Docking Computer

I've often thought that the DC shouldn't be a module - instead it should be a pay-per-use service offered by starports. Costs increasing as the pad size increases...
I'm pretty sure at least one of the 8- or 16-bit Elites offered this; I don't recall which. When you pressed 'C' you auto-docked. If you'd bought the computer, it was free. If not, the spaceport charged you a fee. It wasn't massively expensive but it did add up. Certainly made buying the computer worth it once you had the funds, but of course it didn't take up a "slot" that could be used for something else.

Gotta admit it is amusing that people here argue about something like a DC. It borders on playground silliness.
There are places on the internet where middle-aged nerds will still argue (some ironically, some tragically not) over the merits of the Commodore 64 versus the Sinclair Spectrum. This thread might briefly become one of those places if my comment has triggered at least one from each camp. ;)
 
I'm not sure there's even a market for retrofitting automation at the levels modern aircraft come off the production line with.

There always is.

C-47's/DC-3's flew with continual upgrades for more than sixty years, and are still out there now. The C-130 is another example, and so is the F-15.
 
When playing elite and drinking beer i can get to kitchen and get a new beer in about the same time it takes the dc to dock a ship....
So weekend flying makes the dc essential..... Take the shield off to fly with it i say.....
Real pilots are forever getting caught drunk at airports so it must be a thing


Also found this pic of an early one.....
How i imagine they are in elite...
Yes i know its a hdd

https://thenextweb.com/shareables/2...rive-looked-like-is-1956-required-a-forklift/

My C.O., Col Alford, had me remove the drunks... :)
 
There always is.

C-47's/DC-3's flew with continual upgrades for more than sixty years, and are still out there now. The C-130 is another example, and so is the F-15.

True, although I was more focusing on the commercial aircraft rather than military. Good point, nonetheless. :)
 
I fit it on "runners". Small ships for shuttle traffic (mission ships, dedicated mat farming ships) that are dotted around in convenient places.

For other ships I go without because I usually need the slot, and if there is one spare I'll often use it for a limpet controller so those USS's aren't so damn grindy.

I had no idea it was an issue that people took offense too, that just seems silly.
 
I've got a few for you.

1) Its boring after the first 30 dockings
2) Its slower than using the DC on average - Especially at Outposts and Engineer bases
3) The DC already knows where Pad #?? is before the ship enters the slot
4) My time is much better spent searching or planning next route while DC is docking the ship
5) DC users don't measure their manhood/machismo or piloting skills based on manually docking their ship in ED.
(Mainly because it so so relatively easy that a 5 year old can do it)

Last but not least...

6) If you manually fly the slot and then engage the DC, you will dock your ship faster than any manual docker can manage. (Controlled crashes and Belly Flops don't count as a proper landing, so don't even go their with your docking times)

Those who have ignored the DC and continue to avoid its use are the losers here. It is one of the game's best features, and the latest changes in 3.0 and 3.02 have made it an awesome companion feature.

At this point, when I see someone dissing the DC or those who use it, I mark that player as a clueless Luddite. Someone talking out their rear end about a feature they have no experience with, and no credible opinion on. Someone who is stuck in ED 2014 and has never moved on.

Those who know how to maximize their gaming time in ED use the DC to its full extent. Those who don't are not in any position to claim to be an ED expert by any stretch of the imagination.


I thought my post was nice. Just my reasons for not using a DC. Made it clear, I thought, that others can make up their own mind. I would have been happy to read your reasons for using a DC and say good for you, but then you got all uppity about it.

Let's look at your reasons:

1. You meant that you find it boring, right? The DC alleviates the boredom of landing?
2. You know the "average" or making this up? Does it matter which is faster on average anyway?
3. So does EDDI.
4. You get a lot done while docking? See you're point though, rather plot routes than fly the ship any day.
5. Just a dumb sentence, but I'm sure you're right given DC users aren't landing manually.
6. Proper landing, belly flop doesn't count you know. Really, you still at high school?

Two paragraphs of trolling, then the last paragraph which doesn't make sense - "maximise their gaming time", "use the DC to its full extent". Are you speaking code?

Bottom line, you are entitled to your opinion and I respect that, but if you criticise players who have a different opinion, by calling them losers, clueless and ludites, then you are just asking for someone to have a shot back and frankly, reading your post, you're obviously not as smart as you think you are and unnecessarily exposing yourself to ridicule.
 
Last edited:
Are you?

Well sorry about that. You could do the intelligent thing and check of the DC as of the 3.0 update, instead of tossing out a bunch of dated, irrelevant nonsense on the topic. ;)

Elite posting levels, do you use a docking computer to help you post too? [noob]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom