Yesterday I read about starquakes: https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2022/06/Gaia_sees_starquakesStars likely emit continuous gravitational waves due to asymmetries that wouldn't be present in a point-like object.
Yesterday I read about starquakes: https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2022/06/Gaia_sees_starquakesStars likely emit continuous gravitational waves due to asymmetries that wouldn't be present in a point-like object.
Alternatively we could all vote for https://issues.frontierstore.net/issue-detail/48430 and use the Moon insteadWell, that is the WHOLE surface. You wouldn't need to block all of it. Half would do.
Given that one FC is 3200m x 729m, one carrier blocks out 2.3 Km2.
So with that in mind, if you'd plaster them right on the surface, you'd need 1.3 trillion fleet carriers. That's to completely dark out the sun.
might be easier to just shield off half the earth and shroud it in darkness.
That's true I guess lol. Though Dyson Spheres don't have to have 100% coverage, I guess technically 100% coverage types are called Dyson Shells. My son was playing Dyson Sphere Program for a while some time ago, I was imagining something similar to that.Part of the problem is, you wouldn't see them. At least if you were on the outside of one. You'd kind of not see them by the fact that in a massive plane in front of you there would be nothing to see, not even stars.
Possible playerbase solution to the skybox squares of O & B class stars?This is either an attempt to clean up the galaxy or a ploy to create FC parking spaces in popular systems.
Can't they just fix that in post with some AI cleanup? Oh, what is it they call that... post processing VFX or something? Surely they could find it in procedural generation extrapolation somewhere other than our eyeballs.Possible playerbase solution to the skybox squares of O & B class stars?
Kills two birds with one stone, I like it![]()