Frontier, you guys should play the Witcher 3...

Perhaps then you'll realise how small your game is by comparison. Not in terms of size, but in terms of meaningful content and value.

I'm looking at the ED launcher where I can buy "Sounds of Elite: Dangerous"... and I'm thinking "why do I need to BUY this?". Witcher 3 offers a ton of free goods right from the get-go. Soundtrack? Done. Comics? Done. Artbook? Done. Cosmetic DLCs? Have at them! Extra missions? Yep.

Oh sure, that game is also buggy as hell... but you've got that covered with 1.3 anyway, so no worries.

*sigh*

I still want to like Elite, really I do. You've made a fantastic engine, superb graphics and sounds - all this adds to the immersion. But then the feeling is broken when the rest of the game feels like a progress bar simulator. A simulator which doesn't respect my time as a player. Long shield recharge even at stations... rep decay... lowered profits for bounty hunting with increased risks. I guess there's some hope in exploration - since PP seems completely broken in my opinion this seems like the only viable thing left to do.

So I want to like Elite, but it's hard. I'll try exploration - the one thing that should be working fine. But it's really hard to like Elite, especially hard when compared to a game like the Witcher. A comparison which should probably not exist at all - I mean these are two completely different games, with different goals in mind! But it's painfully obvious how much value for money one gets when they purchase either game.

I don't mean to be mean or anything - like I wrote, I want to like ED, I want to have a reason to support you guys... So please, take a hint from CDP Red. See how much superb content you can put into a game and still come out on top. Take a hint from those guys.
 
Last edited:
Wh... wha... ??? Eh? Sorry I just cannot comprehend any of the sentence you just wrote. :D

I simply found it horribly uninteresting, and the PS4 version looked rubbish compared to the footage I had seen a few years ago. Just my own opinion of course, I am sure that many people find it a wonderful game - it's just not to my taste.
 
I just bought Twitcher 3 last week and have really been impressed with it so far.

If we are comparing games, it seems to blow Bioware's Dragon Age out of the water.

Yet, I keep spending my time in Elite...

Getting your money's worth is an interesting concept when it comes to gaming.

Witcher, you probably will be able to put in 100+ so hours into quality entertainment.

I have probably spent 5 times that much in Elite already.

And I think I will be playing Elite also a year from now, and a year after that.

Not so, with Witcher.

Both great games in my opinion, so why really compare?

Enjoy both for what they are. :)
 
Impossible to compare the two games, really, as one is quest/story driven and the other is not, but I get your point and agree that adding meat to the bones would be no bad thing.
 
Yeah, another 'Sword & Sorcery' game. This is what you want to attribute innovation to? Silliness.

Where did the OP mention innocation?
The OP simply said, W3 is just a well made game. A very well made game. It has depth and content, it has gameplay. When it tries to draw you in, it simply succeeds, instead of kicking you back in the nuts with stupid design decisions and under developed gameplay.
 
Last edited:
Its a good comparison between lots of meaningful content and very little meaningful content, but tbh almost every game gets filled with rubbish filler, including games like dage:I, or this, TW3 was an exception not the norm (though how great would that be)
 
Last edited:
Yeah, another 'Sword & Sorcery' game. This is what you want to attribute innovation to? Silliness.

Except the amount of content crammed into the Witcher 3 boggles the mind. Actual content. Not mindless, repeated missions - like you get in Assassins Creed or similar games or the missions you get in ED. This is one of the things that's worth looking into, when it comes to value for money.

Another is the plethora of extras you get with the Witcher, compared to the nothingness you get with ED, where you need to buy everything separate, including freaking ship paint-jobs!

EDIT: I actually think that it doesn't really mater if you like or dislike the Witcher - the content crammed into that game is a fact. It's not procedurally generated randomness, it's not repeated, rehashed missions. Actual content.
 
Last edited:
If we are comparing games, it seems to blow Bioware's Dragon Age out of the water.

Hmm, since my pilot name comes from a character in Dragon Age Inquisition, I am contratually obligated to object to that statement. :)

However I do agree that we all like what we like. Elite is a much different game from Witcher and DAI, though, so its tough to make any sort of direct comparison. To each his/her own I guess.

I personally don't think its that big a deal that Frontier charges for the OST, but, again personal opinions and all that.
 
witcher 3 is glorious. I'm going to take my time in it while collecting merits at a station. remove the main story to it and you can sort of compare it since it's almost completely open. it has crafting, interesting bulletin board missions, a world that looks alive. I'll be getting the two expansions for sure. Until then I reap in DLC. Destroys dragon age for sure.

I hopped back for powerplay, and occasional pew-pew but my mind is on The Hunt for now.
 
i have followed the development of W3 pretty closely, and i think what CD project Red has achieved there is something pretty amazing.
they managed to get in more than twice as much content, in less time, and whit only half the manpower of Assassin's creeds mega studio.
what they have done is a game designing marvel, and if we are going to hold that as a industry standard - then i am afraid that we will get rather slim pickings and have to wait quite some time between new titles.
 
Last edited:
It's apples and oranges. The Witcher has a human as the main character, and the setting is a typical fantasy one - Ye Olde Poland with magic. ED has a vehicle as a main character, and it's setting consists of lots of empty space. Of course a human has more variety of actions/gameplay than a vehicle. Of course space has less to do in it than Game of Poles. Maybe when a couple of the expansions appear, then we can compare like with like.
 
Last edited:
The only comparison I think is possible to make between Dragon Age: Inquisition, Elite: Dangerous and The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is an obvious conspiracy by the perfidious Evil Punctuation Council to insert unnecessary colons into all videogame titles!

All joking aside, between those three titles I'm having one of the most amazing years in gaming I can remember!
 
Back
Top Bottom