Galaxy has More Stars than in ED , so what now?

verminstar

Banned
Go out and explore every single one of them...then I'll believe you...even though both of us will be dust by the time yer even a fraction of the way through ^^
 
The galaxy is estimated to have 400 billion stars this is the number used in ED.

The GAIA survey mission collects data on 1 billion of the closest of these stars, and should give the most accurate measurements of distance and brightness yet. A catalogue of about 10.000 real stars appears in ED, the rest are procedural. GAIA should enable the number of real stars with accurate positions in the game to be increased.
 
Last edited:

verminstar

Banned
Here's a thought. 400 billion stars does not equate 400 billion systems. Some systems have more than one star after all ^^
 
Not to mention stars that are seen, but no longer exist because they went nova long ago, but the light traveling from them is only reaching us now and at some point in the future we will see the light of the nova, and then the nothing after... and all those other interesting relativistic tricks space plays on us... so the actual right-now census data on the total star population of the galaxy is... irrelevant because we wont live long enough for it to matter.
 
Maybe he meant trillion?

(I was thinking the same!)

No, he just didn't understand the number of stars in ED. As I recall at the time the game was being designed approximately 160k stars were plotted at roughly the correct astronomical positions. The rest is PG filler. If they were doing the game again today I guess they would have to hand-place 1.15 billion stars :p

Horses mouth: http://sci.esa.int/gaia/
 
Last edited:
I'm not great with numbers, but the last time I checked, I could have sworn that 400 Billion is bigger than 1.15 Billion.

Anyone else want to correct me on this?

It's a language thing, in germany for example we call 1000 million a milliard, and 1000 milliards a billion (what you would call a trillion)

So depending on where he stems from, he probably meant what you would call 1.15 trillion in english.
 
Last edited:
When someone can give me a precise number; be it Frontier, NASA(lol) or the European space agency. Then I will start to question, the accuracy of the figures.
 
It's a language thing, in germany for example we call 1000 million a milliard, and 1000 milliards a billion (what you would call a trillion)

So depending on where he stems from, he probably meant what you would call 1.15 trillion in english.

Why does everyone have different billions and trillions? It's annoying lol

1,000,000,000 = 1 Billion
1,000,000,000,000 = 1 Trillion?
 
When someone can give me a precise number; be it Frontier, NASA(lol) or the European space agency. Then I will start to question, the accuracy of the figures.

From the ESA site

On its way to assembling the most detailed 3D map ever made of our Milky Way galaxy, Gaia has pinned down the precise position on the sky and the brightness of 1142 million stars.
 
Last edited:
When someone can give me a precise number; be it Frontier, NASA(lol) or the European space agency. Then I will start to question, the accuracy of the figures.

It doesn't even matter, does it ?
Even if ED "only" had 40 million stars, it's a number far beyond comprehension. And we'd never ever visit all of them either.
After a certain size it becomes meaningless, no matter how many additional zeros are added.
 
Back
Top Bottom