Did you happen to see the reaction to the last time they communicated a change? Maybe a horde of writhing, shrieking eels isn't something you can reliably communicate with? I think it's a bit rich demanding endless updates, when the very first response to such, is immediate confected outrage and demands for the developer to desist at once.
Good day sir. I said good day!
Me? I don't blame them. Frankly they should communicate directly via existing means (blog, social media, youtube, email, etc) so the broader community (you know, the vast bulk of the player base) is kept informed; trying to provide a constructive update here is akin to a news wire reporter in a war zone trying to provide an update under a hail of fire and a bunch of snipers trying to line up a shot.
I just don't get how people can support the abandonment of a primary communication channel, just because of the way people "react" to announcements. It's an internet forum, ergo one can assume from a business perspective that there will always be an element of crazy in the user base (I know that you appreciate this basic premise more than most).
However the debate over whether (A) the Official Forums should be a primary method of communication by the system owners to the user base, (B) the perceived activities of the system owners by the user base and (C) the policies put in place by the system owners over the behaviours of the the user base, while linked, are absolutely separate issues and don't have to be addressed in one lump by simply ignoring the forum. There are a myriad of other factors to consider also, but let's not get too complex.
If in employing the Official Forums as a communication channel, people go nuts then maybe they should start thinking about the reasons for that, and possibly do something about it...or not (not, it's usually not)
If choosing the former, they might find things will change...or not (see point above)
If the latter, then ignoring the problem won't progress anything, including the game and the culture surrounding it. Hiding in Twitter and Facebook with a larger, less interested user base, who don't offer such detailed commentary on the product development, is what organisations such as Blockbuster or AOL did. They ignored the market too.
If they have employees that are so thin skinned as to having to be warned off using the forums, or making decisions that are so bad, those who's job it is to engage using the forums aren't...then they ether need better talent or a better strategy.
Pick one.
Then again, maybe this is all a part of the plan? Watering down the effectiveness of the Forum as a primary channel, in order to move to a "Forum Reboot", more in line with the Business Strategy as a whole...moving further away from ED, the KS days...and more of a Frontier Developments platform.
Who knows? The point being we can speculate until the cows lie down. FD won't be communicating anything to provide relevant debate, that's for sure.