Flashbacks of being taught to kill...

That's been my experience as well. Some egos here and there, but I guess that's to be expecting anywhere, really. Most though seem surprisingly humble and kind. Maybe that comes with confidence and stability for some. Haven't been in that scene for quite a while now myself.

Cheers.

Because those who are not, will be challenged... and eventually killed.

Only the meek and humble will survive Martial Arts.

This is ancient knowledge passed down from master to pupil for thousands of years. Stay away from trouble. Do not advertise yourself.
 
Because those who are not, will be challenged... and eventually killed.

Only the meek and humble will survive Martial Arts.

This is ancient knowledge passed down from master to pupil for thousands of years. Stay away from trouble. Do not advertise yourself.

I suppose early on. Thankfully that isn't so much the case these days, though I suppose it still does happen on occasion, and depending on where you live and the like.

"The art of fighting without fighting." I think Bruce Lee put it pretty well, and I also sort of referenced this in the OP.

Either way, there is also a camaraderie when training with others and being willing to both learn and teach.
 
I suppose early on. Thankfully that isn't so much the case these days, though I suppose it still does happen on occasion, and depending on where you live and the like.

"The art of fighting without fighting." I think Bruce Lee put it pretty well, and I also sort of referenced this in the OP.

Either way, there is also a camaraderie when training with others and being willing to both learn and teach.

Bruce Lee had more of a show than practical Martial Arts. He knew this, and played with it. He got challenged a lot. I still believe that is what eventually killed him, even though others say it was drugs.

The "fighting without fighting" is a form of "winning without fighting" and is a type of Martial Arts where you put on a show with a fictional enemy, win over that enemy and thus gets to loot and hurt those who believe you actually fought and won.

"Winning by scaring", "Winning without actually winning".

We see this a lot in global politics. It works because the show is indistinguishable from the truth.
 
Bruce Lee had more of a show than practical Martial Arts. He knew this, and played with it. He got challenged a lot. I still believe that is what eventually killed him, even though others say it was drugs.

The "fighting without fighting" is a form of "winning without fighting" and is a type of Martial Arts where you put on a show with a fictional enemy, win over that enemy and thus gets to loot and hurt those who believe you actually fought and won.

"Winning by scaring", "Winning without actually winning".

We see this a lot in global politics. It works because the show is indistinguishable from the truth.

It was in a movie, so the context was inherently a little contrived, but I think he was saying more than that by it. Yes, he was definitely a showman, but I think there was also a duality beyond that and that he believed in more altruistic truths and ways of relating to others beyond his performance. If you haven't seen some of the interviews with him, I'd recommend checking them out. He of course plays the cool cat, which was part of his MO, but there's more than that there. I think he saw some of the discrepancies though, and this is likely what lead to his more philosophical outlooks on some things.

I think in some ways he was still very much a young man, trying to make his mark and prove himself to the world. It would have been interesting to see the sort of person he would have matured into later in life.
 
Last edited:
On the contrary, killers is our default state, and civilisation is an illusion. Denying our true nature will make us psychotic eventually.

Yawn. This is below sophomoric. Did a radioactive Ayn Rand book bite you at an early age?

Well I have a degree in evolutionary biology, and I promise that the social darwinistic is just that. Humans are very malleable. Growimg up in violent, insecure surroundings can damage us. It leaves us primed for bad stuff. At our core though, our definimg characteristic is cooperation. We prefer peaceful co-existence and win-win scenarios.
 
Back
Top Bottom