I guess we can use argon as a test case. Has anyone come across an icy planet with argon that has agri influence?
"Development Level >>"? Figuring out what all these numbers do.
- Thread starter Ian Doncaster
- Start date
I guess we can use argon as a test case. Has anyone come across an icy planet with argon that has agri influence?
Those were Heavy metal content planets thou I meant (edited post)
It doesn't matter as long as the atmo is in the fertilizer list and the HMC has agri influence.
But if the HMC has an atmo in the fertilizer list but gives no agri influence then it's an anomaly - which means there's another rule at play.
There's presumably some other thick atmosphere icy/rocky ones.I am actually still looking for any planets that give Agri influence and don't have any Bio signals. Can anyone give me an example? I mean besides the WW and ELW
But a principle of Agri influence if either there are Bio signals, or there's a thick enough atmosphere that landing is impossible and (far future) bio signals are implied ... would be a simple and fairly effective rule. Most tenuous atmosphere planets at least have bacteria.
Thank you, but I think the link is broken...
So I visited my failed build.
T1 planetary port, on icy moon,no atmosphere. Orbiting around another icy body no atmo.
Adding the space farm installation did not affect the ground port at all, still 1.15 Ind 0.15 Agri (from large agri farm T2)
My T2 Large agri farm first sold 400x fruitnveg and 400x grain
Then after I built the space farm, this changed into 400 grain and 300 leather
Now 2 days later it produces Food Catriges and Tea.
So obvuously ALL ground ports and settlements are still bugged, they produce only 2-3 things.
T1 planetary port, on icy moon,no atmosphere. Orbiting around another icy body no atmo.
Adding the space farm installation did not affect the ground port at all, still 1.15 Ind 0.15 Agri (from large agri farm T2)
My T2 Large agri farm first sold 400x fruitnveg and 400x grain
Then after I built the space farm, this changed into 400 grain and 300 leather
Now 2 days later it produces Food Catriges and Tea.
So obvuously ALL ground ports and settlements are still bugged, they produce only 2-3 things.
It would be very interesting too see if there really are such bodies, or only rumors.
So far, each and every planet (that I read about) that give Agri influence , seems to have Bio Signals.
That HMC earlier doesn't have bio signals, even if it has atmo, so no agri influence.
Settlements only producing three is possibly at least somewhat intentional, since the NPC ones only generally have 5-7 exports out of the full set.
(I can believe "oops, we applied this to every ground asset" is a bug, definitely)
Biological signal, like the other report a few posts back.
So we also heard of a thin CO2, HMC with 8.4% Phosphorus give 0 argi influence, but I don't know if it had or lacked biological signals. I really think it's the bio signals at this point. Which means that Argi will turn up on any planet type with a bio signal? We've mostly been focused on HMCs
Last edited:
Sorry, I lost track - which HMC is this?
"Development Level >>"? Figuring out what all these numbers do.
Hmm. Some examples elsewhere of HMCs going Extraction+Industrial dual influence on initial construction. Might be more to it than just planet type.
This one I think.
This is all great information.
Until the lone intern assigned to ED changes all the numbers again next week.
Apologies for the negativity.
Until the lone intern assigned to ED changes all the numbers again next week.
Apologies for the negativity.
Hey sir, did this HMC with the thin co2 have a biological signal do you know?
Can't blame you for feeling like this! It does feel that way too often at the moment!
Nope, no biosigs, you can check the rest of the system here: https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodies/id/58363209/name/Coalsack+Sector+JH-V+c2-20
That said, ive seen planets with no biosigs still managin to develop agri influences, so im farily certain is not that...
I may be tunnel visioning in body composition, but the fact that cold iceballs seem to develop agri influences leaves it as the only likely thing for me, along any atmo probably.
Thank you, but I think the link is broken...
I believe it's this site, https://cmdr-nowski.github.io/scuffed/
Actually, @hutandrei could be right that if there is a biosignal then there is (always) agri influence. Unless someone can present a case where a planet with biosignals has no agri influence then rule #1 (biosignals = agri influence) is most likely true.
The set of planets without biosignals but have agri influence may be following another rule. It's rule #2 that's not clear.
There is no one ring (or rule) to rule them all.
Last edited:
Every time it satisfies the species' criteria here https://elite-dangerous.fandom.com/wiki/Species, is it mandatory that a planet will have biological signals? If not then maybe it's simple as, "If a body satisfies the criteria of any biosignals to be present, even if there are none, it would result in agri influence."