Confused, missing the obvious I guess

So space......

A dark void which contains no friction or resistance.

With this in mind once you accelerate in a direction there is no resistance to slow you down, hence you carry on in the direction you accelerated in........

Which got me to thinking, there must be some sort of resistance in space, else what would push against for the force to have an equal and opposite reaction to thrust ?

Analogy ? Push your hand out away from your chest.........zero resistance, you just eventually reach the end of your arm, should your arm be long enough you could push it out forever, do it really quickly you will feel some air pressure build up behind your hand, use the same technique and swing your arm across your front left to right........with this in mind you can quickly see how a jet engine or propeller pushes against this resistance to get an equal and opposite reaction.....still with me ?

Now, with this in mind what exactly are the thrusters pushing against in space to get that equal and opposite reaction ?

Answers on a postcard......

The ship, that's how rockets work.
 
They have pretty much said that this will change. My hope is the speed bleed will stop at the normal non boosted top speed and not slow all the way to zero. I'd have a tough time swallowing that.

In the old system, I think speed bled off to the top speed with the current pips (and 0-pip speed when drives are off), and I think that is how it is going to work.
 
I don't think of the spacecraft in elite as using reaction-based propulsion. They surely don't exhibit the behavior one would expect from traditional spacecraft...

I have my own magical wankel-engine in space theory to suspend my disbelief.

That should be either ‘magical Wankel engine’, or ‘magical ****el engine’, if the FD censorship filter had a sense of humour. (don't mind me, it's roasting here and it's almost 2am. Saps the IQ)

On topic: thrusters work on conservation of momentum, not pushing against a medium. You can throw a large mass really slowly, or a tiny mass really quickly to get the same momentum. Momentum is mass times velocity.

Although these drives aren't behaving like thrusters, I suspect that behaviour's buggy and it's not FD's intention to create a handwavium drive.

The maximum speed thing is purely for technical reasons, nothing to do with physics (you'd need an impossibly fast network to allow impossibly fast speeds).
 
So in a nutshell the propelled mass which is ejected from either a Jet or a Thruster are mass, and the very mass which the engine pushes away from.....thus no physical mass in space or in an atmosphere bear any relation to the process.

There is something called "ground effect" that does apply when thrust is pushing against something, however the vehicle needs to be very close to the ground before it will work. Hovercraft take advantage of this.

As for a space ship? Maybe when it is within a 1/4 meter of the ground or landing pad, but outside that, it's all the reaction mass that moves the space ship.
 
Now to really muddy the waters, look up project orion and see how it would theoretically propel itself through space using multiple nuclear explosions instead of conventional thrusters.
 
Now to really muddy the waters, look up project orion and see how it would theoretically propel itself through space using multiple nuclear explosions instead of conventional thrusters.

+1 I was in a discussion of orion on You Tube recently with people who insisted it wouldn't work :rolleyes: I had to give up - they just couldn't wrap their head around the idea.
 
Now, with this in mind what exactly are the thrusters pushing against in space to get that equal and opposite reaction ?

Answers on a postcard......

Thrusters? How quaint. We stopped using thrusters hundreds of years ago except for attitude adjustment, pretty much since the introduction of the frame shift drive. Now movement through space is performed by manipulation of space time around the ship, without actually engaging frameshift.

It's a bit like the way magnetic fields generate currents in metal, but not.

Not going to go into heavy technical details, but suffice it to say that:

A) There's a top speed and
B) Space/Time resists manipulation which essentially acts like friction.

Happy?
 
+1 I was in a discussion of orion on You Tube recently with people who insisted it wouldn't work :rolleyes: I had to give up - they just couldn't wrap their head around the idea.

Somewhere, there is a video of them proving the concept using conventional explosives. It was like an explosion machine gun shooting out the back of the payload :smilie:
 
+1 I was in a discussion of orion on You Tube recently with people who insisted it wouldn't work :rolleyes: I had to give up - they just couldn't wrap their head around the idea.

It's a sad state that so many leave schools with such a lack of understanding about how things work. And the crap that people do believe! <sigh>
 
Somewhere, there is a video of them proving the concept using conventional explosives. It was like an explosion machine gun shooting out the back of the payload :smilie:

Which prompts another "That reminds me off" moment. In the novel "King Davids spaceship" a planet needed to achieve space flight to prove they were worthy of joining the Empire as a sovereign planet instead of just being annexed. They were under a deadline and they weren't quite up to building a step rocket to do the job. Instead they fired conventional explosives with a machine gun facing aft to launch a very primitive spacecraft into orbit.
 
Last edited:
So space......

A dark void which contains no friction or resistance.

With this in mind once you accelerate in a direction there is no resistance to slow you down, hence you carry on in the direction you accelerated in........

Which got me to thinking, there must be some sort of resistance in space, else what would push against for the force to have an equal and opposite reaction to thrust ?

Analogy ? Push your hand out away from your chest.........zero resistance, you just eventually reach the end of your arm, should your arm be long enough you could push it out forever, do it really quickly you will feel some air pressure build up behind your hand, use the same technique and swing your arm across your front left to right........with this in mind you can quickly see how a jet engine or propeller pushes against this resistance to get an equal and opposite reaction.....still with me ?

Now, with this in mind what exactly are the thrusters pushing against in space to get that equal and opposite reaction ?

Answers on a postcard......


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_mechanics

I'm not going to waste anybodies time, it's simple physics just research it, the game doesn't use a real physics system so this question isn't related but just use wikipedia.
 
>>
what exactly are the thrusters pushing against in space
>>

Basic physics:

The thrusters are not pushing "against" anything, they don't need to. They create a force in one direction...and any force/action creates a re-action as per physics.
Thruster fires to the left, ship is accelerated to the right because of the reactive force. Or your ship would de-celerate/break by having thrusters firing forward.
 
Back
Top Bottom