Another data point is the Lyonesse system. It's been up over a week, has a power and intersteller contact, but no shipyard. I had built another coriolis station to test what I could build to add one, but Core Sys Sector QD-T A3-2 also came with a shipyard. I haven't tried renaming yet, how many times can you rename it?
5 times for free,
Capricorni Sector GW-W c1-18
PP2 still have a fairly big load of "acknowledged" bug still not fixed (and even more added since Trailblazer), add on top that the 2 patch for Trailblazer are frankly extremely light on issue fixed, I seriously start to think that FDev should outright pause the developement of the next major update and give a full focus on bug fixing, we gonna need a new September 2019 community call, like really. Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/dbbxeb/community_requests_to_frontier_developments/
Completely halting feature development to focus solely on bug fixes is rarely effective in large-scale software projects. Development and maintenance teams have distinct roles; stopping one doesn't boost the other. A better approach involves optimizing workflow, enhancing communication, and balancing bug fixes with ongoing innovation to maintain product vitality.
I dunno the "how to", thing is they "have to", the ratio of bug added / bug fixed clearly leans to an unfavorable side.
I suspect the planetary port on the fourth planet is correctly switched to high tech, right? This is how it works: in orbit around the star, you have the Coriolis station and nothing else. This means there's nothing changing the economy of that port. The system is High Tech/Colony or Colony/High Tech, because the ports with the most population are those. The system's economy is an indicator of what's there, not a feature that modifies the ports' economy.
I understand the frustration with new bugs, but the game is still playable, and developers are working on fixes. Halting development wouldn't magically solve existing issues, especially those related to long-planned, hard to balance and complex features. Instead, we could focus on providing detailed bug feedback and advocating for a balanced development process that includes both fixes and new features.
This will change after the Thursday tick. As will the "under development" text on the landing pads.
This will only change once you switch economy.
Seems low. Should be +15k.
As expected with the large colony station.
Current consensus is that you need station + 3 economy influence buildings in the "local area" - which consists of "body + orbit around body" - to change the economy type.
Yep, as I expected. My understanding from other people's posts is that this particular Coriolis will either (a) have a sucky market forever or (b) develop a market after I build planetary hubs. I want to see if it is possible for a Coriolis orbiting the sun can develop a market. I intentionally built this Coriolis to see what happens.
My System Port Economies:
It's not so much that it ignores them, as that their contribution is really small and generally not significant unless you have a lot of them.
I can definitely say economy is not reliant on only ports, as my system had High Tech/Extraction without a port on the extraction world. However, we can easily conclude that ports carry a large amount of influence on SYSTEM economy, more than any one non-port construction.
Ah yes, I now see my science outpost and planetary surface port have an extra population "point", whereas my numerous settlements small, medium & large do not.
Settlements do actually come with some small population numbers, but not large enough to be counted as a full "point" in terms of what FDev want to show on the colonization screen. I'm unsure if hubs do the same, however, as I've seen some folks have issues with getting hubs online without population.
Strictly what's being compared is economy sizes rather than population - but they usually line up pretty closely.
Of course, you can also build a T3 surface port for way more pops. Remains to be seen if pops are local or global in terms of working force.
