Fixing Interspecies Enrichment and (For the Future) Adding Subspecies to Existing Animals

Hey there:

I was excited to see Planet Zoo coming to console after watching videos of people playing this when it was only for PC. As I continue to play the game, there are some animals in which the interspecies bonuses make sense while the others that don't benefit from an interspecies bonus. The two that immediately come to mind are the African savannah elephant, gemsbok, and nyala. I like to create accurate exhibits and mix species that would naturally occur in the wild. But zoos will be zoos and will mix species that aren't ordinarily seen together.

Granted, in real life (and at least here in the United States), certain zoos are starting to incorporate African savannah elephants with other hoofstock; examples I have seen in person are Fresno Chaffee Zoo has their small herd mixed with slender-horned antelope and Zoo Tampa has theirs mixed with impala. I know that Dallas Zoo was the first to mix their elephants with guineafowls, greater kudus, Hartmann's mountain zebras, and reticulated giraffes. In the wild, elephants will cohabitate with the many herbivores throughout their range. Why not incorporate this in the game? I'm looking at a 2017 AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums) Mixed Species Manual as a point of reference and also cross-referencing animals already in the game.

For the African savannah elephant, they can benefit from sharing the habitat with the: African buffalo (occurs in the wild), blue wildebeest (occurs in the wild), common ostrich (occurs in the wild), gemsbok (occurs in the wild), Nile lechwe (AZA success AND in the wild), nyala (occurs in the wild), plains zebra (AZA success AND in the wild), reticulated giraffe (AZA success AND in the wild), sable antelope (occurs in the wild), springbok (occurs in the wild), and Thomson's gazelle (AZA success AND in the wild).

For the gemsbok, I would like to see them have interspecies bonuses with the: African savannah elephant, blue wildebeest, common ostrich, plains zebra, southern white rhinoceros, and springbok. According to the 2017 manual, gemsbok have successfully cohabitated with the African buffalo, bongo, dama gazelle, European fallow deer, Nile lechwe, nyala, reticulated giraffe, sable antelope, scimitar-horned oryx, Somali wild ass, and Thomson's gazelle.

For the nyala, I would like to see them have interspecies bonuses with the: African buffalo, African savannah elephant, blue wildebeest, common ostrich, plains zebra, sable antelope, and southern white rhinoceros. According to the 2017 manual, nyalas have successfully cohabitated with the addax, bongo, dromedary camel, gemsbok, Nile lechwe, okapi, red river hog, reticulated giraffe, scimitar-horned oryx, springbok, and Thomson's gazelle.

This may be very pedantic of me but I think it would be cool (and accurate) that for certain species that have distinct subspecies, there could be a drop-down tab to select which subspecies you want in the zoo and it'll have the skin (and if possible even the change the size slightly) to match said subspecies. For example, the plains zebra, at least in the U.S. does have two subspecies that show up in zoos: the Grant's (E. q. boehmi) and the Burchell's or Damaraland (E. q. burchellii). The subspecies most common in American zoos and the default subspecies in the game is the Grant's zebra.

Another example would be the common ostrich. Since the Somali ostrich is considered its own species (primarily because of feeding habits and habitat), the same can be done with the common ostrich. But in this case, depending on the subspecies of common ostrich you choose, you can get more conservation credits. The South African (S. c. australis) subspecies is the default subspecies in the game; you can get more conservation credits for selecting the North African (S. c. camelus) and a moderate amount with the Masai (S. c. massaicus), with the South African receiving the lowest amount of conservation credits. I know that the European zoos favor displaying and raising the North African subspecies since it is listed as a "Critically Endangered" subspecies.

A note on the Somali ostrich (Struthio molybdophanes): you could use the common ostrich model but it would have to be rigged for it to be a browser instead of a forager like the common ostrich. The Somali ostrich is also called the "blue-necked" ostrich. The Somali ostrich has a conservation status as "Vulnerable". I can see the Somali ostrich receive interspecies enrichment from the: African buffalo, African savannah elephant, blue wildebeest, dromedary camel, plains zebra, reticulated giraffe, Somali wild ass, southern white rhinoceros, and Thomson's gazelle.

The game currently needs to update several species scientific names: the "bongo" needs to be specified to the being the eastern bongo (Tragelaphus eurycerus isaaci) since this is the subspecies that zoos focus on displaying and raising. Since genetic studies have shown that giraffes have four distinct species, the scientific name for the reticulated giraffe needs to be updated to just Giraffa reticulata. The "dama gazelle" in the game is modeled after addra (N. d. ruficollis), the true dama is only bred in one zoo in the Middle East while the addra and the mhorr (N. d. mhorr) are the two subspecies under human cares in zoos in both America and Europe. Again, different skins can be used but because these species is already an "Critically Endangered" species, all subspecies would be awarded the same amount of conservation credits.

I will either create a new post about what I'd like to see in a Planet Zoo 2 (include which of these base game animals should be removed entirely from the next base game) or respond to a post about that same conversation.

What do you think?

P.S.: I didn't add the black rhinoceros, the common hippopotamus, or the southern white rhinoceros to be mixed in with African savannah elephants since all three species are generally antagonistic in the wild. There have been reports of African savannah elephants "violating" or even outright killing rhinos (in those cases, they were untutored teenagers in musth that didn't have the guidance and mentorship of an older male). Plus, I haven't see any zoo or safari park attempted, let alone succeed, in mixing these species together. While visually they look like they share the same space, Fresno Chaffee Zoo do have barriers to separate their African savannah elephants from the other habitat which houses their blue wildebeests, elands, giraffes, impalas, kudus, and southern white rhinos. While black rhinos have successfully mixed with other hoofstock, that was only at the San Diego Safari Park where they have a very large, mixed-species habitat. Black rhinos have been known to kill smaller hoofstock and they've unsuccessfully been housed with ostriches. The only animals black rhinos have successfully mixed with other species without any problems are large waterbirds, primarily pelicans. So whenever Frontier include pelicans in the game, like the great white or the pink-backed, it would be accurate and fun to incorporate either species as giving interspecies enrichment to the black rhinos.
 
Last edited:
I am going to be honest and say that I actually think the interspecies bonus in planet zoo should be more restrictive not less - you can put the majority of non-predatory species together without the bonus which means there is lots of creativity but I'd like to see the interspecies bonus only used when there is at least anecdotal evidence from the wild or captivity that they don't just tolerate each other but get actual benefit from living together.

Plus I'd like to see more of the relationships be one way (i'm pretty sure meerkats get loads of enrichment from being with lots of other species but the feelings aren't always reciprocated. I get why they made it so broad to encourage people to realise they can do multi-specieis habitats but I wish the game did a better job of telling people that animals without the bonus can still co-habit perfectly well. I think it is really confusing at the moment and could be signposted much better. It is a shame that you need to look at guidance outside of the game to work out who is compatible with who. In case you haven't come across it already there is some good compatibility spreadsheets but I use the one by @Villanelle
 
"... I'd like to see the interspecies bonus only used when there is at least anecdotal evidence from the wild or captivity that they don't just tolerate each other but get actual benefit from living together."

Plus I'd like to see more of the relationships be one way (i'm pretty sure meerkats get loads of enrichment from being with lots of other species but the feelings aren't always reciprocated. I get why they made it so broad to encourage people to realise they can do multi-specieis habitats but I wish the game did a better job of telling people that animals without the bonus can still co-habit perfectly well. I think it is really confusing at the moment and could be signposted much better. It is a shame that you need to look at guidance outside of the game to work out who is compatible with who. In case you haven't come across it already there is some good compatibility spreadsheets but I use the one by @Villanelle

I do agree with you about that it should be supported by anecdotal evidence of both the wild and in human care. That is why I use the 2017 AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums) Mixed Species Manual as a guide to creating more realistic mixed species exhibits. (Although in three years, it'll be outdated and will need an update). Like I said above, for me personally, it needs to make sense that these creatures would get along because they're found in the wild.

Whenever flighted birds and the flight mechanic gets added for birds that can fly that are already in the game, that'll add a sense of realism too. There was an experimental display at a zoo of, what I believe were banded mongooses mixing with Von der Decken's hornbills; mixed-species idea was tried out because of plenty of anecdotal evidence of them (along with I believe eastern yellow-billed hornbills) cooperating with them. I believe one of the mongooses killed one of the hornbills; I can see a mechanic where not providing them with enough space or having a specific gender ratio of one species (I'm thinking of male zebras of any species) can create disharmony with animals they would normally get along with.

If one sided benefits is an interesting concept. I can see this applied to large tortoises as well.

You offered an interesting perspective.

And you did mention how the game needs to be more explicit about which species do get an overall benefit and which species are safe to put together but don't receive the benefit. That I hope will be more apparent when Planet Zoo 2 comes into the game.
 
From living and doing field work in South Africa, Gemsbok aren't really found with Elephants or Nyala. Nyala prefer quite dense bushveld in Northern KZN and Limpopo provinces. They have recently started to spread to the South of Kruger National Park. Typically we find Gemsbok with the Black Wildebeest, and Springbok in dry areas or grasslands. Nyala simply don't occur in those areas. I have seen Gemsbok in the more open plains of the same areas as Kudu, in more bushy areas, so that'd be a better fit.

While there are Elephant in the Kalahari I understand they are few and far between and mostly found in river beds and areas with trees. They are far more abundant in our wetter east side.

For interspecies bonuses the only case I know for sure where the species benefit from each other (somewhat symbiotic) are the Blue Wildebeest and Plains Zebra. I guess the same might be true for Black Wildebeest, Blesbok, Red Hartebeest and Mountain Zebra.
 
From living and doing field work in South Africa, Gemsbok aren't really found with Elephants or Nyala. Nyala prefer quite dense bushveld in Northern KZN and Limpopo provinces. They have recently started to spread to the South of Kruger National Park. Typically we find Gemsbok with the Black Wildebeest, and Springbok in dry areas or grasslands. Nyala simply don't occur in those areas. I have seen Gemsbok in the more open plains of the same areas as Kudu, in more bushy areas, so that'd be a better fit.

While there are Elephant in the Kalahari I understand they are few and far between and mostly found in river beds and areas with trees. They are far more abundant in our wetter east side.

For interspecies bonuses the only case I know for sure where the species benefit from each other (somewhat symbiotic) are the Blue Wildebeest and Plains Zebra. I guess the same might be true for Black Wildebeest, Blesbok, Red Hartebeest and Mountain Zebra.
Thank you for sharing your personal anecdotes on seeing gemsboks and how they've mixed with other species.

To amend my original thought based on your anecdote, the gemsbok would benefit from mixing with the: black wildebeest, blue wildebeest, plains zebra, and springbok.

I would love for PZ2 to add greater kudu. From a completionist standpoint, I wouldn't mind seeing the mountain zebra added to the game, along with the Grévy's (more specifically the Hartmann's mountain zebra since they are represented in zoos). The blesbok is well-represented ungulate in zoos in both the U.S. and Europe. The red hartebeest is an underrepresented species, more represented in Europe than the U.S.
 
I'm definitely biased, but I'd love to see all our antelopes in game! I think Roan and Impala would be my tops. But one could do a nice Nyala, Duiker, Sharpe's Grysbok, Bushbuck combo, and possible add Suni to that. Impala are just ubiquotous in Eastern Southern Africa, but to me they are beautiful. My favourite Kruger scene of Impala, Zebra, and Warthog.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5074.jpg
    IMG_5074.jpg
    827.7 KB · Views: 53
Hey there:

I was excited to see Planet Zoo coming to console after watching videos of people playing this when it was only for PC. As I continue to play the game, there are some animals in which the interspecies bonuses make sense while the others that don't benefit from an interspecies bonus. The two that immediately come to mind are the African savannah elephant, gemsbok, and nyala. I like to create accurate exhibits and mix species that would naturally occur in the wild. But zoos will be zoos and will mix species that aren't ordinarily seen together.

Granted, in real life (and at least here in the United States), certain zoos are starting to incorporate African savannah elephants with other hoofstock; examples I have seen in person are Fresno Chaffee Zoo has their small herd mixed with slender-horned antelope and Zoo Tampa has theirs mixed with impala. I know that Dallas Zoo was the first to mix their elephants with guineafowls, greater kudus, Hartmann's mountain zebras, and reticulated giraffes. In the wild, elephants will cohabitate with the many herbivores throughout their range. Why not incorporate this in the game? I'm looking at a 2017 AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums) Mixed Species Manual as a point of reference and also cross-referencing animals already in the game.

For the African savannah elephant, they can benefit from sharing the habitat with the: African buffalo (occurs in the wild), blue wildebeest (occurs in the wild), common ostrich (occurs in the wild), gemsbok (occurs in the wild), Nile lechwe (AZA success AND in the wild), nyala (occurs in the wild), plains zebra (AZA success AND in the wild), reticulated giraffe (AZA success AND in the wild), sable antelope (occurs in the wild), springbok (occurs in the wild), and Thomson's gazelle (AZA success AND in the wild).

For the gemsbok, I would like to see them have interspecies bonuses with the: African savannah elephant, blue wildebeest, common ostrich, plains zebra, southern white rhinoceros, and springbok. According to the 2017 manual, gemsbok have successfully cohabitated with the African buffalo, bongo, dama gazelle, European fallow deer, Nile lechwe, nyala, reticulated giraffe, sable antelope, scimitar-horned oryx, Somali wild ass, and Thomson's gazelle.

For the nyala, I would like to see them have interspecies bonuses with the: African buffalo, African savannah elephant, blue wildebeest, common ostrich, plains zebra, sable antelope, and southern white rhinoceros. According to the 2017 manual, nyalas have successfully cohabitated with the addax, bongo, dromedary camel, gemsbok, Nile lechwe, okapi, red river hog, reticulated giraffe, scimitar-horned oryx, springbok, and Thomson's gazelle.

This may be very pedantic of me but I think it would be cool (and accurate) that for certain species that have distinct subspecies, there could be a drop-down tab to select which subspecies you want in the zoo and it'll have the skin (and if possible even the change the size slightly) to match said subspecies. For example, the plains zebra, at least in the U.S. does have two subspecies that show up in zoos: the Grant's (E. q. boehmi) and the Burchell's or Damaraland (E. q. burchellii). The subspecies most common in American zoos and the default subspecies in the game is the Grant's zebra.

Another example would be the common ostrich. Since the Somali ostrich is considered its own species (primarily because of feeding habits and habitat), the same can be done with the common ostrich. But in this case, depending on the subspecies of common ostrich you choose, you can get more conservation credits. The South African (S. c. australis) subspecies is the default subspecies in the game; you can get more conservation credits for selecting the North African (S. c. camelus) and a moderate amount with the Masai (S. c. massaicus), with the South African receiving the lowest amount of conservation credits. I know that the European zoos favor displaying and raising the North African subspecies since it is listed as a "Critically Endangered" subspecies.

A note on the Somali ostrich (Struthio molybdophanes): you could use the common ostrich model but it would have to be rigged for it to be a browser instead of a forager like the common ostrich. The Somali ostrich is also called the "blue-necked" ostrich. The Somali ostrich has a conservation status as "Vulnerable". I can see the Somali ostrich receive interspecies enrichment from the: African buffalo, African savannah elephant, blue wildebeest, dromedary camel, plains zebra, reticulated giraffe, Somali wild ass, southern white rhinoceros, and Thomson's gazelle.

The game currently needs to update several species scientific names: the "bongo" needs to be specified to the being the eastern bongo (Tragelaphus eurycerus isaaci) since this is the subspecies that zoos focus on displaying and raising. Since genetic studies have shown that giraffes have four distinct species, the scientific name for the reticulated giraffe needs to be updated to just Giraffa reticulata. The "dama gazelle" in the game is modeled after addra (N. d. ruficollis), the true dama is only bred in one zoo in the Middle East while the addra and the mhorr (N. d. mhorr) are the two subspecies under human cares in zoos in both America and Europe. Again, different skins can be used but because these species is already an "Critically Endangered" species, all subspecies would be awarded the same amount of conservation credits.

I will either create a new post about what I'd like to see in a Planet Zoo 2 (include which of these base game animals should be removed entirely from the next base game) or respond to a post about that same conversation.

What do you think?

P.S.: I didn't add the black rhinoceros, the common hippopotamus, or the southern white rhinoceros to be mixed in with African savannah elephants since all three species are generally antagonistic in the wild. There have been reports of African savannah elephants "violating" or even outright killing rhinos (in those cases, they were untutored teenagers in musth that didn't have the guidance and mentorship of an older male). Plus, I haven't see any zoo or safari park attempted, let alone succeed, in mixing these species together. While visually they look like they share the same space, Fresno Chaffee Zoo do have barriers to separate their African savannah elephants from the other habitat which houses their blue wildebeests, elands, giraffes, impalas, kudus, and southern white rhinos. While black rhinos have successfully mixed with other hoofstock, that was only at the San Diego Safari Park where they have a very large, mixed-species habitat. Black rhinos have been known to kill smaller hoofstock and they've unsuccessfully been housed with ostriches. The only animals black rhinos have successfully mixed with other species without any problems are large waterbirds, primarily pelicans. So whenever Frontier include pelicans in the game, like the great white or the pink-backed, it would be accurate and fun to incorporate either species as giving interspecies enrichment to the black rhinos.
cough*animalnerd*cough

Are you taking into account diseases/parasites/viruses etc. that one group carry but have good immunity to, vs a threatened population that genetically may have less immunity (I mean as a species, not individuals)? It's an interesting issue when we start talking about integrated habitats. Then there's vaccines, too. For example domesticated dogs get a Parvo vaccine that doesn't work on wolves or wolf hybrids; so a vaccinated canis lupus will still get Parvo, whereas its subspecies canis familaris won't.

I haven't seen the disease mechanic much yet in game (still relatively new to play), but I'm interested to see how the system works.
As I said further up the forum, really the biggest obstacle to mixed habitats is space, and the fact that we can't split a large habitat into sub-zones for work. Until that happens, this is all a little academic.
 
The lack of interspecies enrichment for Gemsbok bothers me the most. They should also have the grassland tag.
  • Gemsbok-> African Buffalo, Black Wildebeest, Blue Wildebeest, Common Ostrich, Plains Zebra, Reticulated Giraffe, Sable Antelope, Southern White Rhinoceros, Springbok
oh also:
  • African Crested Porcupine-> Common Warthog, Meerkat
 
The thing I don’t understand is the “inter species bonus.” I have quite a few mixed species habitats set up based on the implied bonus, however, there are multiple species in each of these habitats that get zero donations from guests despite being 100% on all animal welfare metrics. Shouldn’t the bonus be driving donations? Not cutting them off completely?
 
Back
Top Bottom