..... price was half what EDDB said, so I look again, thinking that I had just chosen a place with a short time to change prices and I chose again and again the price was much lower than EDDB said so I said screw it and tried again tried 4 times and each time I looked at EDDB and the price at the station was half or less than what they said until I tried a place with 941k and the price was 557k and I said screw it and sold them, hated to do it, but I was tired of jumping 120ly+ only to have the price change between the time I looked and the time I got there, no matter where I went.
And then I mined for several hours and only found 3 subsurface LTD nodes the whole time I was mining (Yeah several hours and only got 167 tons) went through a total of 512 limpets in that run...
and now you know the number 1 rule of using EDDB: check the age of the price before rushing off to sell, i avoid any price more then 1 day old just for this exact reason, price won't be the same once i get there
This is not ethical at all. If this was strictly BGS, then fine, I lose. But these were a conscious series of decisions made by FDev that have serious impacted the bottom line of many who invested in a FC. This should have been done longggggg ago, before FCs were even implemented. Seriously though, the many entrepreneurs out there just got punched in the face. Like, Mike Tyson punch.
you could say it was FDev, but at the same time, have you looked into exactly why you got the chance to sell at 1.6M+ per LTD? it requires particular states that all have to be going at the same time, so in other words a high price like that is a somewhat exceptional circumstance
I could have cashed in when the market was at $1.3M, but then I would have taken a $0.2M loss. Why would anyone ever do that?? I did sell off LTDs when the market was as high as $1.6M or $1.7M, but then the market shifts back. This is the market cycle, and it was working as intended. Like I said, if it was strictly BGS, fine I lose.
But it wasn't BGS, it was FDev. They baited Commanders into buying LTDs higher, then undercut the market significantly last minute.
so lets see here, your complaining about a Bait and Switch with LTD prices, this just shows you don't really understand just what it was you where doing, what you where doing is speculating on the price of a commodity and then when information came out that your speculation was st risk of a hull loss you seem to have ignored it.
the information in question was the patch notes when they first came out a few days in advance, they explicitly mentioned fixing the SLF bug and so therefore the "best" option, if you want to minimize your risk would have been to wait till a little before the patch, about 1.5 times the amount of time it would take you to unload so look for the best price then dump your stock and get out while the price was high.
so in short, you tried to play the commodities market (by and large the same thing as the stock market, but with resources instead of shares in a company) and because you didn't pay as much attention as you should have to market modifying information you lost out big time
To your point my balance is healthy enough, but I will definitely be taking a heavy loss if prices don't bounce back eventually. I've made my point, and I still think this was not handled properly. This should have been changed prior to FCs or prior to adjusting the galactic average of LTDs. I built my business model based on a market structure that was altered over night. It was not the Invisible Hand's doing.
I suspect they will increase too, but not for a while since players will be offloading LTDs for a long time.
and here again your lack of understanding just what you where doing shows, you built your business model on risky assumptions and when you got information that indicated the model might not keep working you didn't try to make a new one right away to minimize the risk to your investment, any smart business person would have seen the patch notes as a clean sign the current way of business is over and also that the current way of business was a "bubble" and the bubble had burst, therefore the priority now was to dump inventory at the right time to avoid huge losses, like what your seeing now
so in conclusion, there are players who thought they could play economic games and didn't understand what they where doing and so now they are complaining because they lost huge amounts of money due to there lack of understanding.
I will freely admit, i have no degree or formal education in economics, yet once the patch notes came out it was obvious that LTDs where a dead source of money and so i dumped most of my stock when the price was hovering between 1.6M and 1.73M a ton, if you read those notes, and saw the price spike to 1.7M, its your own fault you lost credits because you didn't dump your stock of a soon to be worthless commodity while the price was exceptionally high (did you roll a D20 to see what you should do and got a 1?)
its somewhat funny in a way, everyone called this a gold rush yet it seems not everyone understood the full implications of that.
if your going to speculate on exceptional circumstances such as the recent LTD supply, be prepared to lose it all at the drop of a hat (or patch)
you may now quote this as you please and whine some more, iv got a vette to grind out and im about 30% done with the final rank and i still haven't had my morning coffee yet.