not drastic variations the differences are still very visible. Way more then in the game .
You could argue maybe there could be a darker yellow variant? But beyond that and giving the males variation in mane size and color...not really.
 
This is not entirely true. I don’t want to get in an argument so I would recommend just looking up the differences in lions. Although not drastic variations the differences are still very visible. Way more then in the game .

Yes well it's irrelevant now, because Frontier has said that they won't be changing any animal models going forward.
 
Need to, or do you want them to?

Because althought some small things in the color variations need work. As far as I'm concerned, they should no longer invest time into adding more and focus on other aspects of the game and have more time to maybe make bigger DLC packs.
 
Need to, or do you want them to?

Because althought some small things in the color variations need work. As far as I'm concerned, they should no longer invest time into adding more and focus on other aspects of the game and have more time to maybe make bigger DLC packs.

It's...not a matter of want them to. The hyenas look literally nothing like an actual hyena. They're spotty, and slope-backed, and that's about where the similarities end. The snouts are too long and thin, the bodies are very lanky where actual hyenas are actually quite muscular (and rotund after eating), and the tails of the cubs are way too fuzzy.

I'm happy with the colors though, and find their categorization into subtle differences as laughable.

In keeping with the thread, here's generation 2 of my color experiments with the hyenas.

20200828074535_1.jpg

This is one of the cubs from my previous post all grown up and now a mama. Because of how the game works, she's described as gray furred even though she's not.

20200828074604_1.jpg

Here's her boyfriend, a The Lion King lookalike just like the mother was.

20200828074613_1.jpg

And here's one of the cubs, a testament to just how much variation this new system actually has to offer in spite of everyone's protestations. She is very clearly too gray to be colored like mom, and yet is not close to gray enough to look like dad, though definitely resembles the father a bit more.

I think people haven't given this system its due because they haven't tried mixing and matching pairings of animals properly, or have just been trying to breed the wrong ones. I'm not gonna say it doesn't need to be refined further; it's true that some species don't have the variation they would have in real life, like the chocolate brown and black wolves, and some species need something more than just color variation: Color and size of manes or size of tusks/horns for example.

But the system we have is not bad by any means. People just gotta experiment.
 
But the system we have is not bad by any means. People just gotta experiment.
I agree with this. I really like the new system, but it still needs a bit of work, especially with labeling. Most variations are easy spot, lions seem to be an exception. In the pic I posted, maybe it wasn't the mane itself, I think his body is a bit lighter causing more contrast than normal.
 
That's a pretty odd take if true considering they need to completely redo the hyena from the ground up.

They have said twice they won't be adding or changing models.

The first time was in a thread discussing the possibility of adding new life stages. Essentially every new life stage for every new animal would require a completely new rig, which just isn't feasible. The second time was when Murray was posting his greivances about the lions all over the forum and finally one of the CM's told him it wasn't going to change.

I totally agree that some of the animals aren't perfect, but as far as I'm concerned it doesn't ruin the game or make it unplayable and it's still better than anything we've had in the past. I can live with the models as they are.
 
If I remember correctly Gorillas where on the Variation List and I looked a few Times on the Market but could only find Gorillas that all have the same Texture (and Albino Gorillas). Did anyone find another one or are there slight Differences?
 
Back
Top Bottom