I agree ![...] On a positive note, the music is pretty much perfect, that whole space sound and country music, so well done on that!
I agree ![...] On a positive note, the music is pretty much perfect, that whole space sound and country music, so well done on that!
Paul_Boland is right : we warned in the CHC. But they said that they will post it anyway, maybe to be sure that the reaction was unanimous, I don't know (they probably have their reasons) but at least, the answer is clear now. Here in the public thread, in the CHC forum, on the social networks (facebook, reddit, etc...), on the forums, it's all the same. [where is it]
I think (I'm sure) that on Monday there will be crisis meeting at Frontier to know if they "redesign" it or not.
Yes, because every human under 18 is pure, chaste and innocent [big grin]I don't understand why people say the mascot is not family friendly. It is only inappropriate within the right context, which children do not have... Most children would find it silly and funny rather than rude?! I didn't even think of those connections until other people here brought them up. [downcast]
Yes, because every human under 18 is pure, chaste and innocent [big grin]
I don't understand why people say the mascot is not family friendly. It is only inappropriate within the right context, which children do not have... Most children would find it silly and funny rather than rude?! I didn't even think of those connections until other people here brought them up. [downcast]
If you do an image search on Google for "cow mascot" or "cow costume", you will find a vast majority of them are indeed completely udderless. Others have minimized them, or simply implied them. Is there possibly reasons for that?
Sorry Harbinger, but this is the most ironic message of world [big grin][big grin][big grin]
Pot, kettle...
I said this elsewhere, but want to share it here, and see what the reaction is to what I've put forth...
I can almost guarantee that if the hippitty-hop were completely separate from the costume, even if it had teats, and the cow would walk around holding it in his/her hand, and occasionally hop with it, the reaction would be MUCH better. And much more humorous. I think a lot of the reaction has to do with it being sewn into the animals crotch. How would the character actor even walk? They couldn't! For a game that touts sooooo much realism, this isn't realistic.
Again, if the hippity-hop was a separate entity, I think the community would embrace it, and find the humour.
I said this elsewhere, but want to share it here, and see what the reaction is to what I've put forth...
I can almost guarantee that if the hippitty-hop were completely separate from the costume, even if it had teats, and the cow would walk around holding it in his/her hand, and occasionally hop with it, the reaction would be MUCH better. And much more humorous. I think a lot of the reaction has to do with it being sewn into the animals crotch. How would the character actor even walk? They couldn't! For a game that touts sooooo much realism, this isn't realistic.
Again, if the hippity-hop was a separate entity, I think the community would embrace it, and find the humour. It creates a disconnect. Literally. Pun intended.
Yes, but I think that it is horrific to remove them. Essentially makes it a male mascot, plus also removing the obvious milk connection. I would like more female representation in the game, even if it is through a cow. I know we are getting a princess but that's not enough for me being a woman myself.
Well ... I'm not really sure ...[...] Could it be the cow is just sitting on the ball? [...]